- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Baby Gabriel’s “Parents” Sue McKenna West for 100K for Not Killing Him in Abortion
Posted on 8/19/26 at 12:46 pm
Posted on 8/19/26 at 12:46 pm
LINK
The biological parents of Baby Gabriel, the infant saved from abortion by his surrogate mother McKenna West, are suing her for more than $100,000 after she refused their demand to kill him.
Nasheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed filed a countersuit against McKenna West, a 28-year-old nurse from Alaska, weeks before she gave birth in Texas on August 12 to their son, who was diagnosed with a serious and rare heart defect.
The couple had agreed to pay West $60,000 to carry their child under a contract that included an abortion clause allowing them to end Gabriel’s life if there were issues with the baby.
At around 20 weeks, the unborn child was diagnosed with hypoplastic left heart syndrome, a life-threatening congenital condition in which the left side of the heart is underdeveloped. West refused their request to abort and traveled to Texas, where state law recognizes the woman who gives birth as the mother.
West named the baby Gabriel. The biological parents now insist his name is Rumi.
Gilkar and Ahmed are asking a judge to award them more than $100,000 in damages from West for breaking the deal, plus unspecified damages for her alleged “malicious, outrageous conduct.”
Lincoln Wilson, an attorney for West, said Gilkar and Ahmed “haven’t given [West] anything since she declined to terminate the pregnancy.”
“She is seeking parentage of the child because she gave birth in Texas, and in Texas, if you give birth to a child, it’s your child,” Wilson said.
West has said the California couple repeatedly pressured her to abort after the diagnosis.
In a statement, she declared: “Every life matters. No woman should be forced to end the life of the baby she is carrying — including me … Baby Gabriel should receive a chance at life.”
On Monday, Baby Gabriel underwent a Norwood procedure, a complex palliative heart surgery that is typically the first of three operations required for infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome.
Attorney Lee Budner, representing the biological parents, said: “Rumi is now recuperating under the loving care of his parents and his heroic team of doctors, nurses, and medical staff.”
Budner added: “This is the last update on Rumi’s health that his family intends to share. His condition remains critical and complex, and his family seeks privacy in caring for their son on his long road to recovery.”
Budner described West’s ongoing claims to parentage as “baseless” and “in violation of multiple court orders out of both Alaska and California.” He said the biological parents “look forward to quickly defeating those claims as Rumi’s parents continue to focus on his health and safety above all else.”
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton intervened before the birth to ensure the baby received life-saving care. The biological parents have denied any intent to withhold treatment and stated in court filings that they respected West’s decision not to abort.
West continues her legal fight for custody of the child she carried and protected.
The biological parents of Baby Gabriel, the infant saved from abortion by his surrogate mother McKenna West, are suing her for more than $100,000 after she refused their demand to kill him.
Nasheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed filed a countersuit against McKenna West, a 28-year-old nurse from Alaska, weeks before she gave birth in Texas on August 12 to their son, who was diagnosed with a serious and rare heart defect.
The couple had agreed to pay West $60,000 to carry their child under a contract that included an abortion clause allowing them to end Gabriel’s life if there were issues with the baby.
At around 20 weeks, the unborn child was diagnosed with hypoplastic left heart syndrome, a life-threatening congenital condition in which the left side of the heart is underdeveloped. West refused their request to abort and traveled to Texas, where state law recognizes the woman who gives birth as the mother.
West named the baby Gabriel. The biological parents now insist his name is Rumi.
Gilkar and Ahmed are asking a judge to award them more than $100,000 in damages from West for breaking the deal, plus unspecified damages for her alleged “malicious, outrageous conduct.”
Lincoln Wilson, an attorney for West, said Gilkar and Ahmed “haven’t given [West] anything since she declined to terminate the pregnancy.”
“She is seeking parentage of the child because she gave birth in Texas, and in Texas, if you give birth to a child, it’s your child,” Wilson said.
West has said the California couple repeatedly pressured her to abort after the diagnosis.
In a statement, she declared: “Every life matters. No woman should be forced to end the life of the baby she is carrying — including me … Baby Gabriel should receive a chance at life.”
On Monday, Baby Gabriel underwent a Norwood procedure, a complex palliative heart surgery that is typically the first of three operations required for infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome.
Attorney Lee Budner, representing the biological parents, said: “Rumi is now recuperating under the loving care of his parents and his heroic team of doctors, nurses, and medical staff.”
Budner added: “This is the last update on Rumi’s health that his family intends to share. His condition remains critical and complex, and his family seeks privacy in caring for their son on his long road to recovery.”
Budner described West’s ongoing claims to parentage as “baseless” and “in violation of multiple court orders out of both Alaska and California.” He said the biological parents “look forward to quickly defeating those claims as Rumi’s parents continue to focus on his health and safety above all else.”
