Favorite team:LSU 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:9525
Registered on:3/1/2020
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

All relying on the tard nyt analysis that ivory fell for.



The NYT didn't say anything THIS stupid:)

They just showed that the agent wasn't in the path of the vehicle when he fired the three shots.

quote:

THEY WANTED THIS TO HAPPEN. How many times do you have to see this movie?

Please wake up if you have an ounce of objectivity left inside yourself.


Lol. I don't know why you're painting me this way. I have long known about Minnesota's Dem corruption from friends who live there.

I have pushed The Fall of Minneapolis on here for years. It was made by the same Liz Collin from Alpha News...the same outfit that published the agent's cellphone video:

quote:

Its ok. Seethe alittle more


What am I seething about?

I think it's a justified shooting. Based on the bogus Chauvin prosecution, however, I think the agent could have trouble in a Minnesota prosecution of him.
quote:

Minnesota has no jurisdiction.



What??? Of course Minnesota has jurisdiction over a homicide that occurred in Minnesota.

The ICE agent will assert limited federal authority which, if successful, will get the case moved to federal court to be tried under Minnesota law.

As a practical matter, the Trump Administration has made that unlikely. They have barred Minnesota from being part of the DOJ investigation. Smart.

"The state's Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, which was initially tapped to conduct a joint investigation with the FBI, released a statement on Thursday stating that the agency had been kicked off the search in favor of allowing the federal government to conduct the operation on its own."
quote:

JimEverett
Ivorybullshitartists says no way.


Jbird, I haven't known you to lie so much. I have only said that ICE agents cannot arrest American citizens for STATE offenses.

I respect Jim. If he thinks I'm reading the statute wrong, I am all ears.
ICE is empowered to arrest anyone (including citizens) relating to FEDERAL offenses. ICE has ZERO power regarding state offenses, correct?

Did I miss something, Jim?
quote:

Here's something you can learn. Don't allow the narration from a liar nytimes retard of a video (that illuminates the exact opposite of the retards narration ) impact your perspective.


I wasn't in the least influenced by the NYT commentary. I just thought (like cellphone video from AlphaNews) that it added many details.

Here's how I introduced the video:

Most of us agree that:
- the Dems are responsible for the illegal alien crisis
- the surge of ICE is Trump fulfilling the mandate given to him by the American people
-Renee Good was in the wrong: she was obstructing federal agents in the performance of their official duties; she disobeyed a lawful command to exit her vehicle; and, she unlawfully attempted to flee with her vehicle initially pointed at the ICE agent who shot her
-Good, and only Good (maybe with an assist from propagandists), was responsible for her own death
-Good's shameful and dangerous lack of respect for the law and for law enforcement was encouraged by the Left's hateful lies
-the ICE agent who shot her was justified because he reasonably feared for his life
quote:

if it was a Minnesota Police officer that was doing the same thing and she did that, was it still not justified?


That's the whole point. The shooting WAS justified under rational thinking, but unless the shooting officer is entitled to federal immunity, he could be subjected to the Minnesota system. Do you think Derek Chauvin got a fair trial?
quote:

This persona is done. Log out in ignominy. Start a new one


I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. It's a simple question: can an ICE agent arrest an American citizen for a state offense?

quote:

Narrator: beating a hasty retreat from his most recently indefensible position, The chimpanzee takes a position in a new tree from which he can continue to fling his bodily fluids.


I don't see the PoliBoard as a battle. I'm not here to establish a position and defend it at all costs.

I'm just interested in learning. I appreciate everyone who helps me with that...particularly if I didn't have the right information or my thinking was flawed.

You have helped me understand some things better. Thanks.




quote:

I do not think she 'tried to run him over' at all.

BUT she didn't care if she hit him either - she was just trying evade arrest, which is a crime itself.


After watching it over and over, I think that's the best conclusion. Sorry for being contrarian. I was grumpy because we were told initially that Good had attacked multiple agents by trying to ram them while they were digging a vehicle out of the snow.

As I have said over and over, I thought it was a justified shooting because the agent reasonably feared for his life.

The pesky questions about whether the order to get out of the car was lawful related to the issue of whether the agent would succeed in evading Minnesota prosecution. When trying to detain Good, was the shooting agent involved in one of his duties as a federal officer?



quote:

So you're acknowledging her behavior warranted law enforcement involvement of some kind?


Absolutely.
quote:

Arguing a federal agent didn’t have the power to detain her is idiotic. You are idiotic.


Why is everything so personal? I'm not idiotic.

You know ICE agents can't detain an American citizen for a state traffic offense, for instance, correct?
quote:

Who knows exactly what happened before the footage we’ve seen, but here’s my guess based on the situation:


You are probably right on all accounts.
quote:

So its perfectly fine to be parked perpendicular in the road as long as you arent literally blocking the entire road?


So contact someone with the authority to enforce traffic laws and get them to write her a ticket. The question is does her conduct rise to the level of a violation of 18 USC 111?

quote:

In your opinion, based on what you’ve seen, were these ladies interfering with or attempting to interfere with these agents doing their job?


Based on what I have SEEN, I don't think that the women were interfering with the ICE agents in performance of their lawful duties.

All I have seen is them be obnoxious bitches to agents who were just trying to do their job. What mission were the agents on? Were they prevented from executing a warrant?

From what I see in the video, Good isn't blocking the road. People are passing without any difficulty.

APPARENTLY, Good had been harassing the agents for a while. Surely there is video of that.

quote:

That's not what you were saying at the beginning of the thread...."what does this cell phone footage prove?"....I believe was the quote, no.
And then you proceeded to get your shite pushed in by the ones that see through your ruse.



What's the ruse? I thought the big question was "did Good hit the agent who shall not be named?" This doesn't answer that.

It DOES answer things I hadn't considered...eye contact, lack of fear.
What's to retreat from? Y'all act like curiosity is the biggest sin.

If I know something, I will say it. I knew the Comey case would be dismissed. That didn't mean I wanted it to be so.

Contrary to what some to think, there are limits to what laws ICE agents can enforce against American citizens. I'm not sure "get out of the fricking car" is a lawful order.
quote:

Dude, just stop.

You were wrong here. Admit it.


There was nothing to be right or wrong about. I asked what did the cellphone video prove. Thanks, I see what it proved.

I'm still not sure the "get out of the fricking car" was a legal order to an American citizen made by an ICE agent.
quote:

Your schtick has been played out.


I don't have a schtick other than to get more information.

There were good answers as to what the cellphone video proved. It destroyed the possibility that Good just panicked and didn't see the agent who shall not be named.
quote:

A number of things, the now deceased was actually calm didn't appear scared, was 100% aware of the office she hit, and knew she would or could in fact hit the officer once moving forward and did it anyway.

also- the accomplice (wife) is complicit in this, was an aggressor in this, and should be held accountable in some capacity.

That's to name a few


Thanks. Those are all good points. I was focused on whether or not the video was supposed to show that the agent who shall not be named was hit or not.