Started By
Message

re: If Biden won 2020 legitimately

Posted on 7/19/26 at 8:36 pm to
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
49752 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

You keep saying there copious evidence, then claiming there’s no evidence because there’s never been an adequate investigation. It’s a completely circular argument.

no it is not - the circular argument is in the opposite direction - demanding that enough 'evidence' be brought forward that would chance the result before they would look at it = but nobody who was searching for that level of evidence was allowed anywhere near the data.

It was a sham and a cover-up of the sham protected by crooked democrat officials and judges whose favorite recitation was 'no staning' - and by the way - you only had a couple of weeks do individually do what a whole department should have been devoting their full day toward - that is IF they had any inclination to determine whether or nor their election was actually fair and secure.

They knew it was as foul as a bucket of warm donkey shite - and wanted no part of having to shoe their work to the public.

It Is a so obvious axiom - IF they have the goods that proved there was not enough fraud to change the result - THEY would be the ones heralding it to the public - ESPECIALLY around election time,.

But they guard that perfect evidence with maximum zeal = it is as if they do not WANT the public to realize how PERFECT iit was.

Make that make sense - In the past 5 years they have spent 1000 times the effort hiding their work from review while claiming it is next to perfection and demanding the somehow the public have the onus of 'proving there was enough fraud to change the outcome.:

They KNOW that a weeks worth of effort would have settled the case - but they also knew that result would have put them out of work..
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140624 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 8:36 pm to
quote:

Whose fault would that be?
The AG who lied to the POTUS.
But frankly, I don't give a rat's arse whose "fault" it was. I care about ensuring any relative mistake/corruption does not happen again
Posted by Branson
Member since Dec 2023
405 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 8:37 pm to
Georgia’s statewide hand audit was conducted under the supervision of the Secretary of State’s office with election officials in all 159 counties




So it was supervised by Brad Raffensperger. You don't see a fox guarding the henhouse scenario played out here?
Posted by CrystalPreserves
Member since May 2019
4942 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 8:39 pm to
I’ve noticed something. Every time the evidence gets thin, somebody volunteers to become the entertainment instead.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140624 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 8:42 pm to
quote:

I’ve noticed something. Every time the evidence gets thin
I’ve noticed something. You could not care less about evidence. You care about results.
Posted by TTOWN RONMON
Member since Oct 2023
1693 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 8:43 pm to
Everyone knows what happened in 2020. Dems on their perverted agenda can't get elected, so the far left decided the only way to get their perverted commie agenda passed was to start crooking elections.

When DeSantis won Florida became VERY RED, because he cracked down on the BS shenanigans. Georgia did not vote for Biden, nor those two Dem senators, they stuffed ballot boxes and had inside info on the voters who rarely voted and voted for them.

You people are just naive simpletons. So we heard Russia for 5 years, I knew in 2017 it was BS, yet you guys want us to think you really think the CIA/FBI were not in the tank for Biden.. LOL
Posted by CrystalPreserves
Member since May 2019
4942 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

So it was supervised by Brad Raffensperger. You don't see a fox guarding the henhouse scenario played out here?


Raffensperger did not personally sit in a room and recount Georgia’s ballots. Election workers across all 159 counties manually counted the paper ballots, and the statewide total confirmed the machine-tabulated winner. The Trump campaign then requested another recount, which confirmed the outcome again. Georgia also partnered with the GBI on a separate absentee-signature audit in Cobb County.
LINK

Posted by CrystalPreserves
Member since May 2019
4942 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

I’ve noticed something.


No, I care whether the evidence supports the result being claimed. You seem to care about preserving the claim even after the evidence utterly fails to support it. That’s why every audit, recount, court loss, and rejected allegation becomes part of some conspiracy in your maga riddled mind.
That isn’t following evidence wherever it leads. It’s refusing to let it lead anywhere you don’t like.
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
21332 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 10:39 pm to
quote:

CrystalPreserves


What's the date in your link?
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
91926 posts
Posted on 7/19/26 at 11:56 pm to
LINK

Auditing Biden’s ‘Victory’
A veteran CPA lays it all out for you.

quote:
There’s more. Not in 150 years has a candidate whose vote total jumped as much as Trump’s did from one election to the next ended up losing the election.



quote:
When Pennsylvania’s ballots were counted, the total number exceeded by 202,000 the number of registered voters.



quote:
Yes, Trump’s lawyers have lost dozens of election challenges in courts – but it’s rarely mentioned that he’s lost most of them “on the basis of procedure or process.” Of the thirty cases decided on merit, notes Fried, Trump won 22.



quote:

CrystalPreserves


what an embarrassment. even for a commie here.

