Favorite team:New Orleans Pelicans 
Location:New Orleans
Biography:Native of Sulphur, SHS class of ''88, LSU, class of ''92, law school at William & Mary, class of ''95. Live in N.O. now
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:7887
Registered on:8/13/2004
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Have you ever had to explain the rainbows everywhere this month to a child?

No, I never did with either kid. I am not trying to make a point in saying that; I just find it interesting that I never did and it wasn’t for lack of pride flags in this town.
Gotcha. I didn’t think it could be done without New Orleans being safe blue, but I trust the algorithms over what I think.
“Now just think how many republicans in New Orleans are like me and would LOVE to FINALLY have a choice worth voting for.”

I hear you, but there’s no way to do this without putting at least one, maybe two seats at risk. If you’re trying to be ruthlessly partisan—and both parties are right now—you also have to make sure you don’t overreach. Do you want 5-1 guaranteed or a hopeful 6-0 that could become 4-2 bc you have spread more Democratic voters around instead of concentrating them into the one solidly Democratic district? It’s a reasonable choice either way in my opinion.
Prof. Eric Vogelin had a very interesting life as an Austrian intellectual who fled the Nazis and was an important 20th century thinker.
Here are some stats courtesy of AI that justify some serious optimism:

5 Advanced statistics from his standout rookie campaign show that New Orleans Saints quarterback Tyler Shough was highly efficient. He ranked near the top of the league in avoiding mistakes despite working with one of the NFL's shortest average pocket times (\(1.9\) seconds) and highest receiver drop rates.Key Advanced Statistics from his First Year:Completion Rate: Posted a \(67.6\%\) completion percentage, including a \(103.3\) passer rating on third downs (leading the entire NFL).Clean Decision-Making: Registered a low turnover-worthy play rate of roughly \(1.9\%\) during his stint as a starter.
"But the price of driving from baton rouge, paying for parking, food, drinks just got to be too much. If ive lived in the city i would definitely get them again."

This is exactly why I gave up my LSU season tix and kept the Saints, just from the living in N.O. perspective. At least for me, another big factor was that my longtime LSU pregame folks kinda scattered over the years so that became less of a draw than it had been, especially for lesser games. I still make games but do miss knowing the people around me in the seats.
"bullshite. We lose election because people elect losers like Thune who don’t do shite when in the majority. Then voters see that, get discouraged and stay home.

If there is a bloodbath in November it won’t be over gas prices (which will be back down by then) it’ll be because of a lack of fight in most GOP politicians."

The scary thing is that people believe stuff like this.
Fair enough but I also see it as WAY down the list of concerns. Sure, do some bobblehead giveaways, etc., but I don’t remember any of that mattering much when the Pels were crowding 50 wins. Coaches and players matter most.
"because of the reputation they've earned for being Donald Sterling cheap"

In a way, it's worse because the Pelicans really aren't that cheap. Pels had the league's 12th highest payroll last year and still only won 25 games with a mostly healthy Zion. That's not cheap so much as incompetent. The saving grace of all this is that everything changes if you get a coach and star player who click and start to win.
Another one of those ‘magic words’ used to end debate and keep people quiet.“

While labels can be used in this way, that is absolutely NOT what Maher did. He laid out a compelling case, supported with facts.
This is exactly how I just voted.
“Only city with 2 in state for sure....its a scam of costing the city double”

Like I said, it’s probably not a bad idea, but it’s a state initiative to do away with having two positions.
“Also, I want every Indian gone. They have shown they are unwilling to assimilate.”

Admittedly based on anecdotal experiences, but I have not seen this at all. Are you talking about first or second generation?
It’s really the other way. The state is looking to do away with a position that has long existed. It’s probably not a bad idea to reduce the number of judges and the separate criminal clerk of court, but it’s the state that is seeking change the status quo.
"Asking the federal court to overrule the states constitution. Lol. Good luck with that one"

Agreed, and it is the state constitution as just construed by the state's highest court. I don't see how this has a chance.
It’s completely fair to consider the cost but you can’t overlook the significant contributions to get the full picture. Some calculate a net positive, others a negative, but this doesn’t take into account the cost of actually deporting people or, what is most important to me, the diminished focus on criminals and those with terrorist ties.
“ It's weird to me that this is even a question for someone that's not for mass illegal immigration.”

Full deportation is very difficult and almost certainly not achievable. Also, many in this country don’t want people deported who, for example, were not born here but came here as children. Especially given the massive cost and use of resources, I would prefer to stay focused on criminals and those with terrorist ties. Of course, any illegal alien would continue to live with the risk of deportation.
“why the frick should we willfully create a situation that requires the country's ability to adapt to adversity, trauma, tragedy and stress?”

My post addressed the situation in which we find ourselves. You will get no argument from that the decision(s) to ignore our immigration laws and—an invitation to lawlessness—was anything other than a big mistake.
"I don’t see blue areas doing what is necessary to make that happen."

Perhaps, but time and lived experience can do powerful things. NYC has been soft, hard, and soft again on crime just in my lifetime. Even San Fran has retreated from its peak idiocy. Things can change, both for good or ill, and indeed they always have.
"The problem is the stupid-high number of immigrants ..."

But this problem becomes manageable over time if the flow is stanched. I saw recently that as recently as 1970, the percentage of non-US born in the US was 5% and now it's around 15%. Given time, these numbers can change a lot based on the power of prospective policy.