IvoryBillMatt

Nice to have Nuremberg as the photo. Looking forward to the Military Tribunals for all who participated in mass scale medical experimentation on everyone who was denied informed consent.

Let's start with the architects of Operation Warpspeed!

Outstanding!

quote:

---

So that is that.

---

I wouldn't say a lawyer's denial establishes anything. With all the doubt about what really happened, I think Kerkhoff could be BOTH the person in the videos AND someone who did not place any pipe bombs on January 5.

The Post article was behind a pay wall. I'm not sure what specifically the lawyer is denying.

quote:

---

quote:
-10.5

Is that the points LSU will score?

---

If so, I would take the under.

quote:

---

Do you have the video of that happening? (You don’t)

The reality is that these low-lives overwhelmingly occupy the left end of the political spectrum.

---

That's a fair point. I was just trying to test whether or not people believe in the protection of speech based on whether or not they agree with the political view expressed in that speech.

quote:

---

I would.

If can't pull my dick out in public, how can someone else don a full inflatable dick costume and prince around in public.

There's essentially an infinite amount of ways she can still protest Trump being a 'dictator'. Just not like that.

---

Did you think the costume was a realistic depiction of a penis? I think it would be a closer case if she had a sign of actual dick pics that said "Don't be a dick-tator."

A cartoon costume, however, with a political protest sign is almost certainly not going to withstand a first amendment defense in the unlikely event that this prosecution proceeds. They will probably drop the prosecution if she waives bringing any civil action.

quote:

---

Tell that to the Bozos in Minnesota who have criminalized the dreaded N Word.....the liberals dream. We've now had an arrest for it.

---

That's the whole point. Speech shouldn't be criminalized, because it allows authorities to decide what is politically correct or not.

quote:

---

frick your kids. It’s called the first amendment.

---

It would be a teachable moment. "Yes, that's offensive, but the founding fathers were smart enough to protect freedom of speech...even offensive speech. Otherwise, political opponents could imprison people for expressions they didn't like. It wouldn't be right to imprison President Trump for saying 'frick' to reporters or having a picture of him dumping shite on liberal protestors, would it? Just thank the Good Lord you were born here and not in the UK or Australia where woke authorities prosecute people for speech that goes against the woke agenda."

quote:

---

I don’t want to see any congressional hearings and testimony. No more letters from Jim Jordan and other Congress members.

I want the FBI to arrest and DOJ to prosecute. Am I wrong? Am I asking for too much?

---

I agree with the futility of Congress DOING anything, but, in terms of seeing the truth, the testimony helps. For instance, seeing Fauci evade and lie in responding to Rand Paul's questions convinced me that Fauci was guilty of lying to the American people about Covid-19 and the response to it.

Will he ever be prosecuted? No, but his testimony resolved that he should be.