Favorite team:Alabama 
Location:Alabama
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:Software Engineer
Number of Posts:13572
Registered on:12/29/2020
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message

re: Get serious = victory

Posted by Diego Ricardo on 7/7/26 at 8:40 am to
quote:

That being said, I'm optimistic.


I’m not really pessimistic either. Probably more realistic than optimistic though. We’re a top 25 team with a shot at a playoff bid. That’s not a bad place to be and we need to be okay with that until they fix this sport. As long as your roster is up in the air every offseason and billionaires and millionaires can just buy anyone who responds to money (most people), you can’t just assume we’re going to win it all every year.
That's good to hear because I feel like we're a bit thin at guard and that's assuming Holloway is back on campus.
quote:

Trump has some news about Walmart


I don’t believe a single thing he says Walmart is doing will happen.
Crazy how this is going to keep on happening because 70-80yos can’t end their political careers and go the eff home
Can’t believe the guy with a nazi tat who roughed up at least one girlfriend in the past also did some rape.

re: Get serious = victory

Posted by Diego Ricardo on 7/6/26 at 3:45 pm to
We could be an 8-4 team or 10-2 team. I really just don’t know. You can’t assume that we’ll just be of a certain quality anymore. If injury fortune is worse than last year - and it wasn’t particularly great - then worse than 8-4 is possible.

That’s college football in 2026. Indiana may look like Indiana again this year instead of 2008/2009 Bama. Every year is a new story more so than any time in cfb history.
If you got FIFA in your country and your team is in the tournament, no better president to work within the corruption and graft of FIFA than Donald J. Trump.
quote:

Once Pete left, Saban saw the writing on the wall and got out. He knew without Pete, he was cooked.

How many national titles did Saban win after Pete left? Hell, how many title games did he even make?

I rest my case


The problem Saban had was not guys leaving but the fact he'd ran out of rolodex and quality coaches didn't want to hitch their wagon to a coach that may retire midway through their two-year contract.

Pete Golding left and he brought in Kevin Steele who had some undisclosed health issue that led to Saban essentially being the quasi-DC for a good chunk of the season. He needed to replace his DC and a few more coaches, and every interview had the "how long you got" question that he tried to answer as honestly as possible (it's year to year).

I think the feeling that he was not going to be able to land quality coaches did him in as much as players who had just pretty good seasons coming in and asking about comp.
We beat Georgia, Tennessee, LSU, and Auburn in the regular season. We got revenge for our only regular season SEC loss in the first road CFP win ever. The way the season began and end sucked but there is no doubt 2025 was a successful season on the bottom line analysis.

I didn’t like how things looked at times but winning is the goal not beauty pageant scoring.

People who do not think 2025 was a successful season are what I’m talking about when I said “message board poster wheels fall off” types.
Same here. I’m talking about the actual wheels come off not Alabama message board poster wheels coming off (not winning a title).
Small money classes make sense. People don’t like when you consider anything but the “everything coming up tide” angle but it could backfire. That’s all I’ve been saying. Seeing most big recruits with their name attached to ours go the other way then saying “all according to plan” is fine and all but there are parts of the plan that nobody really controls. Of course, I think the backfire hinges on DeBoer putting a bad product on the field. While he’s had some stinkers, he’s basically produced an overall success team each year he’s been a HC. However, injuries are fickle and mean even more in this depthless era. So your team suffers the wrong injuries early enough in the season, it can turn miserable quick, fast, and in a hurry.
I hope so. I think we should definitely figure out how to adjust the offense to get talent on the field at tailback.

Last year we played 3 very Shula-era-esque tailbacks all season but felt that Dear at least had the juice to pop a big run or two per game. Gotta think that difficulty with picking up the offense kept him in 4th position despite being a better pure athlete than the 3 above him.
People probably lost faith in Dear because we were trash ant running it and he couldn’t get on the field. They lose sight of tailback being a position that we may benefit in bringing in transfers more than most offensive skill positions because there is a lot asked of them. We need great zone run vision. We need great pass protection both on straight drops and off their run fake. We need good receiving out of the backfield. Texas swooping in on Smothers was tough because I think we could be limited in 2026 at tailback if there isn’t big progress from the 2nd and 3rd year players.
quote:

I don’t know what this looks like though. There’s nothing we can do from a money raising standpoint that other teams who already are ahead of us aren’t already doing.


I will personally absolutely hate the date an ad is placed on our jersey. But LSU is ready to put a tramp stamp on their garbage arse jerseys if it means Lane has an extra WR to throw to. Teams will be whoring out their stadium names and everything else so we’ll only be keeping up with the Jones’ while giving up the best traditions in the sports.


We have the highest social media following in major college athletics but those followers don’t seemingly have an appetite for helping the team be good in any way.


You're hitting on the big point. At some point, the brand and traditions behind college football is completely eroded away and it just makes more sense to follow the NFL exclusively. The NFL is not an anachronism stuck in an unworkable middle ground, it is a professional sports league fully aware of how to maximize competition in an equitable way that keeps even Jets fans hooked despite all logic saying they should abandon ship. All it takes is a few good picks or a free agency win and you're a contender in the NFL. However nobody can overawe the sport because they're a bigger billionaire than the others.

The University of Alabama has some hard problems to confront if our strategy does not turn out to be the path to consistent contention for championships. Too much of the University's financial stability is dependent on this place being a fun "student life" option. I deleted my post above because I expounded on this more than I care to given the subject area but I do not think it is politically feasible for the University to make an elite academics play if the athletics-based student life story flounders. Sure, we're better academically than we have been previously but I'm talking about making a stab at becoming like UT-Austin or Cal-Berkley...top public higher education institutions in almost every field.
Delete. Don't want to drive down that road on this board.
quote:

Things are simply not as many think and say. Only time will tell if their approach will be successful. Their proven ability as great evaluators of talent is the key. I’m very optimistic and believe it is Alabama’s best, probably only, path to great success in the current environment.


Right, and I am only saying it is as easy to see how this strategy goes wrong as it is to see how it goes as planned.

I think the strategy is a valid one to attempt but it is higher risk strategy than frick you money
quote:

Then we spend the money that was earmarked for those players on the portal.


I think my problem with that logic is that it still ends up being a roster build deficit because:

It is cheaper to retain in most cases than portal and cheaper still to sign out of high school. At least that seems to be the general theme you hear on the matter.

So if we HAVE to spend in the portal we’re probably coming out of the matter net negative in terms of just raw numbers if not overall talent.

Maybe that read on the “what if retention is not what they expect after this season” scenario is not how it will go. However, it feels like it is how it would go given how we’ve spent in the past.
quote:

If it's this terrible next year I'll be panicking with the rest of you, but until that happens I think this class is just the reality of modern recruiting.


I’m of this mindset too. Doesn’t change that we’re playing a game dependent on a lot of ifs and buts with this roster past 2026. I understand the logic but if this season isn’t encouraging to the roster on campus then we may have attrition we weren’t betting on … and what then?
Right, I'm totally on board with small class because underclassman heavy roster. That is sound. However, this class runs the risk of having so many gaps in it that if we have less retention that we anticipate after 2026 then we're in a really fricked roster situation.