- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Rep. Tim Burchett: Thomas Crooks was groomed by the CIA
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:29 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:29 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Oh, I believe the CIA could be involved but they wouldnt choose a dipshit like Crooks.
Some are overthinking this.
Why? Because he had pimples? He looks like a prime candidate to me.
He would have made the shot if not for Trump turning and moving at the last second. It wasn't his lack of ability to take that shot that caused the failure.
I don't know if that is what happened obviously, but no way in hell would I dismiss the possibility. Especially combined with the multiple breakdowns in security that also had to happen at the same time.
1
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:is more likely to tell the truth than barracks lawyer
Rep. Tim Burchett
quote:
SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:31 pm to TFH
He was trying to run interference for Rs. Trying to avoid Dems forcing them to vote on the record, which is the point, and exactly what Dems should and will do.
But that doesn't stop the mouth breathers all over this board from saying, "SeE, DeMS BloCKeD thE VOte!"
But that doesn't stop the mouth breathers all over this board from saying, "SeE, DeMS BloCKeD thE VOte!"
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:31 pm to hawgfaninc
It was leaked early on that Crooks had called a cell phone located in the China Town area of DC near Capital One Arena dozens of times in the period leading up to the attack.
Further analysis found that the location of the phone corresponded to a known intel related field office in that neighborhood.
Was that false? Entirely possible.
Do I believe any of them after Epstein and all of the evidence that was seized with him apparently disappeared and no further arrests were made? Absolutely not.
I’m not alleging Bongino or Patel are lying, I’m stating flat out that evidence seems to be misplaced anytime something starts pointing back towards the vicinity of Langley, VA.
Further analysis found that the location of the phone corresponded to a known intel related field office in that neighborhood.
Was that false? Entirely possible.
Do I believe any of them after Epstein and all of the evidence that was seized with him apparently disappeared and no further arrests were made? Absolutely not.
I’m not alleging Bongino or Patel are lying, I’m stating flat out that evidence seems to be misplaced anytime something starts pointing back towards the vicinity of Langley, VA.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:31 pm to hawgfaninc
Is he the same guy who said Iran had a drone mothership parked off our east coast?
It is hard to keep the whackadoos straight sometimes.
It is hard to keep the whackadoos straight sometimes.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:36 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:
Is he the same guy who said Iran had a drone mothership parked off our east coast?
No...that was Jeff Van Drew (NJ) but Burchett constantly misrepresents facts regarding UAP/UFO activity.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:49 pm to hawgfaninc
Isn't Burchett the goober who thought the drones were from an Iranian ship off the east coast last spring?
I see above that he wasnt. He's a UAP goober.
I see above that he wasnt. He's a UAP goober.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 2:51 pm
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:53 pm to RelicBatches86
quote:
the CIA must have fallen on some hard times if he was an asset
He was expendable and on a suicide mission. They wouldn't have used somebody well-trained and traceable back to the government. They used an odd loner type kid that fits a specific profile, so people would be led to say exactly what you said. And if not for a last-second turn of the head, Crooks would have succeeded.
There are too many holes in the official narrative. I don't know who he is connected to, but he was not just a random kid who luckily managed to get into a president's rally with a rifle.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:54 pm to 3down10
quote:
Because he had pimples?
Because he was an amateur and bad shot.
CIA aren't dumping resources into a clown like that
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:54 pm to RelicBatches86
quote:
the CIA must have fallen on some hard times if he was an asset
Kinda like when they made Oswald an asset?
Posted on 11/14/25 at 2:57 pm to Clyde Tipton
quote:
The investigation, conducted by over 480 FBI employees, revealed Crooks had limited online and in person interactions, planned and conducted the attack alone, and did not leak or share his intent to engage in the attack with anyone.
Is this is true, what is the rationale for keeping any of it under wrap still?
Posted on 11/14/25 at 3:01 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Because he was an amateur and bad shot.
CIA aren't dumping resources into a clown like that
He wasn't a bad shot at all. Bad at predicting the future and how Trump would turn as he takes the shot - yes.
This post was edited on 11/14/25 at 3:03 pm
Posted on 11/14/25 at 3:06 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Is this is true, what is the rationale for keeping any of it under wrap still?
The Contagion Effect.
We learned the lesson of the power of this with that psychopath who killed the little kids in church in Minnesota a few months ago.
Posted on 11/14/25 at 3:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The Contagion Effect.
We learned the lesson of the power of this with that psychopath who killed the little kids in church in Minnesota a few months ago.
How is that any way contingent on keeping the general public ignorant and in the dark on the backgrounds of these people?
Posted on 11/14/25 at 3:14 pm to hawgfaninc
i can't stress this enough
tim burchett is dumb as a stump
tim burchett is dumb as a stump
Posted on 11/14/25 at 3:14 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Because he had pimples?
Because he was an amateur and bad shot.
CIA aren't dumping resources into a clown like that
Except this guy is the exact kind of patsy the CIA would setup. Plausible deniability does in fact cost resources, and the CIA has so many, I doubt Crooks would've put a dent into their budget.
quote:
Especially combined with the multiple breakdowns in security that also had to happen at the same time.
Posted on 11/15/25 at 7:35 am to 3down10
quote:
He wasn't a bad shot at all.
Sure he was. People think trump turning his head caused the miss. Not true, the shot was off regardless.
Posted on 11/15/25 at 7:37 am to hawgfaninc
Does Burchett have any actual evidence? That would be a nice addition to the conversation.
Posted on 11/15/25 at 7:39 am to Stealth Matrix
quote:
Except this guy is the exact kind of patsy the CIA would setup
When actual evidence comes out, it can be discussed. Right now, there is no evidence, just a few attention whores spreading conspiracies.
Posted on 11/15/25 at 7:40 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
Is this is true, what is the rationale for keeping any of it under wrap still?
Probably to keep people from understanding that a motivated, only-halfway-skillful person can be a serious threat to kill someone. Even if that someone is important. We’ve had the CEO of UHC and one of the leading political commentators killed in the past 12 months and two relatively close calls with the President.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News