- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:41 pm to Fun Bunch
Sounds like a Republican president is the only way to fix this shite.
Isn't the border #1 or #2 driving forces in the election? Maddening but plays well for Trump.
Isn't the border #1 or #2 driving forces in the election? Maddening but plays well for Trump.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:41 pm to RaginCajunz
quote:
Maddening but plays well for Trump
There is no such thing as an undecided voter. Remember that.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:42 pm to Fun Bunch
Oh man, that's not good. Many will see this as SCOTUS siding with this Marxist federal government and only raise tensions more.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:42 pm to Fun Bunch
Taking the long-term view here. If border security were up to individual states, it would give an opening for states like communist California to ignore Federal immigration law with impunity (assuming border security is ever actually enforced).
The problem is the lack of enforcement of existing Federal law and this is not fixed by Texas' actions. This doesn't help the parents of children raped and murdered by illegals or dying from fentanyl, I know. This country is fricked.
The problem is the lack of enforcement of existing Federal law and this is not fixed by Texas' actions. This doesn't help the parents of children raped and murdered by illegals or dying from fentanyl, I know. This country is fricked.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:43 pm to Fun Bunch
"And just like that, the border was secure, again"
- Joe Biden
- Joe Biden
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:44 pm to lazlodawg
I am of the opinion that if the Fed fails to carry out its Constitutional duty, then the State can enforce that duty.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:44 pm to udtiger
quote:
Abbot should refuse.
Period.
It's time to get this the frick over with.
Yup. This is the way.
This post was edited on 1/22/24 at 2:50 pm
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:44 pm to lazlodawg
quote:
Taking the long-term view here. If border security were up to individual states, it would give an opening for states like communist California to ignore Federal immigration law with impunity (assuming border security is ever actually enforced).
You mean like they already do?
The fix is in. If a state wants to ignore immigration law, it is free to do so. If a state tries to enforce the safety of the border, it is not allowed to do so.
Furthermore, it must bear the costs of infrastructure, education, crime and medical provisions for those immigrants that they were not allowed to keep from entering.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:45 pm to udtiger
quote:
Abbot should refuse.
Period.
Would be interesting to see him force the administrations hand here.
What measure would the Biden Admin be willing to go to?
That could play heavily in favour of freedom and liberty in the upcoming election. I think this band of federal idiots in charge now could be easily set up for a major blunder of over reaction.
This post was edited on 1/22/24 at 2:48 pm
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:46 pm to John Coctostan
quote:
ACB has been a disappointment.
Kavanaugh has only been slightly less disappointing.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:46 pm to lazlodawg
quote:
it would give an opening for states like communist California to ignore Federal immigration law with impunity
Oh sweet summer child, do you know about sanctuary cities?
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:47 pm to Snipe
quote:
What measure would the Biden Admin be willing to go to?
F-16s
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:49 pm to Fun Bunch
Oh I 100% agree with you. I'm just trying to rationalize the decision. It's fricked up.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:50 pm to GoblinGuide
quote:You should not be.
but a bit surprised to see ACB join in.
The feminine urge to 'help' is part of her DNA, she simply can't help it.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:50 pm to CamdenTiger
You left off the important bit in your attempt at a zing.
quote:
impunity (assuming border security is ever actually enforced).
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:52 pm to Fun Bunch
Id respond with "Any federal agents caught removing razor wire will be arrested"
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:52 pm to lazlodawg
Taking the long-term view here. If border security were up to individual states, it would give an opening for states like communist California to ignore Federal immigration law with impunity (assuming border security is ever actually enforced).
The problem is the lack of enforcement of existing Federal law and this is not fixed by Texas' actions. This doesn't help the parents of children raped and murdered by illegals or dying from fentanyl, I know. This country is fricked.
Isn't that what California did during Trump's administration? CA thumbed their nose to the federal govt authority by arguing the state did not have to assist the federal govt. CA went so far as to ban border contractors from state contracts.
The problem is the lack of enforcement of existing Federal law and this is not fixed by Texas' actions. This doesn't help the parents of children raped and murdered by illegals or dying from fentanyl, I know. This country is fricked.
Isn't that what California did during Trump's administration? CA thumbed their nose to the federal govt authority by arguing the state did not have to assist the federal govt. CA went so far as to ban border contractors from state contracts.
Posted on 1/22/24 at 2:53 pm to BugAC
Page 3 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News