- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Obama breaks law by not notifying congress before taliban swap
Posted on 6/2/14 at 8:50 pm to USMCTiger03
Posted on 6/2/14 at 8:50 pm to USMCTiger03
I don't see a difference. Their both words that give thanks to a supernatural being. And technically the same being. But, getting back on topic, I don't know anything about the dad, but the son is a baby back bitch and I assume that dad is too and converted to Islam to try and relate to his capturers.
This post was edited on 6/2/14 at 8:52 pm
0
Posted on 6/3/14 at 7:25 am to mmcgrath
quote:
mmcgrath
Obama breaks law by not notifying congress before taliban swap
quote:
a pack of chewing gum never conspired to kill anyone.
I am not convinced that these 5 prisoners did either.
AM I the only one who read this?
They must be putting idiot pills in the water in New Jersey.
mmcgrath you REALLY don't think the 5 taliban leaders conspired to kill anyone???
Wow.
Posted on 6/3/14 at 7:53 am to TygerTyger
he's buried so deep. he cannot be objective at all.
Posted on 6/3/14 at 8:21 am to monsterballads
quote:
Lawmakers were not notified of the Guantanamo detainees’ transfer until after it occurred.
Force obama to resign, if he refuses then impeach him. At this point, anything is better than obama, even "The Joker" Biden. If America allows this flagrant violation of this law [a law that obama signed] then we are no longer a Constiutional Republic and obama is king.
Think about those six brave men who gave their lives searching for the traitor Bergdahl. At least one of these brave men {Private 1st Class Morris Walker] was killed by an IED roadside bomb. Since we now have evidence Bergdahl was consorting with his [supposed] captors to teach them how to assemble bombs did one of Bergdahl's students trigger that roadside bomb? Further, did obama know of Bergdahl desertion and treasonous behavior before he agreed to the prisoner swap. Inquiring minds want to know.
We need answers. No more evasive answers or stonewalling. The truth!
IMPEACH BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA NOW!
This post was edited on 6/3/14 at 9:30 am
Posted on 6/3/14 at 9:01 am to Matrixman
quote:
obama is king
sure does appear that way, doesn't it?
Posted on 6/3/14 at 9:16 am to monsterballads
Has anyone on this thread argued that the President did the right thing by making this swap? Sure, he saved a soldier's life ( 
), but at what cost?
I am yet to hear the other side of this, and am curious to hear what the Obama-supporters have to say on this issue. If anyone has a link to an article, I'd appreciate it.
), but at what cost? I am yet to hear the other side of this, and am curious to hear what the Obama-supporters have to say on this issue. If anyone has a link to an article, I'd appreciate it.
Posted on 6/3/14 at 9:17 am to Matrixman
quote:
Force obama to resign, if he refuses then impeach him. At this point, anything is better than obama, even "The Joker" Biden. If America allows this flagrant violation of this law [a law that obama signed] then we are no longer a Constiutional Republic and obama is king.
Holy hyperbole, Batman!
[cue the obamabot response
]Posted on 6/3/14 at 9:18 am to boosiebadazz
so he didn't break the law?
Posted on 6/3/14 at 9:21 am to monsterballads
He did. That law may very well be unconstitutional, though.
Do we want to open up the Pandora's Box of impeachment for breaking a law that may very well end up being unconstitutional?
Do we want to open up the Pandora's Box of impeachment for breaking a law that may very well end up being unconstitutional?
Posted on 6/3/14 at 9:35 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
Holy hyperbole, Batman!
Well bossiebadazz what brings you out of the cesspool today? What's the matter.....your pal obama screwed up and you can't defend his actions so you do what all liberals do....attack the messenger? Are you happy that six brave men died to save your hero Bergdahl?
We're waiting.......
This post was edited on 6/3/14 at 9:39 am
Posted on 6/3/14 at 9:39 am to monsterballads
quote:
Obama breaks law by not notifying congress
For what's it worth this has nothing to do with Obama specifically, or Republican vs Democrat. This all about the long battle between the Executive and the Legislative branches trying to get as much power as possible.
Posted on 6/3/14 at 9:42 am to Matrixman
I'm just not sure we want to open the Pandora's Box of impeaching Presidents for breaking laws that very may well be found to be unconstitutional.
However, I know you give zero fricks about that becuase all you're worried about is removing Obama from office, so I don't expect you to share my same reservations about the precedent this would set.
However, I know you give zero fricks about that becuase all you're worried about is removing Obama from office, so I don't expect you to share my same reservations about the precedent this would set.
This post was edited on 6/3/14 at 9:43 am
Posted on 6/3/14 at 9:45 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
unconstitutional
can you go further into detail?
Posted on 6/3/14 at 9:49 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
I'm just not sure we want to open the Pandora's Box of impeaching Presidents for breaking laws that very may well be found to be unconstitutional.
Well the president should fight it at the USSC. He signed the law. He shouldn't have signed it if he didn't think it was constitutional. This is the problem with our laws today. They must be enforced.
Posted on 6/3/14 at 9:50 am to monsterballads
The argument from the Administration is that the President is the Commander-in-Chief responsible for leading our military operations and the ability to release prisoners or detainess in order to secure the release of American servicemen falls squarely under his powers as Commander-in-Chief and Congress cannot imfringe on that authority.
It's a plausible argument and one that needs to be litigated up the the Supreme Court. They should throw the War Powers Resolution in there for review, too.
It's a plausible argument and one that needs to be litigated up the the Supreme Court. They should throw the War Powers Resolution in there for review, too.
Posted on 6/3/14 at 9:51 am to boosiebadazz
do you understand what the 30 day laws' intention is?
Posted on 6/3/14 at 9:51 am to C
The problem was that it was included in the massive NDAA bill. He included a signing statement that touched on the 30 days notice provision, but that doesn't have the power of law.
It's all a convoluted mess.
It's all a convoluted mess.
Posted on 6/3/14 at 9:52 am to monsterballads
I'd imagine it is to keep Congress in the loop, but go ahead and enlighten me.
Posted on 6/3/14 at 9:55 am to Matrixman
quote:
Are you happy that six brave men died to save your hero Bergdahl?
C'mon now. You and I both know those 6 men knew such missions were a part of their job when they signed up.
Posted on 6/3/14 at 9:58 am to boosiebadazz
Boosie Boosie Boosie... WHEN will you learn, what's good for prior presidents is NOT what's good for Obama! We must hold him to a greater level than past presidents because, well, he fills out an NCAA bracket.
LINK
quote:
President George W. Bush made the constitutional challenges within signing statements (in)famous by citing problems with approximately 1,200 provisions of legislation; double the amount of all the previous presidents combined. Those challenges can be found within Bush’s 112 first-term statements and his 50 second-term statements.
LINK
Page 6 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News