LINK

debunk those links. well over 100 of them. when u can get back to me. you cannot because you are a left wing liar.

go stuff ur face with some fig preserves it will make you shite because you are definitely full of shite.
This post was edited on 7/19/26 at 11:59 pm
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63841 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:21 am to
quote:

no it is not - the circular argument is in the opposite direction - demanding that enough 'evidence' be brought forward that would chance the result before they would look at it = but nobody who was searching for that level of evidence was allowed anywhere near the data.
Nope. Some of y'all act as if a court must approve investigations. Thats simply not the case.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
63841 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:24 am to
quote:

I don't give a rat's arse whose "fault" it was. I care about ensuring any relative mistake/corruption does not happen again
As you noted GA changed their policies. But it’s never enough to stop Trump not his puppets from whining. Let’s be honest whining is a hell of a lot easier than governing.
This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 12:25 am
Posted by DeBoar
Member since Jan 2024
3484 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 12:52 am to
You’re definitely good at whining
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175325 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 1:02 am to
quote:

There was virtually zero investigation by anyone other than independent sources for 5yrs

Why would you want the sources to not be independent?
Posted by ronricks
Member since Mar 2021
12940 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 4:10 am to
quote:

Everyone knows what happened in 2020

Mass mail in voting enabled by The Cares Act Trump signed.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140624 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 4:34 am to
quote:

Why would you want the sources to not be independent?
Because the Pillow Man and Lin Wood lacked the requisite resources, training, and access.
Posted by CrystalPreserves
Member since May 2019
4942 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 4:52 am to
Bubba that’s not “the evidence.” It is a crowdsourced filing cabinet containing allegations, affidavits, procedural complaints, news links, statistical speculation, and items of wildly different quality.

Pick the strongest one. Tell me exactly what it establishes, who verified it, how many unlawful votes it identifies, and whether that number could have changed the certified result.

If it survives scrutiny, I’ll say so. If it doesn’t, ninety-nine more weak claims won’t carry it across the finish line.

The burden is not on me to shovel through your whole barn. It is on you to point to the horse that can actually run. That website is just a pile o’ links submitted by people who already believed the conclusion beforehand.
This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 4:56 am
Posted by BrianKellysbuyout
Member since Nov 2025
1896 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 5:08 am to
That's because it was stolen.
Posted by icecreamsnowball
Member since Mar 2025
1536 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 5:23 am to
quote:

Just trying to gauge where your mind set is at on this issue.

I will answer for him. Yes, he believes Joe Biden legitimately won in 2020.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140624 posts
Posted on 7/20/26 at 5:53 am to
quote:

As you noted GA changed their policies. But it’s never enough
You've delved to silliness several times in this thread. GA did indeed change their policies. It is possible those changes will be effective.

But without knowledge of underlying facts, the remedy is simply a best guess.

---

Here's a fun side story:

As the French undertook to build a canal traversing Panama, malaria became a huge problem. Their open-air hospital wards were packed. I say "open-air" because the French guessed that Miasma, or “bad air” arising from swamps, decaying vegetation, and foul odor was the cause of malaria. So the facilities were designed to allow breezes through the wards, to clear the miasma air out.

Worse yet, ants were a major problem. They infested the hospital and surrounds. At night, the ants would find their way into patient beds. Particular to semicomatose malaria patients, there was strong correlation of ant bites to outcome.

The French were a bright lot though. They soon figured out a solution. They placed a saucer under each bed post of every hospital bed. Then they filled the saucers with water. Voila! Ant moats! The ant problem was solved!

But for some reason, the "bad malarial air" around the hospital got much worse. Mosquitoes breeding in the ant moats were a nuisance as well. Tens of thousands died from malaria before the entire project collapsed in 1888.

When the US took the project over, and Dr. Gorgas arrived on site, there was a ton of ridicule from TaxingAuthority types at his focus on mosquitoes. They growled that he was focused on bugs while patients were dying in the hospital. Soon, malaria went away and Miasma Theory with it.

Just a random story to start the day.
This post was edited on 7/20/26 at 6:09 am
Jump to page
Page First 14 15 16 17 18 ... 27
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 16 of 27Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram