RollTide4547

Yep. He's the love child of liz cheney and Adam kinzinger

The followers of that peaceful religion are way more of a threat than the Jews

quote:

---

I understand you’re having a difficult time keeping up.

---

Ouch that hurts. Can't refute the argument, so you personally attack? That's mighty liberal of ya.

quote:

---

And that, by your repeatedly stated logic, is the only reason it’s wrong to you.

---

Nope. Put the emotion away and you can see. The fact that is it illegal is why I'm fine with the gubment intruding into families, if they are committing the illegal action.

There are many things in the world that are legal, but I find repulsive, wrong and I do not participate. Take the board here's favorite word "cuck". I personally choose not to participate in it, but it is not illegal. If someone else, (say you) wants to watch their wife get railed its none of the gubment's business (or mine) because it's not illegal to do so. On the other hand, if someone on here (say you) likes to rent his 12 y/o daughter out to his friends as a sex slave so he can pay his rent and buy beer, that is the gubment's business because renting out your kid as a sex slave is illegal. If you were my neighbor and I knew what you were doing, I'd get involved and call the cops. I personally find BOTH to be repulsive, but only believe the gubment needs to be involved in punishing people for doing ONE of them. It is not my job to force my moral view on someone else. It is the job of the house/senate to make the laws, not me.

quote:

---

A man who watches a BBC take his wife while he cries in the corner.

---

My guess is that he'd pounding away on his little pecker and then rushing in to clean up after her boyfriend fills her up.

quote:

---

I don't recall ever seeing anyone dig themselves into a hole like this before.

---

Frick you. All you have is personal attacks. You can't attack the argument because we both know I'm right on the argument and you're not willing to do the work necessary to change the law.

You are perfectly fine with punishing parents for doing things (transitioning kids) that you (and I) don't agree with right now (but those actions are not against the law). Punishing them simply because our "moral code" deems the parents actions are wrong. In a few years, if the dem lovers of that "peaceful religion" took power and decided that we could no longer could have women walking the streets showing anything but their eyes, neither of us would like that. The followers of that "peaceful" religion would be justified in punishing us for violating the new rules because their "peaceful" religion deemed those actions immoral (justification would be because of what you want to do here).

quote:

---

I’m glad he backed off, but I’m not going to praise Donnie or whoever posted it for rescinding it.

---

What would you praise Donaldus Maximus for?

quote:

---

The flaw in your argument that you just can’t seem to grasp is that something can be legal and still be wrong.

---

The flaw in YOUR argument is that who gets to decide what is wrong, if not the law makers? If followers of that peaceful religion get in charge (like in NYC), are you ok with them punishing you for doing things that they don't like and are not illegal?

quote:

---

Your argument is that the only reason fricking kids is wrong is because it’s illegal. Is the law the only thing holding you back from fricking a kid?

---

Not at all. There are lots of things that are legal that I don't partake in. I'm much more interested in MILF's and GILF's than kids. The only reason that the gubment can force someone to not do something is because of the law.

You are a good shite-talker on the Internet. Not so good with English language usage.

He had a meat sickle to service

Are my neighbors breaking the law or not? If they're not, it's none of my business.i sure as hell want them to keep their nose out of my business. If I suspect they are breaking, then I call the cops.