- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is there even a definition of "conservative" anymore? When did you start promoting it?
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:16 pm to TideCPA
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:16 pm to TideCPA
quote:
This is going to get downvoted to hell, but for 95%+ of people who consider themselves "conservative", the best way to define their political beliefs is "measured opposition to Democrats".
Totally wrong (and I did not down vote). What you're talking about is the 'my team' group. In the real world no more than half of conservatives are team rather than true ideology. But on this board it's more like 10% are team. There is much more serious philosophy on this board than at Wal-Mart.
And Democrats are MUCH more team than philosophy. It goes all the way back to 'GOP is for the rich man and Dems are for the working man.' Hell, that's what Biden is pushing right now just like it was 100 years ago. Dems do not think. They feel.
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:It's a tough balance to achieve long term (and I think entropy is inevitable), but it's basic social contract theory. Ideally it's a social contract that results from a relatively homogenous, like-minded people with a shared morality. With the understanding that certain freedoms must be forfeited to achieve social order. That, in my opinion, is not tyranny.
so the argument is to use tyranny to ensure there isn't enough freedom (or to enforce morality) to avoid tyranny?
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
GWB
The guy who nearly doubled the national debt? THAT'S conservatism, and you're whining about "trumpkins"?
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:23 pm to Flats
quote:Some are, but not "liberalism" or "conservativism". Those labels have been hijacked as general labels for Republicans and Democrats, and unfortunately no longer reference a coherent set of policy ideals.
Is liberalism? Is any political label?
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:23 pm to SlowFlowPro
So me not caring if two men suck each other off behind closed doors makes me not a conservative?
Any stupid political spectrum test I take says im a rt leaning libertarian. I am more conservative in my day to day life, but honestly think things like the war on Drugs has been a complete disaster and I dont care if dudes want to get married. That is so far down on the list of shite I care about and dont see why Republicans should either.
Any stupid political spectrum test I take says im a rt leaning libertarian. I am more conservative in my day to day life, but honestly think things like the war on Drugs has been a complete disaster and I dont care if dudes want to get married. That is so far down on the list of shite I care about and dont see why Republicans should either.
This post was edited on 5/12/21 at 1:29 pm
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:24 pm to TideCPA
quote:
Some are, but not "liberalism" or "conservativism". Those labels have been hijacked as general labels for Republicans and Democrats, and unfortunately no longer reference a coherent set of policy ideals.
One could argue, "liberalism" even more so.
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
"Trump didn't fully run on deregulation."
I don't think you're giving Trump enough credit here and I don't even like Trump. He ran on and did deregulate in at least the areas of environmental and labor regs, and there could be more. these are just the areas I am most aware. Trump is not what I would call a "free-trader," but I would not lump that into the arena of "regulation."
I don't think you're giving Trump enough credit here and I don't even like Trump. He ran on and did deregulate in at least the areas of environmental and labor regs, and there could be more. these are just the areas I am most aware. Trump is not what I would call a "free-trader," but I would not lump that into the arena of "regulation."
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:31 pm to Zach
quote:Look, I hear you about Democrats. They scapegoat "the rich" because that is a convenient bogeyman for both their progressive wing, which truly hates the rich, and the neoliberal wing, which is actually comprised of the rich but pretends to hate the rich to secure working class and minority votes.
Totally wrong (and I did not down vote). What you're talking about is the 'my team' group. In the real world no more than half of conservatives are team rather than true ideology. But on this board it's more like 10% are team. There is much more serious philosophy on this board than at Wal-Mart.
And Democrats are MUCH more team than philosophy. It goes all the way back to 'GOP is for the rich man and Dems are for the working man.' Hell, that's what Biden is pushing right now just like it was 100 years ago. Dems do not think. They feel.
My issue with your assertion that conservatives are more about ideology than team lies with the examples I've already laid out. Conservatives LOVED the CIA, FBI, and military-industrial complex during the Bush years because they controlled them all. Now conservatives (especially on this board) viscerally hate the former two because they're being weaponized by neoliberals (and increasingly progressives). The recent shift toward classical liberal ideas by "conservatives" is one of convenience, not ideology.
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
I'm late to this party, but I was thinking the other day that's it's interesting how the Trump brigade made themselves true conservatives and rebranded neocons as RINOs.
Trump brought me to the party with the anti-war, closed border stuff, and I liked that he was throwing a bone to the working man/unions and kind of liberal on social issues. All I know is I don't want neocons. I love Ron and Rand Paul, whatever their brand is. But, that is probably unelectable when it comes to president.
Trump brought me to the party with the anti-war, closed border stuff, and I liked that he was throwing a bone to the working man/unions and kind of liberal on social issues. All I know is I don't want neocons. I love Ron and Rand Paul, whatever their brand is. But, that is probably unelectable when it comes to president.
This post was edited on 5/12/21 at 1:34 pm
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:34 pm to dgnx6
quote:
I am more conservative in my day to day life, but honestly think things like the war on Drugs has been a complete disaster and I dont care if dudes want to get married.
There is nothing conservative about 5 people defining marriage for the entire United States. You can be pro gay marriage (I'm not, FWIW) and still recognize that, just like Roe, it was judicial tyranny. If you recognize that but don't care because you agree with the decision, then I question how conservative you are in any aspect.
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:34 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:Probably yes, because it's used incorrectly by progressives to mask their own ideology and used incorrectly by Republicans to smear Democrats.
One could argue, "liberalism" even more so.
