- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Hard no on Barbara Lagoa
Posted on 9/20/20 at 6:08 pm to GEAUXmedic
Posted on 9/20/20 at 6:08 pm to GEAUXmedic
If this is from her confirmation hearing from a lower court, it’s one hundred percent the right answer. Noncommittal and fact-based for lower courts.
It seems like she is saying the opposite actually.
It seems like she is saying the opposite actually.
0
Posted on 9/20/20 at 6:21 pm to GEAUXmedic
Oh for fricks sake, get over roe vs wade
Conservatives live in the past
Conservatives live in the past
Posted on 9/20/20 at 6:34 pm to GEAUXmedic
I think "settled law" is settled until it's not. With the right challenge and I think one could revisit "settled law". Not sure it's a good idea to do that in just a contentious environment but just an opinion.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 6:36 pm to GEAUXmedic
Not a problem IMO.
And Trump could do a lot worse and still improve the court over where it was during the latter part of RBG’s tenure.
And Trump could do a lot worse and still improve the court over where it was during the latter part of RBG’s tenure.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 6:39 pm to GEAUXmedic
The Court doesn’t make laws. They interpret the law.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 6:53 pm to GEAUXmedic
What is wrong with her comments?
Her job as a judge isn’t to interpret law, it is to apply the law as written.
She should not be a judicial activist.
As a lower court judge, he position is to rule based on the previous Supreme Court rulings, not to interpret them based on her political/personal opinions.
From the position of a lower court judge, her job is to rule based on the precedents set in previous cases.
You want to change R v W, charge it at the level of the Supreme Court.
Her answers in the OP are wholly appropriate and the exact mindset I would want from a lower court judge.
Her job as a judge isn’t to interpret law, it is to apply the law as written.
She should not be a judicial activist.
As a lower court judge, he position is to rule based on the previous Supreme Court rulings, not to interpret them based on her political/personal opinions.
From the position of a lower court judge, her job is to rule based on the precedents set in previous cases.
You want to change R v W, charge it at the level of the Supreme Court.
Her answers in the OP are wholly appropriate and the exact mindset I would want from a lower court judge.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 6:55 pm to GEAUXmedic
She saidnits settled for LOWER court judges, NOT Supreme Court judges.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 6:56 pm to Scruffy
quote:
Her job as a judge isn’t to interpret law, it is to apply the law as written.
She should not be a judicial activist.
As a lower court judge, he position is to rule based on the previous Supreme Court rulings, not to interpret them based on her political/personal opinions.
Exactly. Scruffy has brain that works. Thanks
Posted on 9/20/20 at 7:13 pm to GEAUXmedic
Those were questions in regard to her a position in the Appellate Circuit Court - a Court that is subservient to the US Supreme Court. She has an obligation to uphold Supreme Court decisions as a member of a lower court. That is not necessarily transitive to holding a position on the US Supreme Court.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 7:31 pm to Ollieoxenfree99
quote:
The right has got to let abortion GO.
The Military Intel Bureaucracy will disclose that they are working with Aliens from Jupiter before that happens.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 7:36 pm to GEAUXmedic
That is how we want a lower court judge ruling. She is to respect the supreme court decisions. The same jurist, but on the SCOTUS, can use her judgement.
Also, I have news for you. No matter how many jurists the Republicans appoint they are not substantially overturning Roe v Wade. I think 6 of the 9 on the court were appointed by Rep.
Also, I have news for you. No matter how many jurists the Republicans appoint they are not substantially overturning Roe v Wade. I think 6 of the 9 on the court were appointed by Rep.
This post was edited on 9/20/20 at 7:38 pm
Posted on 9/20/20 at 8:00 pm to xGeauxLSUx
quote:
she's a Federalist Society memeber
Trump's first two years showed what a bunch of pussies make up the Federalist Society.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 8:38 pm to GEAUXmedic
You understand she's bound to follow it as a lower court judge, right?
Posted on 9/20/20 at 9:36 pm to GEAUXmedic
Being pushed by Rubio...he is one of my senators and I want him primaried next go around. If Rubio is pushing her, she is a no go.
This post was edited on 9/20/20 at 10:16 pm
Posted on 9/20/20 at 9:46 pm to TheHarahanian
quote:
I think her responses are typical. In fact I think Kav made similar responses
Kav has caved on a few things too. We need a justice in the Scalia mold.
This post was edited on 9/20/20 at 9:53 pm
Posted on 9/20/20 at 9:52 pm to GEAUXmedic
Good Lord, the stupid is strong in this thread.
This information is taken from her confirmation questionnaire/process for a LOWER court. Of COURSE she says she will abide by SCOTUS precedent, pending a change in direction from SCOTUS.
Who ties your shoes for you each morning?
Posted on 9/20/20 at 10:04 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
n Pryor replace the next 2
PUHLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE make this happen!
need my baw in there! he can replace breyer!
Posted on 9/20/20 at 10:06 pm to GEAUXmedic
Did trump ever say his goal in selecting supremes.... was to overturn roe v wade?
Posted on 9/20/20 at 10:08 pm to Ollieoxenfree99
quote:
The right has got to let abortion GO.
They never will, its such a dumb hill to die on.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 10:10 pm to TomBuchanan
states will still perform it. over turning roe v wade will not stop it it will leave it up to states as it should be.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News