- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: There is a big fight on X about Josh Hammer calling for Tucker to be “neutralized”.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:25 am to Riverside
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:25 am to Riverside
quote:
And can we also quit promoting this Nick Fuentes fig?
Duck! Every time I've suggested this, the board's downvote brigade starts punching me.
0
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:29 am to Riverside
quote:
Josh Hammer is a legal scholar and former federal law clerk. If he wanted to euphemistically call for the death of Tucker Carlson, he would have used a different word. Neutralize does not mean or connote killing or death.
But in the metaphor he used, what would the farmer do to the fox when he “neutralized” it?
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:33 am to Robin Masters
quote:
But in the metaphor he used, what would the farmer do to the fox when he “neutralized” it?
A 30-06 would be overkill.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:39 am to shinerfan
quote:
I feel sure I would be appropriately outraged if I knew who the frick Josh Hammer was.
Hes legitimately the worst person in the "conservative movement" right now (with apologies to Gavin Wax).
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:46 am to SirWinston
quote:
Hes legitimately the worst person in the "conservative movement" right now (with apologies to Gavin Wax).
Wax claims to be a "Conservative" Populist
Posted on 10/30/25 at 9:58 am to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
Fair enough, but I don’t believe he even knows the difference.
he 100% does. which is why he says "we created a golem." That implies, along with the context of what he was saying, an almost complete understanding of what a golem is.
Add to this, the fact that a golem is a part of Jewish folklore, and people who constantly criticize a culture often know a shocking amount about said culture, as they study it to criticize more effectively.
This isnt even a defense of the substance or nature of NF positions. Its just a refutation of your very specific, and IMO obviously pedantic and incorrect criticism of a thing he said.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:01 am to Robin Masters
quote:
But in the metaphor he used, what would the farmer do to the fox when he “neutralized” it?
It would depend. Perhaps the farmer patched the chicken wire. Perhaps the fox was trapped and removed. “Neutralized” does not mean “to kill” and it’s absurd to assume that’s what was meant or intended. This entire “controversy” is exceedingly stupid in my opinion.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:10 am to GumboPot
quote:
Dave Smith weighs in:
The guy that wanted Trump impeached over the 15 min war in Iran
Yeah, lets post any and all things that retard has to say
Now I'm firmly on the Josh Hammer train
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:16 am to Neutral Underground
Fuentes has been shitting on Trump and JD Vance for about 1.5 years now, except for the ICE raids and border control.
He hates whoever is in charge so he can make money complaining.
He hates whoever is in charge so he can make money complaining.
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 10:17 am
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:17 am to Hester Carries
1. I replied to what was posted. Gollum. Not Golem
2. I still hold to the chances that he doesn’t know the difference being higher than 50/50.
2. I still hold to the chances that he doesn’t know the difference being higher than 50/50.
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 10:19 am
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:47 am to Riverside
quote:
Perhaps the fox was trapped and removed.
So they are advocating to “trap and remove” Tucker?
Got it.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:49 am to GumboPot
Tucker is willing to engage in a debate of ideas with anyone. If you don’t like his ideas go on his show and debate him.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:49 am to GumboPot
They don't like when u leave the Jewish pasture.
That lobbyist money must me so good for these conservatives to suck Jewish dick, and the majority of Jews don't even vote for them
That lobbyist money must me so good for these conservatives to suck Jewish dick, and the majority of Jews don't even vote for them
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:53 am to CrimsonTideMD
quote:
Fuentes numbers continue to grow despite his having been deplatformed and debanked. If you’re tuning him out, you’re just burying your head in the sand.
Omg. Is he up to 300k average views?
Some of yall don’t understand how the internet works.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:53 am to bird35
quote:
Tucker is willing to engage in a debate of ideas with anyone.
He didn’t debate Fuentes.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 10:58 am to the808bass
quote:
He didn’t debate Fuentes.
I got the impression that most of the time in their respective interviews Tucker, Patrick Bet David and Dave Smith were trying to mentor him.
This post was edited on 10/30/25 at 10:59 am
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:01 am to SeeeeK
quote:
That lobbyist money must me so good for these conservatives
It ain’t all carrot, there’s a stick to be applied as well.
“Oh sure would be a shame if these pictures we took of you after we drugged you with a tranny hooker were ever made public…”
That’s what Epstein was all about. Get powerful people compromised to make sure they do what you want them to do because bought people don’t always stay bought.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:12 am to CrimsonTideMD
quote:
Yet another dogshit take by NPC 632627 Fuentes numbers continue to grow despite his having been deplatformed and debanked. If you’re tuning him out, you’re just burying your head in the sand.
360m Americans, a bit less than half voted in the previous election.
Nick Fuentes has an online following of what, somewhere between 500k-1m ? Explain to me how he’s going to become a mainstream influence with his past incendiary comments.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:43 am to GumboPot
quote:
I got the impression that most of the time in their respective interviews Tucker, Patrick Bet David and Dave Smith were trying to mentor him.
That would be pointless.
Posted on 10/30/25 at 11:56 am to Gifman
quote:
Yeah "neutralized" is a soft way of saying "kill". Anyone with a brain and sense of culture knows this.
It is audacious to be so comfortable with that kind of incendiary language. It's not even nuanced.
There is also a second message encoded here; "I've got a wall of immunity and impunity to say and convey whatever threats of my ideological enemies."
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News