Favorite team:New Orleans Pelicans 
Location:New Orleans
Biography:Native of Sulphur, SHS class of ''88, LSU, class of ''92, law school at William & Mary, class of ''95. Live in N.O. now
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:7991
Registered on:8/13/2004
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
“You've paid premium price for steak at chili's.”

The cold hard truth. You didn’t get your Mr John’s (or insert favorite steakhouse here) and now instead of Popeye’s you gotta go to Church’s for your chicken. It’s a crying shame.
I am all for experimenting with lineups. There is some talent and even depth on this flawed team so it’s even more important to find the right mix.
The problem is that we have missed on so many players that AK and Jordan are still viable options for this team with the roster it currently has. Indeed, AK was good as recently as 2024 and Jordan was a double digit sack guy just last year. Two outgoing Saints greats--neither will be here next year--are not the problem in my opinion.
The sad thing is that we an OL stacked with high picks and don’t have a good unit.
We have had some Will Clapp and similar level of "successes" in the lower rounds--I am blanking on some of the others--but this it is damning that we have not had a starter come from the lower rounds in a long time. OL is a position where that can occur with some frequency. Using high picks on OL does make it less likely that lower picks will rise to starter level. Maybe Ruiz's replacement (Wright?) will be next.
“Are we at the point where we have to start over? Is some McCoy health luck + getting a legit RT and moving Fuaga all we need?”

This is probably the most interesting part of an interesting question. “Starting over” would prove really hard to do, especially anytime soon, and would require pouring more resources into this position group to the exclusion of needs elsewhere. (This is what’s so frustrating about the OL—we have invested heavily but returns have been small.). So, I think you’re right about keeping your best pieces and hoping they get healthier/better while seeing what you can get for some of the others and then backfilling with mid round picks and solid but attainable veterans. It’s hard to imagine it would produce a worse OL than we have now and would allow the Saints to draft high where there are glaring needs on defense or (I still believe) at playmaking positions on offense).
“I do think the offense could end up being good before the season is up...but I just can't imagine us hanging in there long enough for it to matter.”

I am hoping for a faster turnaround, but I fear the timelines on the key injuries could have us “too late” by the time things click.
“It seemed like every single drop back in the game he had very little time before he was getting hit.”

The pressure looked withering to me. When given a little time, I saw first rate throws. The one on fourth down was a dart.
I had a good discussion with a friend who watched on TV, while I was at the game, and we had very different assessments of how Shough played. I thought he played well or even very well under some incredibly difficult circumstances. My friend said that on TV Shough looked like he did not know where to go with the ball and just otherwise looked bad with both accuracy and decision making.

So, what did you make of Shough's play and how did you watch the game?
This is the most disappointing position group on the team. All these high picks and “mediocre” seems to be the unit’s high water mark, with plenty of scary bad thrown in there. I wish I knew what to do, but I hope they try to do it through trades, FA signings, and low round picks. If we are going to have a mediocre OL, let’s do it for cheaper.
As bad as last night was, I think it was far more a product of having too many players out in the front 7, which was a terrible matchup for the B Robs. I was afraid going in that there would be no run D and it was even worse than I thought.

The offensive struggles are also injury related, but Moore has to try something else at LT.
I think you’re onto something. This can’t stand. There is no way to be successful without better OL play.

re: Falcons fans in the city

Posted by N.O. via West-Cal on 10/5/26 at 4:34 pm to
It was good seeing a number of Falcons fans at lunch today in the CBD. It's a great, "real" rivalry.
"s the 20 year anniversary of the reopening of the dome that big a thing?

I understand the devastation of the storm and that it was a big deal then. It feels a bit media driven to me. But that’s why I’m asking."

Like all commemorations, this is one is about remembering something that was special and mattered intensely to a lot of people, almost all of whom had been through a lot and some of whom had been through a hell of a lot. But no, this is nothing like 20 years ago.
I sure did and will be in the same seats tonight. It was a wild scene downtown pretty much through the entire day. I was at work but we were only about three blocks away so you could not miss the feel of it. I can’t remember what we did pregame, but I remember getting in the Dome early. The place was already buzzing and then Gleason and then DeLoach, which remains the greatest single moment I have ever experienced at a live sporting event.
I am pleased to see the Supreme Court reining in the ceding of constitutional powers, especially the end of Chevron deference. It was just far too expansive.

Ultimately, I don’t see how this statute ceded the executive’s power to fire. It provided a method for interim assignments—no problem there—but did not (to my recollection) address termination.

re: MNF: Roll Call - LFG

Posted by N.O. via West-Cal on 10/4/26 at 10:52 pm to
Allegro’s is no more. Alas …

I will be in the seats we were in twenty years ago. Kinda hard to believe.
“The Judiciary and Legislature cannot force the Executive to hire, retain amd compensate a US Attorney.”

I think that’s ultimately where the decision comes down. The executive can’t force the Senate to approve his appointments, but the president lose his power to fire a US attorney just because he’s an interim. Yes, it’s a mess and yes, it’s bad government, but I think it’s the right decision.
“Tell me how that statute is not in violation of the Separation of Powers.”

I can see this point of view, but what about the Senate’s power to approve the presidential nominees? This is going to be very interesting, and I’m not sure where I come down on this one.
Some friends and I were counting qbs we would take over Shough, and Burrow is one of only a few I would take, and there are decent arguments for not taking him. Mahomes, Allen, and Burrow were the only three for me. I was close on Lamar, mainly bc of the playoffs and Lamar could be an old 29 bc of how he is at his best when he gets outside the pocket. I’m bullish on Shough!