Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:20430
Registered on:8/20/2005
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

People paid more for sugar in the 70s than now. The paid more for it in 2010...

What does any of that have to do with Americans paying about double for sugar than the world market price because of tariffs?
quote:

Yet it never happens. Thanks for confirming

Confirming that nobody is stupid enough to make an effort to respond to some meaningless request you made? Yeah, okay - I confirm that.

Fact is tariffs are often a burden on consumers. Not always, but often.
quote:

I mean at least its an attempt but nothing you posted is daily used goods for the average joe. Who the fack is buying tires daily, construction equipment lulz Purses?

lmao @ this being posted in a thread (even loosely) discussing economics.

quote:

How much from sugar and how much will It go up and whats the increase in price from products that use sugar

We don't have to guess. Americans have been paying about double the international price for sugar for 50 years or so.
quote:

How much will it increase provide the numbers

Will?

US sugar producers have been protected for decades with tariffs, which is why sugar in the US typically runs about double the price of sugar elsewhere.
quote:

Every single time with you ppl. Its always answering a question with a question :lol

Ever though that might be because you express yourself in text like a 3rd grader?

quote:

Can you provide an example of a daily used good thats price has increased from the evil tariffs yes or no?

Sugar

quote:

Since we know that you cant/wont just take the L and move along

I did. I guess that means I won something.
quote:

I laughed so hard at this I almost spit all over my laptop.

Same, but I've wasted enough minutes of my life trying to get jjdoc to understand his own opinions/beliefs. Good luck to you.
quote:

No im not. I said these tariffs will cause ZERO price increases on daily used goods.

Who in your view absorbs the tariff so it's not passed along to the consumer?

quote:

Fak its like dealing with my wife

I would imagine she'd have no more luck understanding the shite that flies off your fingertips than any of us do, so point taken.
quote:

Pick any daily used good you want and tell me which tariff has caused the price to increase causing everyday ppl to struggle

"causing everday ppl to struggle" means whatever you want it to mean.

You're agreeing that tariffs increase prices, but your point is no price increases matter enough to be concerned about - is that your argument?
quote:

no she wasn't. She wasn't even a vocalist. She was a guitarist who sang sometimes.

You've got them mixed up.

Ann is the cow with a great voice.

Nancy is the (fomerly) hot AF guitarist that needs to find another country to live in.
quote:

And a population of only 590k

Only about 123k votes separated Trump from Harris in a Trump rout in 2024.

123k is nothing.

This is seriously stupid.
quote:

I’d imagine the bar and disciplinary committee of whatever jurisdiction they are licensed wouldn’t be too friendly. They are notoriously liberal

Have Bondi pen the letter. It would be fun to watch the bar/disciplinary committee try to discipline the USAG.
quote:

Judge could find the parties and attorneys in contempt. Trump could pardon them. Attorneys would likely face disciplinary action.

The president's attorneys? If so, so what? In a literal sense, no rational world would give over 600 judges that nobody voted for the power to open borders, determine how many people are employed by the federal government, etc. I wouldn't worry about any repercussions if I was Trump and it's not like he's not experienced at dealing with bullshite legal action.
quote:

BBONDS25

Question for you - why can't Trump send a response to any fed district judge that went something like this, "Judge, your input is appreciated but this administration chooses to ignore your advice, as we do not believe you have the constitutional authority to run the executive branch of government" and then simply ignore all the noise?

Outside of precedent (I suppose), where do these district courts find the authority to preside over the day-to-day operation of the executive branch?
quote:

All they have to do is stop funding it

This is the answer to all the Dem nonsense.

Don't want to give DOGE access to info? Fine, your budget is 50% of what it was last year.

It's all about money.
quote:

Those states that give unequitable advantages by population are not always guaranteed to lean GOP.


Unequitable? Did you mean to use that term?

quote:

won't take much more migration to flip Wyoming and Montana, and even the Dakotas

It's going to take a lot to flip Wyoming and the Dakotas. First, the Dakotas are more red today than they were 50 years ago. SD for example - you're forgetting that Tom Daschle and George McGovern lorded over that state for more than a minute but a long time ago, so to see a Dem breakthrough and win a race here and there would not be unprecedented.

Wyoming ain't turning blue. FFS - the last Dem to win a congressional seat was back in the 70's and the state has voted 70% for Trump three elections in a row.
"Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine"

:rotflmao:
Trump needs to start steering Johnson and Thune to begin defunding the whole shoot'n match. Ultimately that's the control of fedgov that can't be contested with the judiciary.
quote:

The share of adults who reside in middle-class households fell from 61% in 1971 to 50% in 2021, according to a Pew Research Center analysis of government data.

Based on what? Not standard of living.
quote:

What the frick?

You don't think that's factual? You're clueless.
quote:

Oh you are one of those that seems to think that we could not have reached this point in tech without FREE TRADE!

I haven't seen free trade being discussed much the last few pages of this thread. I certainly am not arguing in support of free trade. I'm arguing against the notion that Americans don't have it really, really well today, and we're all better off than Americans were 75 years ago. That's different than an argument in support of free trade as it has been practiced the last 35 years.