14
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Correct me if I’m wrong, the USSC interprets the law right?
Posted on 6/30/26 at 8:49 pm
Posted on 6/30/26 at 8:49 pm
Why doesn’t a republican majority congress and a republican president pass laws to prevent anchor babies?
Posted on 6/30/26 at 8:51 pm to Jack Daniel
Because Dems and Republicans are all against the people. The D or R is irrelevant once someone is elected. See Cassidy as an example and Letlow will be as well if elected.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 8:52 pm to Jack Daniel
There truly is the DC UNIPARTY!!!! TRUMP is trying to kill it, but it does exist!
Posted on 6/30/26 at 8:53 pm to Jack Daniel
Because people would rather elect retarded grifters who will own the libs on Twitter instead of actually represent people. The ones who actually introduce meaningful legislation get voted out for "grandstanding"
Posted on 6/30/26 at 8:55 pm to Jack Daniel
If the constitutional republic falls it will be through incremental progressivism and the judiciary is playing as big a role in the fall as any other US Institution.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 8:55 pm to Jack Daniel
You need a constitutional amendment which requires 2/3 majority in house and senate.
Good fricking luck.
Especially now that we have yet another ruling in favor of shitting out citizens.
Good fricking luck.
Especially now that we have yet another ruling in favor of shitting out citizens.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 9:01 pm to Jack Daniel
quote:
Jack Daniel
:lol: :lol: :lol:Posted on 6/30/26 at 9:02 pm to Jack Daniel
As I just said in another post it comes down to votes in both the House and Senate. The House can probably get it passed but it would die in the Senate because there aren’t enough votes.
Even among the Republican ranks you would have trouble getting every Republican Senator to buy in and vote to do something to fix all this. Susan Collins and others would almost certainly not support fixing any of these problems. Some Senators wouldn’t do it just because Trump wants it done.
Even among the Republican ranks you would have trouble getting every Republican Senator to buy in and vote to do something to fix all this. Susan Collins and others would almost certainly not support fixing any of these problems. Some Senators wouldn’t do it just because Trump wants it done.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 9:34 pm to Jack Daniel
quote:
Why doesn’t a republican majority congress and a republican president pass laws to prevent anchor babies?
For the same reason that a democratic majority didn’t pass a law forbidding citizens to own guns - the constitution prevents it.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 9:36 pm to Jack Daniel
quote:
Why doesn’t a republican majority congress and a republican president pass laws to prevent anchor babies?
They literally can't without passing a constitutional amendment. That will probably never happen again.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 10:32 pm to Robin Masters
Even a proposed constitutional amendment on anchor babies would not withstand Supreme Court review, as it would in itself be deemed in violation of the 14th amendment
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:01 pm to Jack Daniel
ACB should have recused herself from the opinion due to her 2 Haitian children.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:04 pm to Jack Daniel
quote:
Why doesn’t a republican majority congress and a republican president pass laws to prevent anchor babies?
That is an absolutely stupid question with the RINOs in the Senate, all of whom have been there longer than Trump.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:15 pm to tarzana
quote:
Even a proposed constitutional amendment on anchor babies would not withstand Supreme Court review, as it would in itself be deemed in violation of the 14th amendment
This is retarded.
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:16 pm to David_DJS
quote:
This is retarded.
Right...that's not how amendments work
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:16 pm to broadhead
This is the correct answer and people forget that before Trump every Republican presidential candidate was pro illegal immigration. Rubio and Cruz weren’t but they were both too scared to be public about it.
This post was edited on 6/30/26 at 11:18 pm
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:20 pm to Penrod
quote:
For the same reason that a democratic majority didn’t pass a law forbidding citizens to own guns - the constitution prevents it
Blows my mind you have to spell this out for people.
They never consider the long term consequences of these ideas
Posted on 6/30/26 at 11:35 pm to Jack Daniel
Correct me if I’m wrong. Chain migration is not mentioned in the 14th amendment. Could we not just make that aspect illegal*? After all, this is the main objective of dropping your baby here.
*provided we had a functional majority
*provided we had a functional majority
Posted on 7/1/26 at 1:52 am to tarzana
quote:
Even a proposed constitutional amendment on anchor babies would not withstand Supreme Court review, as it would in itself be deemed in violation of the 14th amendment
The Constitution is the final say on the matter. That's exactly what the Supreme Court exists to ensure. If the Constitution says no birthright citizenship, then the Supreme Court says that. Amendments can be, and have been, repealed. It's not easy. But there is precedent.
This post was edited on 7/1/26 at 1:05 pm
Posted on 7/1/26 at 2:30 am to tarzana
Are you stupid or something?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News