- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Judge Boasberg, ordered Trump DOJ provide the court with more info in writing by Noon
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:40 am to Penrod
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:40 am to Penrod
quote:
But how do we deal with activist left wing judges who are clearly just trying to interfere with the running of the Executive Branch?
That's a question for Congress, who have the authority grant jurisdiction and procedures to district courts.
They can strip all TROs from them or limit the jurisdiction of any such ruling, etc.
The reason why nobody is going to really push for a statutory solution is because the GOP doesn't want to give up this power, either,. especially as the Executive grows to dominate the other 2 branches.
1
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:41 am to DawgCountry
quote:
oh yes, We will ignore if the judge actually has the power to issue any of these orders.
The merits was a reference to the judgment of the "terrorists", which was the focus of OP
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:43 am to ABearsFanNMS
quote:
No you are the one acting irrationally. In the life of the courts there had been less than 100 nationwide injunctions
That is a pivot from my post about the illegals being terrible people.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:55 am to Vood
quote:
This wasn't a EO but a law passed by congress to give a President this power. It does not qualify for Judicial Actions.
That’s blatantly wrong. The President could have misapplied the law, and the law itself could be invalid. I’m not arguing about this specific case, as my sympathies are with the President on this.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 8:59 am to cajunangelle
Better course to bring them back so WE can figure out what to do is what the judge meant.
The judge is trying to become potus.
The judge isnt potus, and therefore cant become potus.
Theres my expert legal review
The judge is trying to become potus.
The judge isnt potus, and therefore cant become potus.
Theres my expert legal review
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:02 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
a question for Congress
I already knew how it was supposed to work. I am asking how do we deal with judges who are acting in bad faith. We can’t rely on Congress, because we don’t have near the votes to impeach due to blatant partisanship. So what now? Are you suggesting that Trump should just throw up his hands and let the next four years go by with his Administration playing by the books while his opponents in Congress and the Judiciary are flouting the rules?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:02 am to cajunangelle
The judge is a St. Albans grad who went to Yale and was in skull and bones. People who never lived in this world will never understand how much of a true club it is and how much the average American is on the outside. They have lived in the ultimate bubble their entire lives and their entire lives are also an academic exercise. They don’t feel the same pain your average person does whether it be financially or socially- their high school was 80k a year. Their classmates are US and foreign diplomats kids. They are failures if they don’t go ivy. Hell if they fail in life it’s always failing up.
DC and the east coast in general is a massive club and they scratch each others backs. Always have, always will. A republican judge with the same pedigree would have made the exact same ruling
DC and the east coast in general is a massive club and they scratch each others backs. Always have, always will. A republican judge with the same pedigree would have made the exact same ruling
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:03 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Still waiting for the judge to prove he has standing!
The judge or parties?
The sarcasm wasn't thick enough for you?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:03 am to DawgCountry
And don't forget grooming.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:04 am to Penrod
quote:
Are you suggesting that Trump should just throw up his hands and let the next four years go by
That's not what the people voted for.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:05 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Judge Boasberg, in response, ordered the Justice Department to provide the court with more information in writing by Tuesday at noon.
Trump should release a video and say "No."
Given the affiliations this judge has, Kash and Bondi should have already tapped his wires.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:05 am to dakarx
quote:
Still waiting for the judge to prove he has standing
Yep
Just ignore this sperm stain. He lost. It's over.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:08 am to Penrod
I think Mike Davis, along with others has addressed this shite, congress has a lot of power here, we gettin ready to see what they made of, if something is not done things are gonna really get ugly for some people
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:09 am to SlowFlowPro
Please show where the Executive is acting illegally....and show your work.
You are a fricking autistic retard.
You are a fricking autistic retard.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:09 am to dakarx
Amazing that time and again no one had standing back in 2016 while an election was likely being stolen.
But now the Left instantly gets anything they want.
But now the Left instantly gets anything they want.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:11 am to LSUwag
quote:
Under what Jurisdiction does this USDJ have to micromanage the Executive Branch of the federal government?
Did the plane take off from the district in which this particular judge presides?
If not then I don’t see how this Judge has jurisdiction in this matter.
This has been a constant with most, of not all, of the other frickery by Marxist Dem judges blocking Trump's actions.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:11 am to cajunangelle
quote:Look, this a wasted effort with you, but ...
Can ... anyone ... Please provide in writing how is it that the "ACLU "----or "Democracy Forward," was elected to run foreign and or domestic policy via a corrupt DC Judge?
The Executive Branch indisputably has the Constitutional authority to "run domestic or foreign policy," but the Judicial Branch indisputably has the Constitutional authority to determine whether the Executive is exercising that authority in a manner consistent with the law.
If some future President Dem were to decide that it is good "domestic policy" to euthanize all GOP primary voters, I suspect that you would (rightly) demand for the Judiciary to intervene.
Here, Trump is arguably violating the law in a half dozen ways. Our system provides for review of those action AND for a temporary "hold" to allow that review.
If it were YOUR ox being gored, you would agree.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:12 am to cajunangelle
quote:
ordered ....by noon
or what cvnt ?
that's right, not a damn thing
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 9:13 am
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:13 am to AggieHank86
Your mom's brother is your father, isn't he?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 9:15 am to cajunangelle
quote:A TRO is typically supported by affidavit evidence, and that evidence is taken as true until it can be challenged at the subsequent hearing on a preliminary injunction.
I want to know if Judge Boasberg automatically signed off on whatever the ACLU and Democracy Forward requested in their filing without question?
So, the judge might question the applicability of any evidence provided in support of a TRO, but (generally) not its veracity. But woe be upon the lawyer who knowingly presents false evidence in support of a TRO.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News