Favorite team:Alabama 
Location:Alabama
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:Software Engineer
Number of Posts:11996
Registered on:12/29/2020
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Assuming we hold onto these commits/signees unlike Grifter Hollywood Smothers, Alabama got 2 sure thing starters on defense and 2 OL who were likely to start for Michigan's OL in 2026 until Sherrone failed to stay away from the sneaky snow bunnies then tried to kill himself with a butter knife because of it. We also seemingly got a whole new specialist battery (PK, P, and LS) but Talty is still around to keep that long snapper honest. :lol:

Finally, we are cornering the market on tight end project players. An important area to dominate.
shite man DJ was slinging it like Jimmy Johns but didn’t get caught. That’s why he had no NFL future. PI work franchises did on him had to be a wild to read for the GMs. Worst kept secret on campus in my day.
8-4. Hard schedule. Year 1 redevelopment issues
10 game season, sounds good to me but getting the broadcasters to eat the loss of the CCG is probably as much as the 16-team can float.
quote:

Needs to happen anyway.


I’ve got an idea. No CCGs, 16 teams. Play round 1 the first weekend of December

re: Are we really that broke?

Posted by Diego Ricardo on 1/12/26 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

Well the second part says it all no?

We aren't paying 4-6 millon on a QB and don't pay multiple skills players +2 million.

Even at the mention of these numbers we're considered out. Yet we have seen Michigan, Oregon, OSU, Texas, A&M, Texas Tech, Miami and even now LSU, ND and Indiana not even flinch because they have specific outside booster funding this.


If Russell is what we think he may be, we damn well may have to find 4+ million to keep him after 2026. That, of course, will come with some hard decisions or Byrne and DeBoer making a convincing beg of a big booster or seven.
quote:


Latham is a 5-tech like Renaud and Edrik Hill got snaps there as well (and as a 3 and a 4). Hill is versatile and really hoping to get Latham back….if that comes to fruition then they should be fine there:

5-tech: Latham/Renaud
3-tech: USC transfer/ Beaman (I think he’s really special)
Shade: Simmons/ MSU transfer/Faga

- Edrik Hill can give you snaps at the 3,4 and 5 techniques. That’s pretty solid imo.

Then of course you have Pierre and Hill as the 2-deep at the Edge/7-technique


I share your opinion on Beaman. Losing him early in the season was a blow. Hope he's fully ready to go when the 2026 rolls around.
I see some people say they'd like Sabb gone but I just feel like more snaps of experience goes for a lot in college these days. You just hope that eventually that experience reaches a breakthrough point where they really elevate their play.
Wilson is 250ish right? Wouldn't he be more of our edge position like Pierre or Hill than the strong side end position like Overton?

re: What the hell Bama

Posted by Diego Ricardo on 1/12/26 at 7:16 pm to
quote:

So do you think in a few years the Aggies will go to their stadium and beat them and the entire stadium will empty and we will sing the war hymn from their student section?

Cause that’s cool when that happens.


And then you turn the xbox off
Assuming Pierre is not going to the draft, we lost almost nothing in production. Thompkins is at worst a draw with Smith.

If Latham comes back we're super fine. If not I think Hill was already making it hard to believe Russaw was staying on the edge if he wanted starter snaps in 2026. I assume the staff would certainly loved to keep Russaw for what we thought he was worth. Ohio State thought he was worth more and told him a fit he liked better (I assume he will play edge there and not be moving WLB or MLB).

I'm more worried about the fact that Renaud is the only proven production we have at the SDE position. I think he has promise but we probably need two guys to rotate with him. May need a freshman to contribute there.

re: What the hell Bama

Posted by Diego Ricardo on 1/12/26 at 6:51 pm to
quote:

Then OSU is taking your defensive linemen?


Pierre came in when Russaw got injured and had more production in half a season than Russaw had in 1.5 seasons. Russaw got passed and was probably going to need to position change to stay on the field as a starter.

James Smith is really close with Russaw and went in the portal the next day after Russaw bounced.

Smith is the only loss of note there. He's not a playmaker but he's a guy.

The fact those two committed together giving real Miss Nancy and Aunt Fancy vibes.
quote:

Yep. Our best OL was why we couldn’t run the ball. LOL


He was really good but teams with a good 0/1 tech could overwhelm him physically sometimes. Strayhorn is more SEC prototypical center size. Of course part of our problem is neither guard position was solid so Brailsford was asked to do things he shouldn’t have been asked to do or just got hung out to dry. Overall, he was our best lineman. Valchos worked on a better OL unit. So small centers can work in the SEC.
He's going to hit some dates with the UA calendar for the Spring pretty soon if he's not signed and in classes. Gotta figure everyone else is getting closer on that too depending on semester start.

I figure schools have some VP that can sign that away if needed but who knows....
quote:

Takes a long time to get tanked on that.



You can trust that an alcoholic who relapsed ain't pussy footing it :lol:
Ty Haywood is almost certainly the best "non-starter-that-projects-to-start" OT prospect in the portal. This is a big win for our staff if it holds.
quote:

Given the USSC's ruling, this is pretty much impossible. I'm not knocking your POV. I just don't see an end that doesn't involve total destruction and rebuild from the ground up.



The one opening I see is that it seems that the combination of a natural business cycle, a clear over-speculation in AI that cannot possibility live up to the level investment, and some externalities could lead to a massive recession like 2008 in the next year or so. I think there are some attempts to push this past 2026 for electoral reasons by priming the pump with cheaper debt, but the reckoning is coming.

In that wake of that reckoning, a lot of the silly money out there is going to dry up. Much like the Crash of 1929 brought everyone down enough pegs that there was a more shared experience of the struggle - amplified by the younger generation who grew up in the wake of that crash fighting a global war - I suspect that the richest being brought low will change the calculus of everyone at the table. I don't think a period of legislation like the New Deal would have been possible without that leveling of socioeconomic hierarchy.

In this hypothetical moment, perhaps a cleaner solution that is better and more sustainable for all the interested parties will emerge in college football.