- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: More evidence of a setup on J6, but this part didn’t go according to plan.
Posted on 1/29/25 at 6:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/29/25 at 6:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
And this occurred and...the police did nothing
What is the plausible explanation for why a J6 Insurrectionist would have pointed a gun at LE and not have been charged given all of the other charges we’ve seen?
1
Posted on 1/29/25 at 7:45 pm to moneyg
quote:
What is the plausible explanation for why a J6 Insurrectionist would have pointed a gun at LE and not have been charged given all of the other charges we’ve seen?
Perhaps if it wasn't a gun.
Posted on 1/29/25 at 8:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm more shocked the same police who were orchestrating this plan were also the ones who agreed to be shot
Handguns can shoot blanks or rubber bullets.
I guess knowing if that guy went to jail would be a start. The first group in and points a gun at officers on camera. Should be one of the ones that was rounded up.
Posted on 1/29/25 at 8:42 pm to FlexDawg
Maybe the gun and the mag were props or loaded with blanks. Couldn't shoot without the mag.
Maybe some of the cops were in on it.
Maybe who knows?
Maybe some of the cops were in on it.
Maybe who knows?
Posted on 1/29/25 at 9:11 pm to diehard24
quote:
1) why would they plant evidence in an public building in full view of security camera that they would have obviously known about???
They weren’t worried about the cameras, took forever to get SOME video released.
People went to trial and were convicted, their defense didn’t have access to most of this video.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 6:18 am to TS1926
No qualified person does the first one which opens the door for 2 and 3 in your post.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 7:23 am to ThuperThumpin
quote:
Perhaps if it wasn't a gun.
The most logical conclusion
Posted on 1/30/25 at 7:43 am to diehard24
quote:
1) why would they plant evidence in an public building in full view of security camera that they would have obviously known about???
Dems don’t care, they knew Trump was out. They charging and arresting people that were in the crowd Jan6. But the bomber was on camera and still no arrest.
Every inch of the White House under surveillance, still no arrest for the cocaine.
All they do is lie, manufacture evidence and bury shite against themselves.
This post was edited on 1/30/25 at 7:45 am
Posted on 1/30/25 at 7:55 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm more shocked the same police who were orchestrating this plan were also the ones who agreed to be shot.
Could it have been a magazine full of blanks?
Posted on 1/30/25 at 8:00 am to WylieTiger
quote:
Could it have been a magazine full of blanks?
What would blanks provide that pointing a gun at LEO doesn't?
Posted on 1/30/25 at 8:06 am to ThuperThumpin
Its pretty clearly a gun.. at least the one by the door. Assume they didn't react because they clearly planted it and knew it was unloaded with no magazine.
The only thing that makes sense there is further agitation and incitement, or they were planting evidence in an attempt to maximize charges or feed the "armed insurrection" narrative that was peddled early on.
Either way, at this stage, its hard to make the argument that the feds and police didnt have an agenda.
The only thing that makes sense there is further agitation and incitement, or they were planting evidence in an attempt to maximize charges or feed the "armed insurrection" narrative that was peddled early on.
Either way, at this stage, its hard to make the argument that the feds and police didnt have an agenda.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 8:07 am to FlexDawg
That video establishes nothing. It certainly has nothing to do with thugs beating officers with flagpoles and spraying bear spray after ripping away officers’ face protection.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 8:09 am to VOR
yeah because officers bracing for an angry mob attack ALWAYS drop guns and magazines on the ground 
Posted on 1/30/25 at 8:27 am to FlexDawg
This video is hilarious. Its clear with the selective blurring and zooming that they are intentionally hiding what actually happened
1) As the cop walks away, he had his left hand on his mic, resting on his shoulder. You can see his right arm doesnt move. The zoom doesnt allow you to see the "toss of the mag" as claimed. When the camera is zoomed out, there is the same cop with his hand on his mic. Still. The object is likely thrown thru a broken window instead
2) The video always blurs when they claim they see a mag or a gun, yet when you see the 2nd angle, whatever is on the floor fell out of the hand of the person breaking the window.