The founders were liberals. True liberals. Hell, look at the first paragraph of Wiki's entry for liberalism (note that there's nothing in there about giant surveillance states, social "equity", overregulation, etc.):
quote:
Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty, consent of the governed and equality before the law.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support free markets, free trade, limited government, individual rights (including civil rights and human rights), capitalism, democracy, secularism, gender equality, racial equality, internationalism, freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of religion.
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I'm 38, so for most of my life, it's been guys like Trent Lott, Newt Gingrich, GWB, Boehner, etc.
Holy shite how did I miss this.
GWB?????????
Son of daddy "New World Order"?
Globalism is NOT conservatism.
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:35 pm to 93and99
quote:
Globalism is NOT conservatism
Whats your definition of globalism?
Tarrifs aren't conservative. They are a traditional leftist tool.
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:38 pm to TideCPA
quote:
My issue with your assertion that conservatives are more about ideology than team lies with the examples I've already laid out. Conservatives LOVED the CIA, FBI, and military-industrial complex during the Bush years because they controlled them all. Now conservatives (especially on this board) viscerally hate the former two because they're being weaponized by neoliberals (and increasingly progressives). The recent shift toward classical liberal ideas by "conservatives" is one of convenience, not ideology.
not true conservatives. I frickign hated them then and hate them now. Only now im considered a constitutional libertarian on the political scale because idiots have moved what conservativism is.
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
Good luck. There are a few Trump fans who have tried to stitch together a philosophy out of the gossamer threads of Trump's tweets, but it's a fool's errand.
Trump pushed "fair" trade and secure borders and actually implemented a pretty strong tax reform. But that isn't what he is about.
Trump was about punching leftist media and politicians in the nose and not letting up. And that resounded with a lot of people who are tired of coastal, leftist, academic elites telling them they are racist, sexist, terrible people and dragging down the country into a garbage pit of cultural marxism.
But that isn't a philosophy, that's a gut reaction. It doesn't tell you how to govern, it tells you what to attack.
The Trump ideology, such as it is, is to attack your enemies.
And attack your allies who might be enemies the most.
It is powerful, but ultimately self-defeating without some core principles to guide it.
As for my definition, LSUpimp described it better than I would. Libertarianism but with a need to protect and preserve key traditional non government institutions like family, religion, and patriotism.
Trump pushed "fair" trade and secure borders and actually implemented a pretty strong tax reform. But that isn't what he is about.
Trump was about punching leftist media and politicians in the nose and not letting up. And that resounded with a lot of people who are tired of coastal, leftist, academic elites telling them they are racist, sexist, terrible people and dragging down the country into a garbage pit of cultural marxism.
But that isn't a philosophy, that's a gut reaction. It doesn't tell you how to govern, it tells you what to attack.
The Trump ideology, such as it is, is to attack your enemies.
And attack your allies who might be enemies the most.
It is powerful, but ultimately self-defeating without some core principles to guide it.
As for my definition, LSUpimp described it better than I would. Libertarianism but with a need to protect and preserve key traditional non government institutions like family, religion, and patriotism.
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
At this point I feel like you’re either prog filth or anti-prog filth.
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:44 pm to lsu777
quote:You're using the No True Scotsman fallacy. Damn near 100% of politicians who ran as "conservatives" in 2000 voted for the PATRIOT Act and the wild expansion of the surveillance state. The issue with conservatism is that it is, by definition, relative. A conservative in 1776 favored traditional values and institutions, which at the time were represented by the British empire. A conservative in 1940 favored non-interventionism and a small military, since both of those were well-established traditional features of American politics. A conservative in 2000 favored an enormous military and a huge government, since those were traditional features of government for half a century.
not true conservatives. I frickign hated them then and hate them now. Only now im considered a constitutional libertarian on the political scale because idiots have moved what conservativism is.
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:44 pm to dgnx6
quote:
So me not caring if two men suck each other off behind closed doors makes me not a conservative?
Any stupid political spectrum test I take says im a rt leaning libertarian. I am more conservative in my day to day life, but honestly think things like the war on Drugs has been a complete disaster and I dont care if dudes want to get married. That is so far down on the list of shite I care about and dont see why Republicans should either.
personally i believe it was frickign stupid to allow government to get involved in marriage to begin with. Should have been strictly civil unions in the eyes of the government and marriage as a religious item only.
once we allowed the government to open that door it was only a matter of time before it kept expanding just like its matter of time before they start forcing churches to marry anyone and everyone or lose tax status.
but i completely agree with you, who gives a frick or why should they give a frick. now we allowed them in and there is no closing the door.
all forms of prohibition have been a disaster and more harm than good for sure and nothing outside of possibly the patriot act has eroded freedoms more than the war on drugs. nothing.
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:48 pm to TideCPA
well i would define a conservative as your classic definition of liberalism
but also someone that promotes the nuclear family and traditional american ideas from the 50-80s.
items mandated in the constitution like national defense should be strong, very fricking strong, but limited in oversees actions to items congress approves and only if war is declared.
quote:
Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty, consent of the governed and equality before the law.[1][2][3] Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support free markets, free trade, limited government, individual rights (including civil rights and human rights), capitalism, democracy, secularism, gender equality, racial equality, internationalism, freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of religion.
but also someone that promotes the nuclear family and traditional american ideas from the 50-80s.
items mandated in the constitution like national defense should be strong, very fricking strong, but limited in oversees actions to items congress approves and only if war is declared.
Posted on 5/12/21 at 1:51 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Whats your definition of globalism?
Tarrifs aren't conservative. They are a traditional leftist tool.
Globalism is leftist too.
Popular
Back to top



1








