Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Started By
Message

Average Sq Ft of homes by decade

Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:47 pm
Posted by Auburn80
Backwater, TN
Member since Nov 2017
9965 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:47 pm
For those complaining about housing costs, remember that buying smaller is also an option. Part of the cost problem is people demanding bigger homes.

1920: 1,048 square feet
1930: 1,129
1940: 1,177
1950: 983
1960: 1,289
1970: 1,500
1980: 1,740
1990: 2,080
2000: 2,266
2010: 2,392
2014: 2,657
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
29987 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 11:50 pm to
You aren’t wrong. People want their McMansions and like to get those massive SUVs too.

My grandparents had a house in an older section of town, pier and beam foundation, probably 1300 square feet. It was a cozy place, and the back den was a great place to watch a ballgame with the grandparents.
Posted by ellunchboxo
G-Town
Member since Feb 2009
19461 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:04 am to
And to think all those familys had 5-10 kids in them small arse houses
Posted by Btrtigerfan
Disgruntled employee
Member since Dec 2007
23902 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:08 am to
quote:

to think all those familys had 5-10 kids in them small arse houses


Not only did you not get your own room, you didn't always get your own bed.

To share a bathroom meant you got up before the rooster most days.

Posted by JiminyCricket
Member since Jun 2017
6537 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:12 am to
Do you think that our government is and has been fiscally irresponsible relative to printing money?
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84479 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 12:51 am to
My house is 4750 sq ft. Just letting y’all know that.
Posted by MasterAbe1
Member since Oct 2016
7031 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 1:11 am to
Well shite, by 2035 average size should be 3500
Posted by Archives
Member since Mar 2026
181 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 1:19 am to
I'm also curious about average lot size
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
134483 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 1:29 am to
I spent the last 16 years in 1000sf, one bathroom house built in the 60s


You can keep your cozy.

I'm about to enjoy the hell out of 3000sf inside, 1500sf covered, brick patio, and a workshop.

We made cozy (read cramped) work because we had to.

Give me an updated, expanded 70s ranch house any day.



Posted by MSUDawg98
Bear the F Down
Member since Jan 2018
13800 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 1:47 am to
Our house is right around 2500 sq ft and was built in the late 60s... we bought it in 2009 and it's still the largest house in the neighborhood. With them having kids later, millennials don't need big starter houses but so many of them want what Gen X has elevated to.

Our village is not shy about their disdain for people like my wife and I who are in no hurry to downsize. Constant whining about school enrollment falling and young families not having homes to buy. Sorry not sorry.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84479 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 2:03 am to
People are much wider now too so they need the extra space
Posted by Downeast12
Member since Jun 2022
1004 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 4:06 am to
quote:

For those complaining about housing costs, remember that buying smaller is also an option.


Doesn’t matter. We sold our 1200 square foot townhome for 160k more than we bought it for in 2025. Owned it for 7 years.

No one was paying 350k for a 1200ft townhome in the 90s
Posted by Techdave
Laffy
Member since Apr 2014
718 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 4:23 am to
quote:

Average Sq Ft of homes by decade


Hot damn you mean that the numbers from the other thread about houses being unaffordable compared to 1971 are total bullshite?

And you can basically get two houses for your money now compared to 60 years or so ago?
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 4:58 am
Posted by Loup
Ferriday
Member since Apr 2019
16811 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 4:25 am to
Damn my house was considered small when it was built in the 80s. I'm in 1000 sf.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138318 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 4:30 am to
quote:

My house is 4750 sq ft. Just letting y’all know that.
Yeah, but you know, it's not the size that matters; it's how you use it.
Posted by Techdave
Laffy
Member since Apr 2014
718 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 4:43 am to
We are building some big houses now. Didn’t think the average was quite that big



This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 5:00 am
Posted by Cheese Grits
Wherever I lay my hat is my home
Member since Apr 2012
61764 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 4:49 am to
quote:

Give me an updated, expanded 70s ranch house any day.


You need to be before the dreaded "split level"

Say post WWII to early 70's ranch?

Great house to grow old in.

Smaller size
No steps
BR's on one side, kitchen & garage on the other, middle for gathering.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
82043 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 4:56 am to
quote:

People are much wider now too so they need the extra space


Our homes and bodies have expanded.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77137 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 4:59 am to
quote:

Part of the cost problem is people demanding bigger homes.
The cost problem is the cost of construction itself.

The companies building the homes have increased the sizes over time.

People don’t design and build their own homes.

But let’s look into that. Why don’t we design and build a house in this thread.

LINK
quote:

The average cost of constructing a new home was $428,215 in 2024, the highest level recorded by NAHB since it began its annual cost surveys in 1998. This equates to around $162 per square foot of finished floor space, with the average home spanning 2,647 square feet in 2024.
Now that $162/sqft is based off of the 2,647 sqft average home. If the average home size fell, the cost per sqft would likely increase to compensate.

If we use that number, we can get the following:

1000 sqft home - ~$162,000

1500 sqft home - ~$243,000

2000 sqft home - ~$324,000

By the way, that doesn’t even address the cost to purchase land to build the home on.

If you can live very rural, that can be cheap, but for most urban and suburban regions, the land will be expensive per acre, not to mention the costs associated with tearing down the previous home, clearing the land of trees, etc.

In summary, for the average 1500 sqft home that existed in the 70s, the cost would start at ~$200-240,000 just to build the home, and could easily exceed $300k depending on land.

And that is just with the assumption that the cost per sqft wouldn’t go up as the home size declines.

So, why don’t people just build a home?

Because it is also expensive as frick and time consuming.
This post was edited on 4/23/26 at 6:01 am
Posted by UKWildcats
Lexington, KY
Member since Mar 2015
19813 posts
Posted on 4/23/26 at 5:03 am to
That may apply to SOME young potential homeowners.

The truth is most would be just fine buying those smaller square foot houses. It's that those neighborhoods have all gone to shite and become ghetto and no one decent wants to live in those neighborhooods.

There aren't enough starter homes being built with realistic sq ft. Developers are building apartments in the same footprint and making a lot more $.

It's not JUST that people want more home than they need. That is a problem too though, to be sure.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram