Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Washington DC
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:7890
Registered on:3/29/2010
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
I’m sorry to hear about her husband, cancer is awful, I don’t wish that shite on anyone.

But let’s not pretend she was anything other than a useful idiot to this admin…

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
He’s absolutely grasping at straws.

The funny thing is if we get another JCPOA type deal in place it’ll be the exact same org (IAEA) monitoring Iran. Only difference is this time MAGA will believe them because Trump made the deal :lol:
Won’t work. It’s boots on the ground (terrible option) or something like the JCPOA (politically awful but probably as good as it gets).

The reality is their threshold for pain is 1000x bigger than ours. They’ll let their people go w no power/water/food etc. as long as necessary. Meanwhile, if Summer 2026 is rising inflation and $5-$6 gas Trump is gonna get absolutely smoked in November.

All Iran has to do is stall as long as possible and they’ll get whatever deal they want (assuming we don’t invade).
Unless we put boots on the ground (unlikely, would be a catastrophe for this admin) we’re going to end up with something like the JCPOA (or slightly worse).

Trump stepped directly on his own dick with this one, shouldn’t have caved to Israeli pressure.
Based on what???

I have yet to see any legal expert or anyone even remotely credible reinforce that idea. Show your work.
No. Chances were pretty much zero they’d win that suit. Same for any suit any J6er might bring seeking damages, would’ve effectively been laughed out of court.

This settlement was their only play the whole way, and only because Trump controls the entire process.
quote:

You mean like the Democratic NGOs?


No, this new fund is legitiamtley unprecedented.

quote:

So corruption matters only if it's Trump?


No, not even a little bit.
quote:

Sounds like a good deal for the IRS if they were anywhere near likely to lose the $10B suit.


They were never in any real danger of losing any kind of suit. Trump knows this, which is why he told them to settle, and they did.

It's just textbook corruption out in the wide open, plain and simple.





Don’t forget he also went on TV to literally cry about missing his wife.

It’s hard to come up with a better example of a massive do nothing blowhard.
DB calling anyone a fraud, especially now, is pretty rich.
lol, DOGE :lol:

Yeah I’m sure they’ll get right on it. DOGE was almost as dumb as “90 deals in 90 days”.

Can’t believe anyone actually thought either were ever gonna happen.
Actually mass shootings are bad.

Hope this helps.
It’s pretty likely things will stay the same (June) but if they’re going to make a change (I’d say really unlikely), rates are going up, not down.
I mean he's still 1 of the 12 votes needed to make changes to rates.

I don't think anyone is expecting anything dramatically different out of the fed than what we've always gotten more or less.
Your thread yesterday on this topic wasn’t enough???

Go outside man, it’s Friday.
Oppenheimer did 330 domestic (according to Gemini) so that’s probably a reasonable guess.

I’m not listening to any of the commentary at this point, it’s all rumor/hype. I don’t think anyone really knows anything yet.

I also have a lot of faith in CN in general. Even Tenet, widely considered his worst flick, had its moments IMO.
Read the thread, dummy

Them: it’s too woke and will bomb
Me: oh so you’re saying it won’t make money?
Them: *crickets*


What’s the point of even saying it if you don’t actually believe it? :lol:


Respect you actually putting a flag in the ground.

Give me a number? (BO revenue $)

ETA: I’m assuming by budget you mean break even (650) not actual budget (250). There’s no chance it won’t hit 250, it’ll probably do that in short order.
Ooo that’s actually a good call, quietly a very solid Ridley Scott flick.

Love the Ed Norton nugget, forgotten that too. Liam Neeson was also excellent (although short lived) in that film.