- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Boasberg, ordered Trump DOJ provide the court with more info in writing by Noon
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:23 am to cajunangelle
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:23 am to cajunangelle
Or?
0
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:24 am to cajunangelle
Tell him its none of his business. The President invoked a law that was available to him. This wasn't a EO but a law passed by congress to give a President this power. It does not qualify for Judicial Actions.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:24 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
we're in pretty new territory here.
True, someone is actually challenging the leftist SOP of running over any opposition with "the law".
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:24 am to cajunangelle
Yes, how is it that it takes a matter of minutes for a judge to take this action, when people are waiting months and years for almost any other motion/ruling? I doubt he could read it in the time he took to decide on it
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:27 am to cajunangelle
Funny no one said an F'ing word when Biden was flying them all in.
But Trump flies them out and all of a sudden it's a major ordeal.
These sleazy arse democrats will never learn, a landslide election and 29% approval rating be damned.
But Trump flies them out and all of a sudden it's a major ordeal.
These sleazy arse democrats will never learn, a landslide election and 29% approval rating be damned.
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 8:29 am
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:27 am to SlowFlowPro
Under what Jurisdiction does this USDJ have to micromanage the Executive Branch of the federal government?
Did the plane take off from the district in which this particular judge presides?
If not then I don’t see how this Judge has jurisdiction in this matter.
Did the plane take off from the district in which this particular judge presides?
If not then I don’t see how this Judge has jurisdiction in this matter.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:27 am to SlowFlowPro
The judge did exactly as they asked in their filings.
Tell OMB: he must prove he knew he was ordered about affairs of national security-- and he didn't turn around the plane as the ACLU and Democracy Forward demanded, via this crooked Judge.
A sane, nonpartisan judge would have not taken this case and attention whored the national news because OMB.
Get real. Cut the crap.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:29 am to udtiger
I would just put the judge and his daughter in a room with these guys from Tren de Aragua he is so intent on saving and let the judge watch what they do to his daughter. Sharing is caring as the libs say.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I support the Constitution and its limitations on government action and following the rule of law.
I believe that because I’ve followed your posting for a long time and it’s consistent.
But how do we deal with activist left wing judges who are clearly just trying to interfere with the running of the Executive Branch? There have been EOs that were plainly illegal, and I’m fine with the Judiciary ruling against the Administration, but we’ve seen Judges try to interfere with the President’s chosen people (DOGE) reviewing how Treasury is paying for things. We have in front of us now, a case in which the President has decided to revoke a visa from someone he thinks is undesirable. That seems to be a proper function of the Presidency. How do we deal with that, except to fight fire with fire?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:29 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's why the merits are irrelevant
oh yes, We will ignore if the judge actually has the power to issue any of these orders. Since you agree with him that OM is actually Bad, then he should proceed. case closed.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:31 am to SlowFlowPro
[quote]Still waiting for the judge to prove he has standing
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:31 am to cajunangelle
No
He needs to accept the L and move along.
He needs to accept the L and move along.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:31 am to cafeaulait19
quote:
Yes, how is it that it takes a matter of minutes for a judge to take this action, when people are waiting months and years for almost any other motion/ruling? I doubt he could read it in the time he took to decide on it
That seems to be a pattern in these cases. There have been so many that I can't remember, but one was filed in SDNY and ruled on by the judge before he even had time to read the entire 50+ page complaint.
Gee...it's almost as if they see that the suit is against the Trump Administration and they don't have to read, research, or even give the Trump Administration time to respond before ruling against the Trump Administration.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:31 am to cajunangelle
I am sensing a frick you from the DOJ
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:33 am to LSUwag
quote:
Under what Jurisdiction does this USDJ have to micromanage the Executive Branch of the federal government?
Your framing is bad.
The question is about the admin's reliance on certain statutory authorities and whether that is legal and Constitutional, along with the actions committed pursuant to that alleged statutory authority.
This is the role of courts.
quote:
Did the plane take off from the district in which this particular judge presides?
Irrelevant if the admin is acting illegally and outside of its statutory and Constitutional authority.
This is just like Biden's admin getting slapped down for the same reasons for his student loan forgiveness plan under CARES
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:33 am to The Torch
quote:
Funny no one said an F'ing word when Biden was flying them all in.
No shite.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:33 am to cajunangelle
Give the Judge some ‘writing’ and legalisms to chew on while the issue of a single Judge imposing their political beliefs on Presidential power in regard to National Security goes to the Supreme Court and forces the cuck Robert’s to do his job.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:34 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No. You're just acting irrationally. I explained this in the sister thread
No you are the one acting irrationally. In the life of the courts there had been less than 100 nationwide injunctions. During the Trump terms there has been an equal number of nationwide injunctions. Thus you are part of the problem. You fail to have the mental fortitude and intellectual honesty to call frivolous lawsuits what they are. Enjoy being the idiotic fodder for the a system playing you!
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:36 am to Penrod
quote:
But how do we deal with activist left wing judges who are clearly just trying to interfere with the running of the Executive Branch?
You're talking to a lawyer and their paradigm is very different. Most of the thinking nation recognizes that the judiciary emperor has long been naked, but lawyers will be the last to admit it.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:38 am to ABearsFanNMS
quote:Up to 64 injunctions against Trump so far.
No you are the one acting irrationally. In the life of the courts there had been less than 100 nationwide injunctions. During the Trump terms there has been an equal number of nationwide injunctions. Thus you are part of the problem. You fail to have the mental fortitude and intellectual honesty to call frivolous lawsuits what they are. Enjoy being the idiotic fodder for the a system playing you!
It is plainly lawfare.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News