- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
IvoryBillMatt
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 10261 |
| Registered on: | 3/1/2020 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: New trump statement on Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Greene, and Massie
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/21/26 at 10:52 pm to RobbBobb
quote:
He ran Tucker out of mainstream media
How did Trump run Tucker out of mainstream media?
It was Tucker's repeating of Trump's belief that the Dominion voting machines were rigged that got Tucker fired from Fox.
1
re: New trump statement on Tucker Carlson, Marjorie Greene, and Massie
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/21/26 at 10:48 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Tucker has ALWAYS been a loser??? Why did President Trump welcome him to campaign for him.
re: Trump says USS Lincoln’s Extended Deployment “Not Nearly Long Enough”
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/21/26 at 8:50 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Those problems, of course, having been fixed for JFK and beyond.
Much obliged. Thanks for sharing your knowledge.
re: Trump says USS Lincoln’s Extended Deployment “Not Nearly Long Enough”
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/21/26 at 7:10 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
I’m not wrong here. Trump is. But he also doesn’t know anything about it and just says things he hears from random people. He is wrong, the navy thinks he’s wrong, the builders think he’s wrong, Congress thinks he’s wrong.
There is no benefit to steam over EMALS. Not with our ships power systems and configurations. None at all.
Imagine resetting designs for a ship that’s about to be built, and compounding construction delays by years because you want to go back to old technology for no demonstrable reason
This was a real head scratcher. I waited for a few days for some rationale to be cited...but none came forward.
What's your guess for the reason? Even if someone DID get in Trump’s ear, I still can't imagine a justification.
re: Trump Targets American Bar Association Accreditation Power
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/21/26 at 3:37 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
It’s about fricking time.
The ABA is stacked with far left radicals.
Amen. This is genuis and welcome.
I wonder whose idea it was.
Handwriting was on the wall when in 1990 the ABA endorsed Roe v Wade, which was an abomination morally, Constitutionally, and legally.
re: SEC Football Ranked by Percentage of In-State Roster
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/21/26 at 3:29 pm to Porter Osborne Jr
quote:
I would have thought that LSU would be higher
Same. That has to be our lowest % ever.
re: SEC Football Ranked by Percentage of In-State Roster
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/21/26 at 2:43 pm to BevoBucks
Same. Prolly NIL.
SEC Football Ranked by Percentage of In-State Roster
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/21/26 at 2:40 pm
UGA 59.7
Tex 57.1
UF 53
A&M 51.2
LSU 37.5
USC. 36.4
Ala 36
Auburn 34.2
State 33.3
Tenn 29.8
Mizzou 27.4
Plantation Lady 26.5
Pigs 23.7
Oklahoma 20
Vandy 17.4
UK 12.7
Tex 57.1
UF 53
A&M 51.2
LSU 37.5
USC. 36.4
Ala 36
Auburn 34.2
State 33.3
Tenn 29.8
Mizzou 27.4
Plantation Lady 26.5
Pigs 23.7
Oklahoma 20
Vandy 17.4
UK 12.7
SEC Football Ranked by Percentage of In-State Roster
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/21/26 at 2:36 pm
Without scrolling to the ranking at bottom, guess:
-top 5
-how many over 50%
UGA 59.7
Tex 57.1
UF 53
A&M 51.2
LSU 37.5
USC. 36.4
Ala 36
Auburn 34.2
State 33.3
Tenn 29.8
Mizzou 27.4
Plantation Lady 26.5
Pigs 23.7
Oklahoma 20
Vandy 17.4
UK 12.7
-top 5
-how many over 50%
UGA 59.7
Tex 57.1
UF 53
A&M 51.2
LSU 37.5
USC. 36.4
Ala 36
Auburn 34.2
State 33.3
Tenn 29.8
Mizzou 27.4
Plantation Lady 26.5
Pigs 23.7
Oklahoma 20
Vandy 17.4
UK 12.7
re: Nordone or Norman for Senate in SC?
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/21/26 at 9:11 am to RobertFootball
quote:
Norman hurt himself by endorsing Tricky Nikki in 2024. That was a beyond stupid move on his part.
Thanks. Didn't know that. Makes more sense now.
