- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 5/9/19 at 7:00 am to bmy
quote:
The report outlines several obstructive acts that he could be charged over
False
Posted on 5/9/19 at 7:01 am to Jjdoc
quote:Setting aside that Trump did not “tell the world” anything last night, what is heck is “EP?”
Trump will personally tell the world tonight why he claimed EP
Posted on 5/9/19 at 7:02 am to AggieHank86
executive privilege, you scholar
Posted on 5/9/19 at 7:04 am to AggieHank86
quote:
what is heck is “EP?”
Enormous Penis.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 7:05 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:Thank you. It is hard enough to determine what JJDoc is babbling out ... even when he does not use undefined acronyms.
executive privilege
This post was edited on 5/9/19 at 7:15 am
Posted on 5/9/19 at 7:10 am to Jjdoc
Don't forget, no executive privilege through the entire Mueller farce, about time to tell them to go frick themselves
These assholes don't want "justice", they want a predetermined outcome.
These assholes don't want "justice", they want a predetermined outcome.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 7:27 am to Mr.Perfect
quote:
Can you post one or two so we can all learn something?
Trump had the mindset that he wanted the HOAX to stop - he was getting tired of the daily colonoscopies - he was saddened to see his friends and associates being financially ruined - he actually wanted to devote his time to being POTUS.
THAT is clearly OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE - if Trump had any honor at all, he would just RESIGN because it was HER TURN! dammit.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 7:30 am to AggieHank86
quote:
even when he does not use undefined acronyms.
I knew what he meant.
you personally not knowing =/= undefined
Posted on 5/9/19 at 7:33 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Setting aside that Trump did not “tell the world” anything last night, what is heck is “EP?”
You know full well what EP is referring to. Don't play stupid.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 7:34 am to Jjdoc
He had an excellent rally performance - it appears he is getting some phraseology from a good speech-writer. It was better delivered in the traditional sense than what I have become accustomed to.
My only disappointment was that he did NOT delve into what your OP stated.
I was pumped at the thought he would start dropping the hammer on some specific culprits in this whole hoax.
Somebody must be in his ear whispering = "not yet - not yet - hold on til after the IG report - not yet - don't fire until you can see the whites of their eyes - hold on a little longer - they are marching into our trap - not yet - hold fire."
My only disappointment was that he did NOT delve into what your OP stated.
I was pumped at the thought he would start dropping the hammer on some specific culprits in this whole hoax.
Somebody must be in his ear whispering = "not yet - not yet - hold on til after the IG report - not yet - don't fire until you can see the whites of their eyes - hold on a little longer - they are marching into our trap - not yet - hold fire."
Posted on 5/9/19 at 3:40 pm to Zanzibaw
Here is one. From the report:
Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a “credible witness” in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This “would qualify as an obstructive act” if the firing “would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.”
Nexus (p. 89): “Substantial evidence” indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that “his conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.”
Intent (p. 89): “Substantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]”
(c) Whoever corruptly—
(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or
(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so
Obstructive act (p. 87): Former White House Counsel Don McGahn is a “credible witness” in providing evidence that Trump indeed attempted to fire Mueller. This “would qualify as an obstructive act” if the firing “would naturally obstruct the investigation and any grand jury proceedings that might flow from the inquiry.”
Nexus (p. 89): “Substantial evidence” indicates that, at this point, Trump was aware that “his conduct was under investigation by a federal prosecutor who could present any evidence of federal crimes to a grand jury.”
Intent (p. 89): “Substantial evidence indicates that the President’s attempts to remove the Special Counsel were linked to the Special Counsel’s oversight of investigations that involved the President’s conduct[.]”
(c) Whoever corruptly—
(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or
(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so
This post was edited on 5/9/19 at 3:49 pm
Posted on 5/9/19 at 3:41 pm to bmy
Tried to fire... 
Posted on 5/9/19 at 3:46 pm to roadGator
quote:
Tried to fire...
(c) Whoever corruptly—
(1) alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding; or
(2) otherwise obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so
try
/tri/
verb
1.
make an attempt or effort to do something.
synonyms: attempt, endeavor, make an effort, exert oneself, seek, strive, struggle, do one's best, do one's utmost, do all one can; More
This post was edited on 5/9/19 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 5/9/19 at 3:47 pm to bmy
Go for it. I want you progs to pursue this further. Start impeachment hearings now.
You fools.
You fools.
Posted on 5/9/19 at 3:50 pm to roadGator
quote:
Go for it. I want you progs to pursue this further. Start impeachment hearings now.
You fools
Glad we agree that Trump committed a crime. Now we can move on and discuss whether or not it warrants impeachment. I say let the voters decide
This post was edited on 5/9/19 at 3:51 pm
Posted on 5/9/19 at 3:51 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
3 words:
Obstruction
Of
Justice
Yes but by who? It wasn't Trump that has been obstructing justice. Quite a few on the left have been doing just that though!
Posted on 5/9/19 at 3:51 pm to bmy
We don't agree about that at all. Goober.
Do you dress as a gnat for Halloween?
Do you dress as a gnat for Halloween?
Posted on 5/9/19 at 3:56 pm to roadGator
So... it's obstruction if the President wonders if he can fire the Special counsel. 
I wonder if I can rob a bank on my way home from work.
Oh No. I wondered something. Did I just commit a crime?
I wonder if I can rob a bank on my way home from work.
Oh No. I wondered something. Did I just commit a crime?
Posted on 5/9/19 at 3:59 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
I wonder if I can rob a bank on my way home from work.
Have fun in "rape you in the arse" prison, Spaniel.
Ts & Ps
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News