Started By
Message

$40 million spent

Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:43 pm
Posted by Crusty
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
2790 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:43 pm
And holes everywhere.

Oline
QB1?
WR
RB2
Tight end

DT
CB

Too many holes for that amount of money spent. That’s 100% on Lane.
Posted by tigerfan24736
Member since Jun 2021
1305 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:43 pm to
You cant bring up good points like this on this board. I expect you to get downvoted.
This post was edited on 9/20/26 at 6:44 pm
Posted by Madking
Member since Apr 2016
74257 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:44 pm to
lol
Posted by PetroBabich
Donetsk Oblast
Member since Apr 2017
5215 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:44 pm to
None of it was my money so I'll continue to watch and enjoy LSU football
Posted by vidtiger23
Member since Feb 2012
10646 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:44 pm to
Was always going to be a highly spent roster. We turned over damn near or over 50 players and won 5 games last year. How many people can’t connect those dots is beyond my comprehension. If we wanted any semblance of competitiveness we were going to spend a lot. We’d be much worse if we didn’t.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85845 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:45 pm to
Even with paying players, teams still need time to gel and learn the system
Posted by GeneralLee
Member since Aug 2004
14300 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:45 pm to
Sucks to spend that amount of money and then have busts along with injuries. I think Leavitt is the most overpaid on the team and Seaton is getting into overpaid territory as he played soft last night.
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
292060 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:46 pm to
They had gaping holes to fill everywhere. The context matters. You don’t even have to think that deeply to understand why they have to spend $40mil
Posted by Ohana
Member since Aug 2026
199 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:46 pm to
quote:

enjoy LSU football


unfortunately it hasn't been enjoyable since 2019
Posted by Riolobo
On the lake
Member since Mar 2017
5268 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:46 pm to
Yes. 8-4 or 9-3 will be disappointing with all the money spent on this roster.
Posted by DBG
vermont
Member since May 2004
80806 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:47 pm to
People hear a number like 40 and expect it’s an all pro team
Posted by 0
Member since Aug 2011
18401 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:47 pm to
The problem with that line of thinking is you can only spend money based on who is available. Not only did he have to find about 20 starters but also needed to find the depth that would be ok with being depth. That’s hard to do in one cycle.
Posted by Celery
Nuevo York
Member since Nov 2010
11887 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:47 pm to
That’s on BK for leaving a near empty cupboard.
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
9522 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:48 pm to
List all the players we missed on from the portal.

Seems we got 90% or more of the guys we had a chance at.
Posted by Laman1978
Earth
Member since Jan 2009
12224 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:48 pm to
I think everyone should just quit whining and let the season play out.
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
58849 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:48 pm to
quote:

$40 million spent


That's simply table stakes these days, not a guarantee of success.

This post was edited on 9/20/26 at 6:51 pm
Posted by Tht_1_Night_At_ElCid
Member since Sep 2026
316 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:49 pm to
I was going to start a topic but I figured id get shredded. So I'll just ask it here anyway lol.

Its pretty obvious across lots of the big money teams. That alot of these players that are demanding professional type money. Aren't worth it. Like even a little bit. Alot of them should be glad they even have a scholarship. Much less 500k plus dollars a year on the low end and 5 million plus on the high end.

I find myself wondering sometimes how long this era of NIL lasts. Where its just an all out arms race of reckless spending.

How long before the money holders across the country get together and say "what the frick are we actually doing here boys"? Then this wild west period of wasting money on arse players is over. Obviously your Trinidads, Mensah, Lacy, etc types are worth it. But theres ALOT of players out there making WAY more than theyre worth on field

Is 40 million a year on mediocre footballs teams sustainable?
This post was edited on 9/20/26 at 6:51 pm
Posted by Lester Earl
3rd Ward
Member since Nov 2003
292060 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:51 pm to
$40mil on 42 players overall, filling big money positions like QB( 3 of them), LT, and edge to make a few.

Something like 68% of your starters are transfers
Posted by Tht_1_Night_At_ElCid
Member since Sep 2026
316 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:52 pm to
Dude. This is for a year my man.

That money's going to be due again next year. No matter how many transfers. You think just because we will return some people that next years team will be cheaper because we need less bodies to bring in? That's not even taking away the FACT that some of these arse holes are going to try and posture to try and get more money or threaten to transfer

It aint stopping. It'll be 50 million next year
This post was edited on 9/20/26 at 6:59 pm
Posted by Pedropatterstine
Member since Aug 2026
1056 posts
Posted on 9/20/26 at 6:53 pm to
quote:

Oline


Hoping OL coach will have them improving weekly, unlike Davis.

quote:

QB1?


We aren't winning a championship with Leavitt at QB. Maybe backup will get his chance and shine.

quote:

WR


Hard to tell given our QB play.

quote:

RB2


I think most thought Durham and Berry were good.

quote:

Tight end



One of the best in the country. tried to get the good one from OM but denied.

quote:

CB


wasn't the CBs...it was the scheme.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram