- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Disney Previews the First 30 Minutes of “Lightyear” at CinemaCon
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:17 am to Jon Ham
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:17 am to Jon Ham
quote:
When it comes to young, impressionable children with developing minds it certainly fricking is.
If you saw a gay couple going into a store you and your young kid were about to walk into, would you react the same way (avoid going in to expose your child) you would with this movie?
3
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:19 am to Azkiger
quote:
If you saw a gay couple going into a store you and your young kid were about to walk into, would you react the same way (avoid going in to expose your child) you would with this movie?
He would give it to them and tell his wife they have to start over.
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:28 am to Jon Ham
quote:
When it comes to young, impressionable children with developing minds it certainly fricking is.
So just seeing people have a quick kiss on a movie is going to imprint so significantly on a child that they will eventually turn gay?
I see the "they are 3% of the population" thing a lot on here. Okay, go into Target/Walmart/any large store. 200 people could be in there at a time, so thats ~6 people they could come into contact with just on a trip to the store. Should you stop bringing your child shopping?
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:29 am to Froman
quote:
it’s just an accurate reflection of the type of people that exist in the world.
at 3% an accurate representation would be every 100 movies there's a gay couple in 3 of them.
Do you feel what's out there is an accurate representation or highly inflated?
Serious question, what is the last Hollywood produced content you've watched without a gay couple or trans character?
This post was edited on 4/29/22 at 7:30 am
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:31 am to TrussvilleTide
quote:
So just seeing people have a quick kiss on a movie is going to imprint so significantly on a child that they will eventually turn gay?
I see the "they are 3% of the population" thing a lot on here. Okay, go into Target/Walmart/any large store. 200 people could be in there at a time, so thats ~6 people they could come into contact with just on a trip to the store. Should you stop bringing your child shopping?
I can't avoid shopping. I sure as hell can, and will avoid this movie though.
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:34 am to OldSouth
quote:
I can't avoid shopping. I sure as hell can, and will avoid this movie though.
You're going to be avoiding a lot of movies. This trend isn't going away.
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:36 am to TrussvilleTide
Maybe this whole lgbt thing is part of natural selection. Couple generations and they will be no -existent since they cannot procreate without the heterosexual component. Natures way of culling the defective
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:37 am to TrussvilleTide
This isn’t inclusion it’s propaganda - is huge difference- and the numbers are proving that it’s working - it started with Seinfeld and has been ramped up ever sense - at least we now know you aren’t born that way but that it’s 100% about acceptance not biology. That’s to the left for proving this point.
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:38 am to TrussvilleTide
quote:Fine by me. Natural law isn't going anywhere either.
You're going to be avoiding a lot of movies. This trend isn't going away.
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:43 am to NashvilleTider
quote:
it started with Seinfeld
I remember all my friends turning into Jews when this was airing
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:45 am to Froman
quote:
How is this even news? It would be unrealistic if there WASN’T a gay person in a movie or tv show. People need to chill on making a big deal whenever they see a same sex couple on their tv. It’s not being “woke”, it’s just an accurate reflection of the type of people that exist in the world.
Yes there are LGBQXZYSDF people all over the place. I mean they make up about 70% of the population just like interracial couples in all the commercials post the St George of Fentanyl riots last year. And I always want my young impressionable kids exposed to this just like they should be expose to Hetero porn.
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:48 am to Froman
Wow
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:49 am to Azkiger
quote:
If you saw a gay couple going into a store you and your young kid were about to walk into, would you react the same way (avoid going in to expose your child) you would with this movie?
Well the difference is it is real life and MY child is with me and he/she can bring their questions to me. Not some weird arse depiction being exposed to my child in a subconscious way in a movie. And as stated before, 3%. Not 25 of 50% shown by the freaks that now make these movies.
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:51 am to TrussvilleTide
quote:
You're going to be avoiding a lot of movies. This trend isn't going away.
You keep going to them and visiting Disney then. A vast majority of the population won’t because they get the propaganda and you are to naive or stupid too.
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:52 am to TrussvilleTide
quote:
I see the "they are 3% of the population" thing a lot on here. Okay, go into Target/Walmart/any large store. 200 people could be in there at a time, so thats ~6 people they could come into contact with just on a trip to the store. Should you stop bringing your child shopping?
Are retail stores popular places to make out in your neck of the woods?
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:53 am to jimmy the leg
Black female bosses are prevalent but competency is heavily overstated in a lot of cases
Both direct bosses like this I have had have been great. But they were also competent at their work before being moved to management.
Same offices have a history of black women promoted and constantly transferred around in an attempt to minimize the damaged caused by them being lazy, greedy, stupid, or just plain insane.
Everyone knew what was going on and people would ask in job interviews “Is this a real interview or is this window-dressing to give S another promotion?” And they would get shocked and deny the latter then inevitably give her the job.
This kind of person is the personification of “A people hire A people, C people hire D people”, as the competent want other competent people around while less competent people want dumber people hired to make themselves look better.
Both direct bosses like this I have had have been great. But they were also competent at their work before being moved to management.
Same offices have a history of black women promoted and constantly transferred around in an attempt to minimize the damaged caused by them being lazy, greedy, stupid, or just plain insane.
Everyone knew what was going on and people would ask in job interviews “Is this a real interview or is this window-dressing to give S another promotion?” And they would get shocked and deny the latter then inevitably give her the job.
This kind of person is the personification of “A people hire A people, C people hire D people”, as the competent want other competent people around while less competent people want dumber people hired to make themselves look better.
This post was edited on 4/29/22 at 7:55 am
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:55 am to Esquire
What a moron - “ not that there’s anything wrong with that“ ruined our country.
Homosexuality is an abomination - tons wrong with it. It goes against natural law, evolution is the faith you subscribe to it goes against that as well.
The Saints of old were right about TV and movies we should’ve avoideded them completely.
Homosexuality is an abomination - tons wrong with it. It goes against natural law, evolution is the faith you subscribe to it goes against that as well.
The Saints of old were right about TV and movies we should’ve avoideded them completely.
This post was edited on 4/29/22 at 7:59 am
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:56 am to musick
quote:You are really bad at math and logic. Does every movie you watch have only one character / couple in them?
at 3% an accurate representation would be every 100 movies there's a gay couple in 3 of them
BTW, the Marvel character was a lesbian in the comics, so Disney didn't change anything. Now consider all the Disney characters in all the Disney movies / TV shows.
Posted on 4/29/22 at 7:58 am to NashvilleTider
quote:
The Saints of old were right about TV and movies we should’ve avoideded them completely.
What’s stopping you?
Posted on 4/29/22 at 8:02 am to mmcgrath
No, they didn’t change anything about her, but the character is a fairly newish one given all the Marvel characters to pull from and honestly not as interesting as a lot of others.
Chavez is a standard “flying brick” archetype who happens to be a lesbian Latina with two mommies. The “flying brick” is pretty much the standard superhero which isn’t of much interest because they either destroy everything too easily or they get knocked out in some way so they can make the villain seem like a threat.
If they wanted to pull any character from the multiverse of Marvel in, there were tons of others they could have used and yet they chose her.
Chavez is a standard “flying brick” archetype who happens to be a lesbian Latina with two mommies. The “flying brick” is pretty much the standard superhero which isn’t of much interest because they either destroy everything too easily or they get knocked out in some way so they can make the villain seem like a threat.
If they wanted to pull any character from the multiverse of Marvel in, there were tons of others they could have used and yet they chose her.
Page 2 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News