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton intervened before the birth to ensure the baby received life-saving care. The biological parents have denied any intent to withhold treatment and stated in court filings that they respected West’s decision not to abort.
West continues her legal fight for custody of the child she carried and protected.
Posted on 8/19/26 at 12:48 pm to Night Vision
Absolutely wicked couple. May God have mercy on their souls.
Posted on 8/19/26 at 12:49 pm to FooManChoo
quote:Or not.
May God have mercy on their souls.
Posted on 8/19/26 at 12:50 pm to Night Vision
quote:
The biological parents have denied any intent to withhold treatment and stated in court filings that they respected West’s decision not to abort.
They respect it so much they're suing?
Posted on 8/19/26 at 12:50 pm to FooManChoo
quote:
Absolutely wicked couple. May God have mercy on their souls.
They better change everything about themselves then...
This post was edited on 8/19/26 at 12:52 pm
Posted on 8/19/26 at 12:53 pm to FooManChoo
I'm done with the internet for today.
This post was edited on 8/19/26 at 1:00 pm
Posted on 8/19/26 at 12:54 pm to Night Vision
quote:
Attorney Lee Budner, representing the biological parents, said: “Rumi is now recuperating under the loving care of his parents and his heroic team of doctors, nurses, and medical staff.”
Loving care of his parents? They quite publicly ordered his death. Demons.
Posted on 8/19/26 at 12:56 pm to Night Vision
This is so fricked up.
Posted on 8/19/26 at 1:01 pm to Night Vision
Side note...
Both those dudes can't be the biological parents...
Both those dudes can't be the biological parents...
quote:
The biological parents of Baby Gabriel,
Posted on 8/19/26 at 1:02 pm to Night Vision
quote:
Nasheen Gilkar and Omar Ahmed
Very likely just wanted that baby as a plaything.
Posted on 8/19/26 at 1:05 pm to Bestbank Tiger
quote:
They respect it so much they're suing?
Yeah, that makes no sense at all.
If they want their money back, then just give to them and be done with them. Sick fricks.
Posted on 8/19/26 at 1:07 pm to Godfather1
quote:
Very likely just wanted that baby as a plaything.
Wouldn't be the first set of pervs to buy a baby for nefarious purposes.
We need to outlaw the sale of humans in this country, it's disgusting and horribly bad for the children.
Posted on 8/19/26 at 1:10 pm to Night Vision
It seems the whole idea of surrogate parenting really opens the possibility of all these complications; legally. I know it’s none of my business but I’m not shocked at all something like this would come up.
Posted on 8/19/26 at 1:10 pm to Night Vision
This is what happens when you start trying to play God.
Posted on 8/19/26 at 1:11 pm to Night Vision
quote:Because I guarantee they will only do the bare minimum that they’re legally required to and do everything they can to make that baby pass. And they don’t want the scrutiny. frick them.
Budner added: “This is the last update on Rumi’s health that his family intends to share. His condition remains critical and complex, and his family seeks privacy in caring for their son on his long road to recovery.”
Posted on 8/19/26 at 1:13 pm to Night Vision
It is what it is. I am very happy she was able to save the life of this child. But there will always be those who feel a defect, such as hypoplastic left heart syndrome, a life-threatening congenital condition, will simply be passed on to lineage of the child.
It is why docs always want to know if your relatives had certain conditions.
It is why docs always want to know if your relatives had certain conditions.
Posted on 8/19/26 at 1:13 pm to Night Vision
democrats have become pure evil
Posted on 8/19/26 at 1:16 pm to Night Vision
I guess I'm conflicted on this. Are they suing because she doesn't want to abort, or are they suing to collect on money they already paid her?
If it's to collect on money they already paid her, I can understand where they're coming from. I still think they're despicable for not wanting the baby, but seeking repayment of moneys already provided to her at least makes sense from a contract standpoint.
If it's to collect on money they already paid her, I can understand where they're coming from. I still think they're despicable for not wanting the baby, but seeking repayment of moneys already provided to her at least makes sense from a contract standpoint.
Posted on 8/19/26 at 1:19 pm to Night Vision
quote:
The couple had agreed to pay West $60,000 to carry their child under a contract that included an abortion clause allowing them to end Gabriel’s life if there were issues with the baby.
Fire and brimstone time Lord. Find mercy on those you want, obliterate the rest.
Posted on 8/19/26 at 1:27 pm to Night Vision
"...as Rumi’s parents continue to focus on his health and safety above all else.”
Uh... how does that sync with repeatedly pressuring the surrogate to abort him?!
Uh... how does that sync with repeatedly pressuring the surrogate to abort him?!
Popular
Back to top


28












