- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The MSM doesn’t want you to see it…bullet hole in windshield
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:53 pm to sidewalkside
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:53 pm to sidewalkside

Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:54 pm to Kafka
quote:
THROUGH kennedy and hit connelly's wrist
Shot sounds like it came from on top the roof nearby in one video, clear proof of conspiracy.
Probably the Moosad or maybe the Eyeranians, always stirring up trouble.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:56 pm to jrobic4
I’ve shot plenty of firearms but I don’t claim to be an expert.
The OP was alleging the bullet hole totally exonerates the shooter, I’m not sure that’s the case and I don’t think any legitimate ballistic expert would either (for either side).
We’ll see, I’m skeptical. I assume we’ll get a full investigation.
The OP was alleging the bullet hole totally exonerates the shooter, I’m not sure that’s the case and I don’t think any legitimate ballistic expert would either (for either side).
We’ll see, I’m skeptical. I assume we’ll get a full investigation.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 9:57 pm to j1897
quote:
But i don't think you have any remote understanding how a bullet hole works. Dude could have been at a 45 degree angle.
looking at the picture I don't think you know much about angles and the bullet entry on the windshield
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:00 pm to sidewalkside
Either way, the body’s on ice.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:00 pm to David_DJS
quote:
Where is it found? I know about a few people that need to see it.
On this board in several places... those are long threads and I do not have it in me to go hunting.
There IS a grainy arse one out there by @clownworld... but that one sucks, there's a better, clearer one.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:08 pm to sidewalkside
quote:
Was he required to?
Minnesota is a “duty to retreat” state. Now you’re free to think that should be replaced by “stand your ground,” but that has yet to happen and officers should be held to the same laws as citizens. Especially outside agencies.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:24 pm to ForeverEllisHugh
quote:there is a difference between retreating when you have a reasonable opportunity and being activity hit/rammed with a car. Retard.
Minnesota is a “duty to retreat” state.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:31 pm to j1897
quote:but if it went in at a 45 degree angle it's not gonna hit the driver in the face. The arm maybe. Also, you can see in the fricking video that it wasn't at a 45 degree angle so what are you even taking about?
But i don't think you have any remote understanding how a bullet hole works. Dude could have been at a 45 degree angle.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:32 pm to W2NOMO
Shooting was justified case closed.
There’s no talking around this photo.
This photo is George Floyd’s toxicology report.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:36 pm to narddogg81
Yea i agree, i was just stating that if you shoot a windshield the bullet hole looks pretty similar.
Posted on 1/7/26 at 10:44 pm to Flightnclouds
quote:
We need the resident bullet expert to explain to us.
Only one?
When Charlie Kirk was shot this board revealed itself to be populated with dozens of ballistic experts.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:15 am to mwade91383
We will get two conflicting investigations. We will get one from Minnesota/Minneapolis, and another from DHS/FBI. It’ll be like the scarecrow on Wizard of Oz.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:20 am to W2NOMO
One Shot, One Kill. OohRah! Give the cop a medal.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:31 am to sidewalkside
quote:
COULD he have just jumped out of the way? Sure.
In real-time, he has no idea what the motorist's intentions were. She could've:
a) turned left and into him and floored it
b) driven 10 yards, stopped, gotten out and opened fire
c) driven down the street, made a U-turn, and plowed into them
He had no way of knowing any of this.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:34 am to Flightnclouds
quote:Magic bullet. duh
If the bullet was shot from the gun at a 45 degree angle from the drivers side, how did it hit the driver??
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:34 am to whereishobson
quote:
We will get two conflicting investigations. We will get one from Minnesota/Minneapolis, and another from DHS/FBI.
When does the Somalian "community" get to do theirs? Don't overlook them.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:39 am to Stat M Repairman
quote:Three things:
Shooting was justified case closed.
There’s no talking around this photo.
1. If he shot from the front, at that angle the bullet would have missed the driver.
2.There were three shots. Where are the other two?
3. From Title 1, U.S. DOJ Policy on Use of Force:
“Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury … and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.”
Posted on 1/8/26 at 12:44 am to TX Tiger
quote:
3. From Title 1, U.S. DOJ Policy on Use of Force:
“Firearms may not be discharged solely to disable moving vehicles. Specifically, firearms may not be discharged at a moving vehicle unless: (1) a person in the vehicle is threatening the officer or another person with deadly force by means other than the vehicle; or (2) the vehicle is operated in a manner that threatens to cause death or serious physical injury … and no other objectively reasonable means of defense appear to exist, which includes moving out of the path of the vehicle.”
ICE falls under the Department of Homeland Security, not DOJ.
Popular
Back to top


0