3) When the supposed shooter picks up the object you can clearly see that after pointing it, he tucks it in his back pocket. When he enters nothing in his pocket. When he tucks "the gun" something is now in his right rear pocket. Most likely his cell phone
4) Notice how the video is intentionally zoomed in when the crowd enters, so you that cant see the supposed gunman? If you look carefully, he already has on the orange hat, and it is knocked off his head. Thats what he keeps looking down for. After he retrieves it, he puts it back on
1) As the cop walks away, he had his left hand on his mic, resting on his shoulder. You can see his right arm doesnt move. The zoom doesnt allow you to see the "toss of the mag" as claimed. When the camera is zoomed out, there is the same cop with his hand on his mic. Still. The object is likely thrown thru a broken window instead
2) The video always blurs when they claim they see a mag or a gun, yet when you see the 2nd angle, whatever is on the floor fell out of the hand of the person breaking the window.
3) When the supposed shooter picks up the object you can clearly see that after pointing it, he tucks it in his back pocket. When he enters nothing in his pocket. When he tucks "the gun" something is now in his right rear pocket. Most likely his cell phone
4) Notice how the video is intentionally zoomed in when the crowd enters, so you that cant see the supposed gunman? If you look carefully, he already has on the orange hat, and it is knocked off his head. Thats what he keeps looking down for. After he retrieves it, he puts it back on
Posted on 1/30/25 at 8:55 am to Kjnstkmn
quote:
they were waiting unconcerned until he opened fire first ineffectively but he couldn’t find the planted mag, luckily for him.
The only logical interpretation if one believes the information related in the video to be factually correct.
lots of fuzzy images. no clear definition of gun/magazine to my eyes based on these images.
lots of screwy stuff that has no rational information nonetheless.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 8:55 am to CAD703X
quote:
this defies explanation
No it doesn't. It was fake as a motherfricker.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 9:00 am to FlexDawg
AI created video? It has to a serious consideration these days. The narrator's voice sounds like it's AI generated.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 9:02 am to riverdiver
quote:
Fire a couple of rounds, cause panic and confusion. Lend credence to the theory that bloodthirsty insurrectionists were attacking.
This right here!
Posted on 1/30/25 at 9:06 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
s pretty clearly a gun.. at least the one by the door. Assume they didn't react because they clearly planted it and knew it was unloaded with no magazine.
I dont think its clear at all....but lets say it is..why didnt the other protestors react either? If I'm protesting in front of police and someone pulls a gun out and points it at them Im hitting the deck cause he is about to get lit up. Unless this whole video is staged and everyone was in on it.
Posted on 1/30/25 at 10:09 am to ThuperThumpin
I'm not sure I understand your question.... They walk in and all see a magazine there on the ground. One of them sees it, extends his arms to keep the crowd from kicking it, then picks it up and extends it toward police, perhaps to make them aware? Then he continually looks around on the floor - presumably for the rest of the firearm. But, its just a magazine, so I'm not sure why you think it would illicit a deadly or fearful response.
What I think was clearly a gun was sitting immediately on the floor by the door that was breached and only visible in the second camera angle from behind. There's no indication of what happened to it and it may have been dropped by a protestor. Perhaps picked up by that same protestor as they got in?
The questions I have are why are police dropping magazines/firearms in this hallway? Trained officers dropping multiple firearms and walking repeatedly past it makes it clear that this wasn't just an accident. No one sucks at their job that badly.
What I think was clearly a gun was sitting immediately on the floor by the door that was breached and only visible in the second camera angle from behind. There's no indication of what happened to it and it may have been dropped by a protestor. Perhaps picked up by that same protestor as they got in?
The questions I have are why are police dropping magazines/firearms in this hallway? Trained officers dropping multiple firearms and walking repeatedly past it makes it clear that this wasn't just an accident. No one sucks at their job that badly.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News