- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump looking to ban institutional buying of single-family homes
Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:33 pm to Big Scrub TX
Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:33 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
So then why ban?
Maybe you didnt understand the memo?
Private property is owned by people. Who sign a SINGLE home mortgage where they can own outright, or make payments toward ownership
Institutional property is owned by large entities, who have no intention of ever living in any of the homes they purchase. They however, then control who gets to purchase said "private property", and then attempt to DEI certain neighborhoods. Ya know since school busing didnt work out, and all
2
Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:33 pm to The Egg
But wait, the boomers on here said that younger generation can’t buy a house because they don’t work hard enough.
Wha happen?
Wha happen?
Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:35 pm to The Egg
Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:35 pm to UtahCajun
You'll stifle new building and increase the amount of slum properties long term. This is nothing more than rent control by another name.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:38 pm to Big Scrub TX
Hi PawPaw. Given your many posts ITT hating on the proposed policy, I’ll go out on a limb and say you own many properties that have appreciated greatly in value, if not skyrocketed. Those gains were largely because of federal policies inflating the market.
You may have to give some of your gains back. No all, not even most. But some. You’ll still be way ahead.
You may have to give some of your gains back. No all, not even most. But some. You’ll still be way ahead.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:38 pm to RobbBobb
quote:Maybe you didn't understand it: corporations are LEGAL PERSONS and can own real estate.
Maybe you didnt understand the memo?
Private property is owned by people. Who sign a SINGLE home mortgage where they can own outright, or make payments toward ownership
quote:You mean like private investors that pool their capital to buy rent houses? Weird.
Institutional property is owned by large entities, who have no intention of ever living in any of the homes they purchase.
quote:
They however, then control who gets to purchase said "private property", and then attempt to DEI certain neighborhoods. Ya know since school busing didnt work out, and all
Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:43 pm to Big Scrub TX
I’m for letting this one play out before deciding that it’s automatically a horrible idea.
See what’s in the fine print details.
See what’s in the fine print details.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:48 pm to AGGIES
quote:
I’m for letting this one play out before deciding that it’s automatically a horrible idea. See what’s in the fine print details.
This is where I am. Overall, investing in real estate should be something allowed. I mean, Trump himself is a RE mogul.
We are theoretically targeting one particular style of RE acquisition. How do you deal with that without fine print loopholes and collateral? No apparent simple solution
Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:49 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
corporations are LEGAL PERSONS and can own real estate.
Its like arguing with a sloth. It will take you a day or two I guess. This is exactly the reason for the ban, btw
quote:
private investors that pool their capital to buy rent houses? Weird.
to buy rent houses?
You didnt even see what you did there. Aint nobody pissed off about rental ownership This is solely about single family housing and attempts by DR Horton and Blackrock to influence housing. Heres some reading
quote:
DR Horton Regional Demand Variability:
Changes in regional policies, such as immigration reform, could impact demand in key markets. While Horton’s geographic diversification helps mitigate this risk, regional fluctuations remain a potential headwind.
quote:
BlackRock Progressing On $1B Fund Focused on People of Color
Fund will make direct investments across private credit, infrastructure and real estate.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:51 pm to The Egg
It is going to be wild watching the shite libs defend and champion the likes of Blackstone
Posted on 1/7/26 at 1:54 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
Functionally I like how this sounds and feel like it's legitimately necessary.
The pragmatic side of me can't help but think, "oh yeah, regulate me harder, daddy!"
Agree, I am generally not in support of MORE regulation. But then again everyone short of pure anarchists supports SOME form of regulation.
It's always a test of one's critical thinking & unfortunately that can be hard to find online
This post was edited on 1/7/26 at 1:55 pm
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:04 pm to TDTOM
quote:
Something needs to be done. I am not sure banning is the way, but at least some limitations
Just ban it. They get around limitations by creating smaller local subsidiary groups they own a stake in and they buy them up.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:05 pm to Deuces
quote:
Boasberg
Boasberg and Larry Fink have something in common.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:15 pm to SaintsTiger
quote:
I’ll go out on a limb and say you own many properties that have appreciated greatly in value, if not skyrocketed. Those gains were largely because of federal policies inflating the market.
You may have to give some of your gains back. No all, not even most. But some.
Back to whom? We talking income redistribution here?
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:16 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
The people in this thread would get along nicely Mamdani's new "Tenant Justice" tsarina.
Agreed. Banning the private sale and purchase of property for certain parties to help the common man? That’s straight up socialist.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:27 pm to Deuces
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:32 pm to The Egg
quote:
Trump looking to ban institutional buying of single-family homes
This is way overdue.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:36 pm to The Egg
What's the difference between a "large institutional investor" and someone who owns some apartment complexes getting into buying and renting individual homes?
My point here is there's going to need to be a very clear line keeping out the Blackrocks but allowing Joe Bob, LLC.
My point here is there's going to need to be a very clear line keeping out the Blackrocks but allowing Joe Bob, LLC.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:36 pm to Kjnstkmn
I'm all for the cracking down on stock buybacks, but without dividends you'll stifle investment overall.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 2:38 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Dumb. Will result in lower rental stock.
Still waiting on that black monday you and the rest of the MB promised.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News