HurricaneTiger

Still waiting for you to define eligible with respect to voters.

quote:

---

Sounds like a problem for education to solve

---

Ahh, education is the cure for stupidity. We just need more schooling! That will surely cure it all!

quote:

---

The founders wrote the constitution so that rights could be expanded & they have been over 250 years.

---

That is quite the assertion. I’d argue the exact opposite. What rights would the heavily Christian society that we had propose that we didn’t when they founded this country? The populous right to vote is not anywhere close to what they wanted.

quote:

---

You want control. You’re an opponent of freedom and representative democracy.

---

Again, an assertion. Why is anything beside a representative democracy against freedom? Why do you need the right to vote to be free? The entailment suggests that America was not free until the 1970’s when the 19th amendment was passed.

quote:

---

You claim to champion fairness and democracy but in reality just want to rig the system to suit what you personally think is right.

---

This the best part. You think democracy doesn’t do the exact thing you accuse me of wanting. What we’ve done is allowed millions of people who can’t even keep themselves on time for work determine the course that we all make. Not only that, but those same people are completely willing to be bribed through government thievery. That’s what they vote for.

Now tell me, does the current government that locked you in your house for a year because of Covid make you feel more free?

quote:

---

Why? I’d understand if you said “I want more voter security”, but “less eligible voters voting” is literally an explicit argument for voter disenfranchisement lmao

---

I’m very knowledgeable of the issues, and understand the second and third order effects of what will happen from policies.

My vote is equal to the homeless man. Think about that. If a homeless man who provides absolutely nothing to our civilization has as much say in the trajectory as a service member, how can that not lead to bad decisions.

There is a reason our politics is a popularity contest, and it’s not because we don’t have enough people voting.

quote:

---

"Current" as in almost 130 years old? The majority of the time that we have existed as a country has relied on this interpretation.

---

Is what is important the misinterpretation, or the interpretation that was meant when it was written?

Starr Decisis only looks to keep the worst “interpretations.” It’s the reason we can never get rid of the commerce clause reasoning for the income tax. 150 years of bad law doesn’t justify it on its face.

quote:

---

However, grok pointed out that this function accepts any arbitrary, unsantized string (a string is just text), and it will execute commands (what execSync_DEPRECATED() does) if you supply the commands as a string. This function is not intended to execute commands from the user, just check if a folder/file exists. It is a pretty obvious vulnerability.... This is why hiring jeetcoders is playing with fire.

---

Very very easy actually. For instance, let’s say I search the following path
“/ && rm -rf *”.

To summarize what this is doing for the people who see gibberish, the root folder of your entire system is almost always the same. This is generally something like / or c://, so that should almost always work.

‘dir c://‘ on a windows system would simply open the that directory. Nothing wrong there.

&& says to continue with another command in layman’s terms. Essentially, I’m sequencing two commands.

The next one is really fun.

rm -rf *

This removes all files inside of the current folder recursively. This will delete everything on your computer if run from the root. This will brick your computer.

(I’ll ignore super user privileges and stuff)

Why would you want to do that to pigs? You already know what they do with goats.

quote:

---

Is it against the law to transition from one sex to another? If not, change the law before you tell parents how to raise their kids.

---

So if murder was legal, that would be ok. We shouldn’t tell parents how to raise their kids if that’s not codified in law.

What came first, the law that prohibited, or the political will to instantiate said law?

Your worldview is starting to show its limits.

quote:

---

It’s shite like that why fricking Medicare and Medicaid costs are so fricking high. fricking fraud.

---

The problem is it is not fraud. They are selling at a price that the government is willing to pay. The government is generally frivolous with your money.

quote:

---

Cold War veteran who saw the benefit allies bring. We are alienating them and embarrassing ourselves in the process.

---

Prove they are an ally.