- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: In case you had doubts about what's going to happen with fire destroyed lots in Cali-
Posted on 7/15/25 at 1:00 pm to SludgeFactory
Posted on 7/15/25 at 1:00 pm to SludgeFactory
it's what jesus would do
:
:
This post was edited on 7/15/25 at 1:01 pm
0
Posted on 7/15/25 at 1:01 pm to TigerB8
With the government involved, nothing will ever be built on those properties
Posted on 7/15/25 at 1:05 pm to 632627
quote:
Not pacific palisades
In case you missed it, they already rolled out a development master plan for pacific palisades that included massive section 8 developments.
Posted on 7/15/25 at 1:05 pm to East Coast Band
Posted on 7/15/25 at 1:05 pm to TigerB8
This is happening in Guadalupe County Texas in a different way. These corporate building groups are buying farmland and building 2000 unit developments of 1000-1250 square foot house right against the county line of Comal where New Braunfels is located. Now all the problems of San Antonio can come to what was once a safer community. Guadalupe wants the tax base so that they can grow a traditionally poor county. It sucks because New Braunfels and Comal County have no means to prevent this
This post was edited on 7/15/25 at 1:07 pm
Posted on 7/15/25 at 1:06 pm to TigerB8
Section 8 and Homelessness
The American Dream
The American Dream
Posted on 7/15/25 at 1:07 pm to beaux duke
quote:
the druggies
Can live in rehab until they get clean. Otherwise they should be put on work crews cleaning up the areas they trash up.
quote:
illegals have to live somewhere
Yes, their home country. The city, state and federal government have no obligation to house anyone, much less people who aren't supposed to be here in the first place.
Taking this property is just another example of the government not understanding the problem (thus providing the wrong "fix"), not caring if what they are doing only looks good (and thus continues to prove to be ineffective), or both.
The problem isn't that they are homeless, the problem is what leads the majority of them to be homeless in the first place and that is overwhelmingly addiction.
Posted on 7/15/25 at 1:10 pm to Giantkiller
quote:
here's their chance, albeit against their will. You get what you vote for. Have fun.
Two liberal women just lost their jobs for saying the same about Texas floods. Not everyone living there were democrats.
Posted on 7/15/25 at 1:14 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Should they just do nothing and tell everyone to rebuild and good luck to them?
yes.
Posted on 7/15/25 at 1:15 pm to TigerB8
Just watch every one of these liberal politicians will have friends and family members who are involved in the process and will get paid for doing nothing. They will be awarded contracts and subcontract it right out to someone else. It will be layered like a motherfricker.
Posted on 7/15/25 at 1:15 pm to TigerB8
40% of the best real estate saved for losers who can't afford it.
Amazing
Amazing
Posted on 7/15/25 at 1:16 pm to rob0710
quote:
Two liberal women just lost their jobs for saying the same about Texas floods.
not tell us the rest of the story as to why they lost their jobs. You know, the part about the loss of adolescent life? the drowning, dead kids. You need to add that part.
You know, just for context. Apples and oranges and all.
Posted on 7/15/25 at 1:25 pm to TigerB8
quote:
$101 million
In fairness, this is probably a single 175 unit multi family project.
Posted on 7/15/25 at 1:39 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
What specifically is it that everyone hates about this plan? Should they just do nothing and tell everyone to rebuild and good luck to them?
1.) it is high value land and people who can afford it should live there. You don't give 40% of the most valuable land to crackheads and criminals. They haven't earned it.
2.) nobody who can afford to live on the beach wants to be neighbors with a multi unit project with riff raff congregating, smoking drugs, and bringing crime to their block.
Posted on 7/15/25 at 1:41 pm to Bard
quote:
So they are going to appropriate ~40% of the properties under eminent domain then build government crack houses on them?
Sounds like another great idea by California politicians to bring jobs and families back to CA.
I wonder how many Section 8 multi unit apartments are being built down the block from Gavin Newscum and Nancy Pukelosi's homes?
Posted on 7/15/25 at 2:19 pm to oklahogjr
quote:
Should they just do nothing and tell everyone to rebuild and good luck to them?
Yes. That is absolutely what they should do. Why should they do anything different?
If it's My land... and MY house that burned down.. why should I not be able to rebuild it? What's YOUR reasoning for me not being able to rebuild MY house on MY land that burned down?
Posted on 7/15/25 at 2:21 pm to Bard
quote:
So they are going to appropriate ~40% of the properties under eminent domain then build government crack houses on them?
ie Communism
Posted on 7/15/25 at 2:23 pm to beaux duke
quote:
like it or not not, the unfortuante, the druggies and yes, the illegals have to live somewhere. might as well buy some of it for pennies on the dollar.
That's a tremendous amount of fricking stupid for this early in the day. Usually shite like this is posted late at night.
JFC.
Posted on 7/15/25 at 2:24 pm to Bard
quote:
So they are going to appropriate ~40% of the properties under eminent domain then build government crack houses on them
I did not see that in the article did you?
The Hotshot Wakeup had 2 guests on his podcast last week talking about the fires. One of them mentioned that many of the homes were people who were not “wealthy” the houses were bought 50+ years ago and passed down generation after generation. Now that the home is gone the resident can’t afford to rebuild because many or most did not have insurance and costs are too damn high today. So they sell their land and move on with their life.
My guess is that is where these CA funds will be spent. Make it to difficult and expensive to rebuild and force people to sell. Not exactly eminent domain but same results.
The entire situation was a cluster frick, both city and state failed on so many levels and knew years ago this would happen. From not maintaining and stocking the reservoirs to not mandating prescribed burns and landscaping regulations to not ensuring the fire started on NYE was fully extinguished to the power company starting the secondary fire because they had live wires to transistors that were supposed to be decommissioned to falsifying records after the fact to cover this up.
This could have been 100% preventable.
I forget which town they said is going to burn to the ground next but all the mistakes made with Palisades apply to many of the communities in the hills there.
Posted on 7/15/25 at 2:35 pm to FightinTigersDammit
quote:
Section 8 coastal
Rename the town. Great name
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News