Started By
Message

re: Obama breaks law by not notifying congress before taliban swap

Posted on 6/1/14 at 5:19 am to
Posted by mauser
Orange Beach
Member since Nov 2008
26943 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 5:19 am to
He's too stupid to know that he's stupid.
Posted by ClydeFrog
Kenya
Member since Jul 2012
3261 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 6:11 am to
quote:

When he signed the law last year, Obama issued a signing statement contending that the notification requirement was an unconstitutional infringement on his powers as commander in chief and that he therefore could override it.


Is that statement public record or just according to this administration source?
Posted by StraightCashHomey21
Aberdeen,NC
Member since Jul 2009
126745 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 6:20 am to
quote:

They will now start capturing them.




um this guy went off the reservation

They have been trying to capture men in combat for a while.
Posted by Tigah in the ATL
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2005
27539 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 6:57 am to
Why was there no bitching about a prisoner swap until this thread?
Posted by EST
Investigating
Member since Oct 2003
18290 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 7:36 am to
quote:

Obama breaks law


Again

The dude should be in impeached, thrown out of office, and thrown in prison. But, he has certain skin pigment so he can do whatever he wants.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85104 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 7:38 am to
quote:

The law requires the defense secretary to notify relevant congressional committees at least 30 days before making any transfers of prisoners


Wouldn't the Defense Secretary, Chuck Hagel, be the one breaking the law
Posted by Jim Ignatowski
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2013
1383 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 7:56 am to
quote:

The dude should be in impeached, thrown out of office, and thrown in prison. But, he has certain skin pigment so he can do whatever he wants.


.....in the politically correct world we live in today.....this is so true.
If the day ever comes when commen sense is the order of the day ....American's will shake their collective heads and wonder..."what were we thinking?"
Posted by goatmilker
Castle Anthrax
Member since Feb 2009
76516 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 8:03 am to
He should watch the news to see what he can or can not do.
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
39709 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 8:13 am to
Wonder how long before the next kidnapping...and swap offer, now that the precedent has been set?

And when I heard Obama (at the presser announcing the swap) say that "we never leave our own behind".... I wonder what the SEAL on that roof in Benghazi would think.

God help us!
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
55454 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 8:44 am to
quote:

And when I heard Obama (at the presser announcing the swap) say that "we never leave our own behind".... I wonder what the SEAL on that roof in Benghazi would think.


That SEAL was most likely getting in the way of something more important.
Posted by monsterballads
Gulf of America
Member since Jun 2013
31513 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:33 am to
quote:

He doesn't have to ask permission from congress.


Actually he does, per law.
Posted by EZE Tiger Fan
Member since Jul 2004
55454 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:37 am to
quote:

He doesn't have to ask permission from congress. Actually he does, per law.


Laws do not matter to Obama and his ilk.

Hell, he even breaks the laws that have his name on them. Obamacare? Some people have to follow it, his pals don't.....

Some people pay the taxes for it, others don't....

Dozens of examples with that one alone.

As long as Obama is "winning", or making the political enemies of the progs hurt, that is all that matters to people like Layabout.
Posted by Holden Caulfield
Hanging with J.D.
Member since May 2008
8308 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:50 am to
For a law to exist the breath of Obama must blown into its nostrils. Without the breath of Obama in its lungs a law shall shrivel and die away.
Posted by monsterballads
Gulf of America
Member since Jun 2013
31513 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 9:59 am to
quote:

As long as Obama is "winning", or making the political enemies of the progs hurt, that is all that matters to people like Layabout.


It's quite sad
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 10:05 am to
Happy for Bergdahl and his family but objectively this seems like a bad move setting a negative precedent.
Posted by jorconalx
alexandria
Member since Aug 2011
11058 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Happy for Bergdahl and his family


guess you haven't read up on this dude. He was a deserter and sympathizer. frick him and his family
Posted by catnip
Member since Sep 2003
16378 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 10:41 am to
He's the presidenti. He doesn't have to follow laws, just ask him.
Posted by Layabout
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2011
11082 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 11:28 am to
quote:

Actually he does, per law.

The constitution trumps statutes.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115462 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 11:38 am to
So, he granted them a presidential pardon? You do realize there's a lot more to that action that just a nod or waive of a pen.

Where's the pretty piece of paper with Obama's original signature on it?
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
37341 posts
Posted on 6/1/14 at 11:39 am to
quote:

The law requires the defense secretary to notify relevant congressional committees at least 30 days before making any transfers of prisoners, to explain the reason and to provide assurances that those released would not be in a position to reengage in activities that could threaten the United States or its interests.
That law would be dead on delivery if it was challenged to the USSC.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram