- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump will personally tell the world tonight why he claimed EP
Posted on 5/8/19 at 11:40 am to Walkthedawg
Posted on 5/8/19 at 11:40 am to Walkthedawg
quote:
You guys say that but never respond to WHAT the obstruction was?
I alluded to this in my other post here but I am sure they claim had it not been for Trump fighting the false allegation, they COULD have proven the false allegation true...chicken and egg political theater BS. It is all they have...I also mentioned yesterday that liberals are disconnected from reality. All they can do is spin, hope the spin works somehow, and they assume the media will cover for them when the spin is totally foolish and falls flat.
1
Posted on 5/8/19 at 11:42 am to Mickey Goldmill
You obstruct a crime by using force. Beat the shite out a congressman berating a citizen is one example.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 11:44 am to TBoy
quote:
Obstruction of justice is a crime.
What justice was obstructed? Because the only justice I see being obstructed is Spygate.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 11:45 am to Crimson1st
The problem is that Justice has to actually be obstructed. You can't just claim that someone was trying to do something.
Completion of the investigation and subsequent filing of Mueller Report is proof that there was no obstruction. If Mueller had thrown his hands up and proclaimed that he just couldn't do his job and finish this investigation, then there might be a case
Completion of the investigation and subsequent filing of Mueller Report is proof that there was no obstruction. If Mueller had thrown his hands up and proclaimed that he just couldn't do his job and finish this investigation, then there might be a case
Posted on 5/8/19 at 11:52 am to TBoy
Obstructing a coup attempt low T boy. Go away.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 11:55 am to Vecchio Cane
quote:
The problem is that Justice has to actually be obstructed. You can't just claim that someone was trying to do something.
Completion of the investigation and subsequent filing of Mueller Report is proof that there was no obstruction. If Mueller had thrown his hands up and proclaimed that he just couldn't do his job and finish this investigation, then there might be a case
Instructing McGhan to lie for him, then prohibiting McGhan from testifying before Congress is arguably obstruction of justice by itself.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 11:56 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Instructing McGhan to lie for him, then prohibiting McGhan from testifying before Congress is arguably obstruction of justice by itself.
No, it's not
This post was edited on 5/8/19 at 11:57 am
Posted on 5/8/19 at 12:00 pm to Vecchio Cane
quote:
No, it's not
quote:
Finally, the Clinton story also tells us that another of Trump’s defenses is likewise meritless. Some have said that his effort to obstruct justice isn’t criminal, because he didn’t succeed. McGahn, for example, refused to create a false record and refused to lie for him.
But again, the same is equally true of the Clinton investigation. We know that Clinton tried to persuade Currie to lie because, ultimately, Currie told us that story in her personal testimony. The fact that she didn’t follow his lead (at least not fully) does not excuse the effort. And today we know about the effort to suborn McGahn’s false testimony because McGahn has told us of it. If Clinton’s lack of success was no defense, then Trump’s should not be either.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 12:01 pm to Sweet daddy
Posted on 5/8/19 at 12:01 pm to Sweet daddy
Melt bitch.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 12:02 pm to BamaAtl
Melt bitch
Posted on 5/8/19 at 12:02 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Then where is the criminal referral?
You leftists just need to go all in on impeachment.
You leftists just need to go all in on impeachment.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 12:06 pm to roadGator
quote:
Then where is the criminal referral?
You leftists just need to go all in on impeachment.
Majority of the country doesn't support it.
Posted on 5/8/19 at 12:08 pm to Mickey Goldmill
Why are your reps in congress making complete fools of themselves then?
Posted on 5/8/19 at 12:10 pm to BamaAtl
Wait.. so the obama admin working with a foreign gov.. Ukraine to undermine the trump campaign.. the FBI during that admin sent 2 spies to London to get answers from poppadop.. seems to me working with a foreign gov to undermine the election process and to create scandals that evidently didn’t happen would be espionage.. a criminal act..
Posted on 5/8/19 at 12:10 pm to roadGator
quote:
Why are your reps in congress making complete fools of themselves then?
"my reps"? My reps are all GOP lol.
I assume you mean the democrats. They haven't filed articles of impeachment so not sure what you are referring to.
This post was edited on 5/8/19 at 12:11 pm
Posted on 5/8/19 at 12:11 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Majority of the country doesn't support it.
Muh it’s hur turrrnnnnn
Posted on 5/8/19 at 12:12 pm to Mickey Goldmill
You don't see Dem House reps making fools of themselves?
Posted on 5/8/19 at 12:12 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Finally, the Clinton story also tells us that another of Trump’s defenses is likewise meritless. Some have said that his effort to obstruct justice isn’t criminal, because he didn’t succeed. McGahn, for example, refused to create a false record and refused to lie for him. But again, the same is equally true of the Clinton investigation. We know that Clinton tried to persuade Currie to lie because, ultimately, Currie told us that story in her personal testimony. The fact that she didn’t follow his lead (at least not fully) does not excuse the effort. And today we know about the effort to suborn McGahn’s false testimony because McGahn has told us of it. If Clinton’s lack of success was no defense, then Trump’s should not be either.
You're omitting one important fact: Clinton himself committed perjury. Bill Clinton himself made false and mis-leading statements. That's why his defense failed
This post was edited on 5/8/19 at 12:14 pm
Page 3 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News