The more I hear from Nordone, the more I root for Norman.
re: Nordone or Norman for Senate in SC?
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/21/26 at 8:43 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Problem is open primaries.
Thanks. Didn't realize that.
re: Nordone or Norman for Senate in SC?
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/21/26 at 8:38 am to SallysHuman
quote:
Ain’t nobody but democrats voting for Nordone.
What do you see on the ground in SC? Does Norman have a chance?
re: Nordone or Norman for Senate in SC?
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/21/26 at 8:35 am to PorkSammich
Is that good or bad?
I doubt Norman would be any less supportive of Trump. After Trump's gone, what is the value of Nordone? I would say the same thing for Letlow here in Louisiana.
I doubt Norman would be any less supportive of Trump. After Trump's gone, what is the value of Nordone? I would say the same thing for Letlow here in Louisiana.
Nordone or Norman for Senate in SC?
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/21/26 at 8:30 am
I'm against Birthright Senators. Who do you want to win?
re: Pro-Vax Posts from Random 20-21 Threads on Topic
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/21/26 at 6:32 am to John somers
Pureblood and untested checking in.
re: DOJ argues Comey novel shows he knew ‘86 47’ post was a threat against Trump
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/21/26 at 6:19 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Ivory acts nonbiased but he isnt.
Your drive by slurs of me without any proof are annoying. If you have any proof of that, please bring it or quit making shite up about me.
As for legal cases, I just lay out the law and the facts and make comments based on that. Feel free to point out anytime I have been wrong.
I guess you are trying to say I'm biased against the Trump Administration. If so, why would I start this thread about how the prosecution of the Milwaukee judge who obstructed ICE looked like it would be successful?
re: DOJ argues Comey novel shows he knew ‘86 47’ post was a threat against Trump
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/20/26 at 10:52 pm to davyjones
quote:
This is obviously your ultimate conclusion and the basis upon which you build your entire argument. But I see a bit of a flaw that may well call the entire argument into serious question. My retort would be this: just as a general matter, how exactly does one produce an “objectively true” conclusion about the outcome of an event that hasn’t occurred yet?
Semantically, you have a good point. I was using "objectively" as a shortened version of "without prejudice towards what we want to happen." My conclusion is just a prediction with a 99.999999% chance of being true.
With the doomed previous prosecution of Comey for perjury, I was accused of having TDS for simply pointing out that it was a slam dunk to dismiss the case because the prosecutor was not legally qualified for her position.
Given the law and facts in the 8647 prosecution, there isn't any theory of the case that is going to yield an ultimate conviction....outside an admission by Comey.
re: DOJ argues Comey novel shows he knew ‘86 47’ post was a threat against Trump
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/20/26 at 10:17 pm to OU81TOO
quote:
Poster treating every thread as a court case.
Lol. We're literally talking about a court case.
re: DOJ argues Comey novel shows he knew ‘86 47’ post was a threat against Trump
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/20/26 at 10:14 pm to moneyg
quote:
Well, that's just dishonest.
Your entire post continuously mixes objective truth with what can be proven. I don't know if it's intentional or unintentional. But, as I've said, I've seen this among attorneys a lot.
What was dishonest? None of us knows what Comey actually intended. He's not going to confess that "8647" was a threat against the President.
Therefore, the prosecution is going to have to prove Comey’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. I have laid out how, objectively, they will not be able to do that.
re: DOJ argues Comey novel shows he knew ‘86 47’ post was a threat against Trump
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/20/26 at 6:46 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
quote:
The rotten motherfrickers know exactly what they have called for & to sit up here & defend it & make excuses is despicable
Who is making excuses? I'm just telling you why Comey won't be convicted.
The first two assassination attempts on Trump happened before Comey’s post. Are you claiming he incited them?
Why the plural? Is some other motherfricker other than Comey on trial?
re: Engineer warned Trump admin of peeling pool liner a month before vandalism charges
Posted by IvoryBillMatt on 8/20/26 at 4:30 pm to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
You don't rip off pieces.
That's the entire point. The Trump DOJ dismissed all of the known cases of vandalism for lack of proof that any of the defendants caused damage to the pool.
Popular
15
