- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The attacks on America’s Judeo-Christian foundation and how that founding came to be
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:05 am to wackatimesthree
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:05 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
bullshite revisionist atheist drivel.
Correct. SFPLC once again doesn't know what the frick he's talking about. He's just saying words to say them.
Anyone who is familiar with my posting habits could tell you I'm no staunch defender of the church, but Western Civilization's "flourishing" would have been delayed by no telling how long without the church.
This post was edited on 5/4/26 at 10:06 am
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:06 am to Powerman
quote:
Islam is also the same by that logic
Dumbest thing Ive read on TD since your trying to prove man's evolution came from nothing
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:10 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
bullshite revisionist atheist drivel.
The revisionism is by modern Christians trying to inject "Judeo-Christian" into every positive historical development they see.
The desire to implement institutions and systems of Pagan societies (Greece, Rome) is not Christian.
The desire to develop scientific methods and other developments based in reason/logic is not Christian.
Those two variables were the largest drivers of developing "Western Culture"
Here's an oldie but still a goodie:
The West's "killer apps" of prosperity:
1. Competition
2. The Scientific Revolution
3. Property Rights
4. Modern Medicine
5. The consumer society
6. The work ethic
Of those 6, only one could be attributed to some ethos/culture derived by the Christian religion: the work ethic.
Roman and Islamic law influenced our concept of property rights (within the context referenced) much more than anything Christianity could offer. The best you can do is probably a reference to the vague "natural rights" which has no real rhetorical value in this discussion.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:11 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Probably because of Islam's cultural return to extreme fundamentalism
But that's irrelevant if it's all based in "looking back" to the past.
quote:
As people have pointed out, this term wasn't coined until that shift had already happened.
That just further argues the term is without value
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:13 am to Bayou
quote:
Dumbest thing Ive read on TD since your trying to prove man's evolution came from nothing
You should study the influence of Islamic law and property-contract law in Europe. Islam has a bigger role in developing "Western culture" than Judaism does for sure.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:13 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Of those 6, only one could be attributed to some ethos/culture derived by the Christian religion: the work ethic.
Property rights too... There's a whole commandment concerning property and coveting.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:17 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The desire to implement institutions and systems of Pagan societies (Greece, Rome) is not Christian.
The desire to develop scientific methods and other developments based in reason/logic is not Christian.
Those two variables were the largest drivers of developing "Western Culture"
This is so silly
We're just going to ignore the centuries where these things flourished under Christian societies?
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:19 am to Pettifogger
Wow thanks Dennis Prager for educating me on my history 
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:20 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Somebody is confused about some things.
It’s a PragerU video…most of it is made up bullshite to fit their worldview.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:22 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Property rights too.
I covered that.
The institutions created around property rights were a function of Roman and Islamic traditions.
The actual influence of Christianity outside of these 2 isn't that great, and a lot of it will be attacks on private property ownership (like the Franciscans) due to the teachings of Jesus against the material world and what we'd call consumer society. I imagine you'd be able to find a lot more theological rhetoric for socialism from Christian sects in the period between the fall of Western Rome and the Renaissance than institutional property rights of Rome and the consumer society that it created.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:23 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
What a fricking moron.
Not moronic enough to attempt to justify the bombing of hospitals full of wounded women and children or the bombing of churches full of Christians seeking refuge.
But here you are, being a moron, refusing to acknowledge that these things are indiscriminate.
Not a good look for you bub. Not good at all.
BYW, truth =/= anti-semitism, but you can continue the moronic attempts to try to paint it that way.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:23 am to Pettifogger
quote:
We're just going to ignore the centuries where these things flourished under Christian societies?
Between the fall of Western Rome and the Renaissance, when was this exactly in the West?
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:23 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
Probably because of Islam's cultural return to extreme fundamentalism (in what, the 19th century?...I'm not an expert on Islamic history) that no longer shared vales like democracy and freedom of speech with the west. As people have pointed out, this term wasn't coined until that shift had already happened.
Islam- death & martyrdom are celebrated, women are second class citizens, gays are executed, non-existence of civil rights, minimal freedom, totalitarian rule
Basically the complete opposite of American values
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:24 am to 632627
quote:
Islam- death & martyrdom are celebrated, women are second class citizens, gays are executed, non-existence of civil rights, minimal freedom, totalitarian rule
Basically the complete opposite of American values
Are we talking about the development of Western Culture or a modern divergence? Because I sense some conflation going on here.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:26 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The desire to implement institutions and systems of Pagan societies (Greece, Rome) is not Christian.
Yet it was the Church who developed institutions such as Bologna, Oxford, corporations, double-entry bookkeeping, and early banking systems. All things critical to the rise of western civilization. And don't try to pivot now and say that the greeks developed universities before this. You said western civilization didn't thrive until after the church took a more secondary role in society. While the timing may be coincidental, it wouldn't have happened if the church hadn't built the infrastructure.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:31 am to AlterEd
quote:
And don't try to pivot now and say that the greeks developed universities before this. You said western civilization didn't thrive until after the church took a more secondary role in society.
So Greek education being a foundation for education in the Western Culture can't be cited because of something that occurred in the interim? That argument makes no sense.
quote:
double-entry bookkeeping
Islamic origins LONG before the west. Later adapted by Italians due to the close relationships with Islamic societies in the Middle Ages.
quote:
corporations
Again, derived from Islamic origins, specifically their advanced partnership laws/organizations.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:32 am to Mike da Tigah
First things first. We were founded on Christian Principles.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Also, during this time period, Islamic culture was the height of humanity for a few centuries. It was the "western culture" of its day
And?
It’s historically the world’s worst religion.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:38 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Western Culture didn't really take off and start developing until the Church took a secondary role in society during this period.
When would you say that occurred? The Christian Church founded the great Universities. Many massive breakthroughs in mathematics, astronomy, metallurgy, architecture, etc occurred throughout the Middle Ages when the church was at the peak of its power. The Age of Exploration, the Renaissance, etc all started well before the Reformation let alone the secularist movements of the latter 18th and early 19th centuries.
quote:
Also, when describing America specifically, you have to get much more detailed than "Western Culture" and focus more on Anglo culture from Britain, which was distinct from its continental peers (and that divergence still remains).
As a Louisianan, no, I really don’t. With that said, despite our vast differences, the anglo culture bares much more in common with the continental Europeans than any European culture does with any current non-European civilization. These distinctions are important, especially with respect to concepts like natural rights, federalism, and limited governments.
quote:
The influence of Judaism was even less present at this time, so I fail to see how it has any role in this cultural shift away from religion and into science, art, philosophy, etc.
That’s like saying that metal bands have no influence from the Beatles or The Blues. Sure, it’s hard to hear the similarities, but when you look into music theory, song structure, and recording techniques, it’s impossible to ignore how much modern music is built upon earlier developments like the Blues and the Beatles.
The founders didn’t have to be Jewish for principles derived from Judaism to be omnipresent and informative on their work. You don’t have to be fluent in latin to speak a lot of words derived from the language.
Posted on 5/4/26 at 10:40 am to texag7
quote:
It’s historically the world’s worst religion.
Sure, now. But, again, we're talking about the development of Western Culture. People are arguing Judaism should be included and the question is why? Because of "cultural associations" from 2000 years ago. So why are people rejecting Islamic overlap from 1000 years ago? It makes no sense.
Popular
Back to top


0






