re: If Biden won 2020 legitimately

Georgia’s hand audit was an investigation into whether the reported outcome matched the paper ballots. Arizona’s Republican-led Senate review was an investigation. Wisconsin’s legislative audit was an investigation. The DOJ received allegations, reviewed them, and said it found no evidence sufficient to change the outcome. Courts reviewed evidence where procedure allowed them to.

You can argue those efforts were inadequate. You can argue they reached the wrong conclusion. What you can’t honestly argue is that they never happened.

And “62 cases, none reviewed the evidence” is simply not an accurate description baw. Some cases were dismissed on procedural grounds, some on the merits, and in several the courts expressly addressed the evidence presented and found it insufficient.

If your position requires every investigation that doesn’t validate your conclusion to be dismissed as “not an investigation,” then the conclusion has been insulated from being tested.

No matter how much you nu-UHH, there has never been any merit whatsoever to claims of fraud or interference.

quote:

---

CrystalPreserves

---

You sound concerned.

You’re piling allegations on top of procedural complaints and calling the heap proof. Fine. Investigate Fulton County’s ballot controls. Investigate missing images, mishandled test ballots, negligent officials, and anything Chris Wray may have buried. But none of that establishes that 17,500 unlawful Biden ballots were inserted, counted, and certified. That is the bridge you keep pointing at without ever laying a plank.

And “there was no investigation” has become little more than a refuge from the record. Georgia conducted a statewide hand audit and recount. Arizona’s Republican led Senate commissioned its own review. Wisconsin’s Republican Legislature ordered an audit. The Justice Department examined allegations. Courts rejected some claims procedurally and others on the evidence presented.

You may call those efforts inadequate. You may quarrel with their conclusions. But you do not get to erase them because they failed to hand you the verdict you came looking for. The 51 intelligence officials, Chinese license claims, standing rulings, ballot-image discrepancies, and election complaints are separate matters. Reciting them in one breath does not forge them into proof that enough fraudulent votes were counted to change the result.

So bring the chain. Identify the unlawful ballots. Show how they entered the count. Show where they were counted. Show how the number was verified. Until then, you’ve got a saddlebag full of suspicion and not one stamped receipt.

And since you still haven’t produced the evidence, I believe that leaves your king with nowhere left to move bubba.

quote:

---

You’re piling allegations on top of procedural complaints and calling the heap proof. Fine. Investigate Fulton County’s ballot controls. Investigate missing images, mishandled test ballots, negligent officials, and anything Chris Wray may have buried. But none of that establishes that 17,500 unlawful Biden ballots were inserted, counted, and certified. That is the bridge you keep pointing at without ever laying a plank.

---

If there had been an investigation, you would have a point. You are yammering that a case which has yet to be investigated lacks proof. I've never claimed otherwise btw. The difference is you are satisfied to suppress investigation, and take Racheal Maddow's word for the "truth."

OTOH, I simply want an actual investigation. E.g., I want documentation that the tens of thousands of fake Chinese IDs intercepted in advance of the 2020 election were simultaneously individually requested to enable illegal drinking by those CCP affiliates. If it turns out that was the case, fine. Do I think that is likely? Not at all. But I am open to the facts.

quote:

---

Yeah that’s a real deep dive you’ve got setup here

---

Take the plunge nitwit. Name names, count heads.

Let's start with the DOJ. How many federal agents were deployed to 2020 election sites prior to 2025?

quote:

---

Let's try this again. How many federal agents were deployed to review 2020 election concerns prior to J6?

---

Whose fault would that be?

quote:

---

there has never been any merit whatsoever to claims of fraud or interference.

---

Il lhave somme of what you are drinking

Question - how does the impeachments against trump and the weight of government befalling anyone associated with J6 compare to the actions taken to investigete 2020 election concerns.

quote:

---

This is weird. You keep saying there copious evidence, then claiming there’s no evidence because there’s never been an adequate investigation

---

This is really weird. You keep saying there was no copious evidence but there in fact was. The boasbergs said there was no standing during Obama third term. Imagine that. Enjoy what is coming chief.

quote:

---

Il lhave somme of what you are drinking Question - how does the impeachments against trump and the weight of government befalling anyone associated with J6 compare to the actions taken to investigete 2020 election concerns.

---

Different subject entirely, bubba.

Whether you think Trump was over-investigated, under-investigated, fairly investigated, or politically targeted has no bearing on whether claims of widespread election fraud were supported by evidence.

If your argument is that investigators behaved unfairly, make that argument. If your argument is that the election was stolen, then produce the evidence that supports it. One claim doesn’t become true because you’re unhappy with how another claim was handled.