re: Navy Sailor Who Jumped Off USS Abraham Lincoln Faces Disciplinary Charges, Could Lose Pay

quote:

---

A 19-year-old U.S. Navy sailor assigned to the air wing on the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN 72) who went overboard on August 3, 2026, is facing non-judicial punishment (NJP, also known as Captain’s Mast in the Navy) under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for alleged violations of Article 83 (malingering) and Article 86 (absence without leave).

military.com

The information comes primarily from the sailor’s wife (who spoke anonymously) and charging documents reviewed by MS NOW (and reported across outlets including Military.com, UPI, Mediaite, and others). The Navy has not publicly named the sailor or released detailed official confirmation of the specific charges, citing privacy and standard practices. A Navy spokesperson has confirmed one sailor went overboard in early August, was quickly recovered by an air-wing search-and-rescue helicopter, treated aboard the ship, and transferred for follow-on care; family notification followed policy. CENTCOM has described the incident as a sailor who “fell overboard” and was safely recovered, while denying any overall increase in suicidal ideations or attempts on the ship.

snopes.com

Key Details of the Incident and AftermathThe sailor spent roughly an hour in the water before rescue. He was medically evacuated and returned to San Diego around August 13, then spent about five days at Naval Medical Center San Diego (Balboa). According to his wife, he received monitoring of vital signs but did not see a psychiatrist or therapist during that stay; he was ordered to return to work immediately afterward. His first therapy appointment was reportedly on or around August 26.

upi.com

His wife has described the jump as a suicide attempt amid the carrier’s extended deployment (over 250 consecutive days at sea without a port call at the time of reports, related to operations involving Iran). She said he had repeatedly raised mental health concerns with his chain of command and medical personnel (and requested paternity leave after the birth of their daughter in February, which was denied). Pre-incident texts referenced the ship “finally getting to me” and doubts about finishing the deployment. The couple (both 19) have a young son as well. She criticized the disciplinary action as adding stress instead of providing help.

mediaite.com

The Specific UCMJ ChargesArticle 83 (Malingering): Any person subject to the UCMJ who, with intent to avoid work, duty, or service, (1) feigns illness, physical disablement, mental lapse, or mental derangement; or (2) intentionally inflicts self-injury. The charging documents reportedly apply this in the context of the jump being viewed as self-injury or related conduct to avoid duty. Maximum punishments at court-martial can include confinement (up to 1–5 years or more depending on factors like self-injury vs. feigning, and potential aggravation in a hostile-fire zone or wartime), dishonorable discharge, and total forfeitures, but this case is proceeding as NJP rather than court-martial.

uscodeweb1.house.gov

Article 86 (Absence without leave / AWOL): Failure to be at a required place of duty without proper authorization. This appears tied to the sailor leaving his post by going overboard.

military.com

Note that Article 87 also addresses missing movement or jumping from a vessel, but reports consistently cite Articles 83 and 86 based on the reviewed documents.Process and Potential PunishmentThis is non-judicial punishment under Article 15 of the UCMJ, handled by a commanding officer at Captain’s Mast rather than a formal court-martial (which could produce a criminal conviction). NJP is typically used for more minor offenses and allows the service member to avoid a full trial process. According to the charging documents, possible outcomes include forfeiture of up to half of normal pay (among other administrative measures like restriction, extra duties, or reduction in rank, depending on the commander’s decision and the sailor’s rank).

ms.now

Military legal experts have noted that the Manual for Courts-Martial generally advises against charging bona fide suicide attempts, but the decision to pursue action remains at the discretion of the commanding officer. A Navy official, when asked about disciplinary action in such cases, stated the service is “fully committed to the health and wellbeing of every Sailor,” emphasizes removing barriers to seeking help, provides 24/7 mental health resources, and views asking for help as a sign of strength.

ms.now

The broader context involves reports (and official pushback) about morale, living conditions, extended sea time, and mental health on the Abraham Lincoln during its prolonged deployment. The Navy and CENTCOM have disputed characterizations of a widespread crisis or spike in attempts while acknowledging the one confirmed overboard incident and that long deployments are challenging.

Details remain limited because the sailor has not been publicly identified, official statements prioritize privacy, and the case is administrative rather than a public court-martial. Reports are based on the wife’s account and documents she shared or that were reviewed by journalists. For the latest or official updates, primary Navy or DoD channels would be the authoritative source. If you or someone you know is in crisis, contact the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline.

---

quote:

---

Read what grok said above. Sounds like bottom line the wife's mouth is inappropriate and plain stupidity. She thinks that if she declares their business of suicide it will lesson or remove the charges.

Media isn't helping either.

---

quote:

---

US officials told CNN that the sailor who went overboard on August 3 was wearing a life vest (also described as a life jacket in some reports), was not injured, and was recovered within about an hour by an air-wing search-and-rescue helicopter. The Navy treated it as a mental health episode; he was evaluated aboard the ship and later transferred for follow-on care.

cnn.com

On the wife and naming. There are reports involving more than one family member of sailors connected to overboard or attempted-overboard incidents on the USS Abraham Lincoln during the extended deployment.Annabelle Loma (full first and last name) spoke publicly to Military Times/Navy Times around August 11. She described her husband attempting to jump overboard, being on medical hold, fearing a dishonorable discharge after a 13-year career, and the family having three children. Media outlets widely amplified her account in mid-August coverage of morale, conditions, and multiple reported attempts to go overboard.

militarytimes.com

The sailor facing the current UCMJ non-judicial punishment (the August 3 incident) has a wife who has spoken to MS NOW (and related coverage) under anonymity “to discuss sensitive disciplinary actions” / protect privacy. She and the sailor are both described as 19; they have a roughly 3½-year-old son and a daughter born in February while he was deployed.

Details (ages, children, paternity leave requests, specific texts about the boat “finally getting to me,” timing of medical evacuation to San Diego/Balboa, and the charging documents) consistently match this couple in the discipline stories, not the Loma details.

ms.now

The mid-August family accounts (including Loma’s named interview) fueled broader coverage critical of the deployment’s length, living conditions, and mental health support under the current administration. The more recent discipline story (charges of Article 83 malingering and Article 86 absence without leave, potential pay forfeiture at Captain’s Mast) is a distinct development based on the anonymous wife’s statements plus the charging documents she shared or that were reviewed.

Why media coverage spiked around the “suicide”/discipline angle now

The discipline story broke as an MS NOW exclusive around August 26–27 (with rapid pickup by Military.com, UPI, The Daily Beast, Telegraph, and others on the 27th–28th). It is newsworthy because:It involves formal UCMJ action (NJP, not court-martial) against a service member for what his wife characterizes as a suicide attempt, raising questions about how the military balances mental-health support versus discipline for self-injury or leaving one’s post.

It lands amid ongoing scrutiny of the Abraham Lincoln’s record-long continuous time at sea, family complaints about conditions/morale, official denials of any spike in suicidal ideation, political pushback from the administration, and related stories (including a lawsuit over Stars and Stripes reporting).

Coverage aggregates and reframes the earlier overboard/mental-health reports with the new charging angle. Outlets differ in emphasis (some stress the wife’s criticism of the Navy’s response; others note the Navy’s general statements affirming commitment to sailor well-being and resources). There is no single unified “media” motive beyond standard news cycle dynamics on a high-profile military story with human, policy, and political dimensions.

Official Navy/CENTCOM statements have confirmed one sailor went overboard (sometimes phrased as “fell”) on/around August 3, was recovered safely, and denied a broader increase in suicidal ideations/attempts, while declining fuller details on individuals for privacy reasons. Exact identities and some circumstances remain limited in public reporting.

3 web pages

---