Favorite team:Tulane 
Location:Mar-a-Lago
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:3223
Registered on:5/7/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
No one is trying to destroy themselves.

I can look past this isolated incident and not blame a whole race because of the ignorance of one man. I can also forgive him and move on.

This case has highlighted racial divides many of us thought were no longer there. To that I say, we need to all take more time to be empathetic and listen to each other. Both sides.
Well the jury includes a hijab wearing Muslim, 3 Hispanics, and 4 women.

All 12 jurors must vote to convict or he is acquitted.

The stand your ground law in effect at the time makes this complicated. He’s already said he felt threatened for his life based on whatever Metcalf said to him.

I will honor the verdict either way. These cases are always tough.
Karmelo Anthony lives with epilepsy and his family has described him as non violent, btw.

It’s a double edged sword. An acquittal would only come if Texas’ stand your ground law is as rock solid as conservatives claim it is. Time will tell.

It’s a conundrum for sure.
All you can do is rely on our system. It’s not perfect but it’s the best way to do it.

Or you could take the Trump approach and blame judges when the rule of law isn’t always in your favor.
He is a child. Can’t condone what he did but he is a child. Remember that. It’s a bad situation all around.
How much of this was Trump looking for his place in history? The attack on the nuclear sites was a big win for him. He probably felt the temptation to go bigger (as is his style).
Unknown if the victim instigated the altercation with a racial slur. I know opinions are divided on what reaction that warrants if true.
20 years from now, Israel’s strategy may indeed appear masterful in its calculated pragmatism.

By leveraging deep US strategic alignments on Iran’s nuclear threat and regional destabilization, Israel helped catalyze American military involvement that (without delivering a decisive “victory” for Washington) inflicted severe setbacks on Iran’s leadership, nuclear infrastructure, and proxy capabilities—devastating its position as Israel’s primary existential foe.

This pressure exposed Iran’s vulnerabilities, prompting quieter realignments among Sunni Arab states wary of Tehran, thereby advancing normalization trends and isolating Iran further.

Simultaneously, Epic Fury enabled Israel to establish a more robust security buffer in southern Lebanon, expanding defensible territory against Hezbollah at a time when international constraints were loosened by the broader conflict.

The way this has played out reflects Israel’s long-term playbook of turning adversarial momentum into tangible security gains, even amid costs to allies.

Say what you want about Israel, they played their hand masterfully.
quote:

House approves war powers resolution
BOOM

Proof we are a democracy and the executive doesn’t wield the military like some 15th century king.
This guy should be fired immediately.

Every case he was involved in should be overturned.

This is despicable. I’m sure he was a real joy to be married to.
quote:

I don’t think you understand how the UCMJ and “laws of war” truly impact our military service members. Most people on here throw a fit and say they won’t vote again because they didn’t get what they wanted quick enough.
Seriously no idea what this means.

Having said that, an enemy’s refusal to follow the laws of war doesn’t excuse us from having to follow it.

If Kuwait military aircraft also use this airport (possible if not likely) then it might actually be justified under the law. I think we would need more facts.
quote:

Correct and neither should we. Enemies don’t play fair in war.
Not a justification for not following the law of war.
I think the primary purpose of that is to allow those who are seeking an outlet and/or a connection with someone like them to find it.

If you’re not gay, you shouldn’t have a problem either way with it.
Good. This fund paved the way for Jan. 6 insurrectionists WHO ATTACKED POLICE to sue for damages.

Even Trump realized that was a bad idea :dunno:
That might not have aged well. But all politicians (and people) get caught up in moments from time to time.

His current policies are to ensure AI is properly regulated and the middle class (the vast majority of posters here) will be protected from those who stand to benefit exponentially from insider deals related to it (like the Trump family).
Have you even looked into this guy? He’s not that bad.
Have to say I’m against anything that could suppress the ability to vote.

Groups that rely heavily on mail-in voting (rural voters, overseas/military, shift workers, people with mobility issues) face the most friction from any new requirement. Even small added hurdles reduce turnout.
quote:

As far as being able to own a nuke argument, that falls under the definition of arms. Arms are commonly defined in constitutional law as weapons that an individual can carry so something like a missile or bomb does not fall under that.


You are obviously unfamiliar with the Davy Crockett nuke.

quote:

The Davy Crockett tactical nuclear weapon system was designed to be carried by two men. A well-trained team could emplace the weapon and ready it for fire in less than three minutes.
I love how everyone checks in as a supposed expert only to find they are misinformed. What determines “can be carried.”

Where did you even get this argument?