- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Would You Support Facial Recognition Technology in Your City if...
Posted on 11/11/22 at 2:43 pm to Jergan Jensen
Posted on 11/11/22 at 2:43 pm to Jergan Jensen
I suppose the fear is being incorrectly identified as a criminal. I would think that would be a rare occurrence and fairly easy to disprove. I’d definitely consider it to get criminals off the street.
1
Posted on 11/11/22 at 2:50 pm to Jergan Jensen
Local governments would use facial recognition as a fund raiser, the same way they use traffic light and speed cameras now.
Posted on 11/11/22 at 2:50 pm to Cycledude
You’d throw your freedom away to be “safe” smh
Posted on 11/11/22 at 2:51 pm to Jergan Jensen
quote:
Would You Support Facial Recognition Technology in Your City if...
as if we need technology to identify criminals.
Posted on 11/11/22 at 3:01 pm to Chad504boy
The fact that this is being discussed means it's already happening.
Posted on 11/11/22 at 3:23 pm to Jergan Jensen
I have used Clearview AI and other facial recognition programs. I am curious as to why people are saying "no" to this question and not giving a reason or explanation why. Also, "because its a slippery slope" does not answer the question.
Posted on 11/11/22 at 7:29 pm to Roy Curado
quote:
I have used Clearview AI and other facial recognition programs. I am curious as to why people are saying "no" to this question and not giving a reason or explanation why. Also, "because its a slippery slope" does not answer the question.
The reason comes down to no one having trust in our institutions, be it local or federal government or ABC agencies, to not use this technology against them. Given recent events, I think it’s a well-founded concern.
In a world where our government was run by people who had America’s best interest at heart, I think facial recognition tech is a no-brainer.
Posted on 11/11/22 at 7:30 pm to Jergan Jensen
quote:
Would You Support Facial Recognition Technology in Your City if...
No
Posted on 11/11/22 at 7:32 pm to Jergan Jensen
No, but I did like the show Person of Interest
Posted on 11/11/22 at 7:33 pm to Jergan Jensen
Posted on 11/11/22 at 7:38 pm to calcotron
They are already using this shite in NOLA. Did no one hear read the news stories earlier this year when NOPD denied "having" this tech and then got caught using it and said "well it belongs to LSP, we were just using it."
Also, there are people claiming it doesn't work as well on black people so it is racist. Which will doom it for sure.
Also, there are people claiming it doesn't work as well on black people so it is racist. Which will doom it for sure.
Posted on 11/11/22 at 7:47 pm to Jergan Jensen
It would prob end up being racist and identify a black man for a crime he didn’t commit.
Posted on 11/11/22 at 7:49 pm to Roy Curado
quote:
have used Clearview AI and other facial recognition programs. I am curious as to why people are saying "no" to this question and not giving a reason or explanation why. Also, "because its a slippery slope" does not answer the question.
What would be the reason for it?
And you can’t say crime, they aren’t prosecuting in big cities as it is.
Posted on 11/11/22 at 8:16 pm to Jergan Jensen
quote:
substantially help law enforcement identify criminals and reduce crime as a result?
Cops don't reduce crime... DA's reduce crime when they do thier jobs.
Either way no.
Posted on 11/11/22 at 8:24 pm to Jergan Jensen
No
Posted on 11/11/22 at 8:24 pm to Jergan Jensen
I hope downvote means NO because that's what I f'king did.
And the government federal, state, and local would abuse the hell out of it.
And the government federal, state, and local would abuse the hell out of it.
This post was edited on 11/11/22 at 8:29 pm
Posted on 11/11/22 at 8:30 pm to Jergan Jensen
Not no.
HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Give the bastards a millimeter, and they will try to take 1000 miles.
frick a surveillance state.
HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Give the bastards a millimeter, and they will try to take 1000 miles.
frick a surveillance state.
Posted on 11/11/22 at 8:33 pm to calcotron
What are we voluntarily giving up right now with smart devices and cameras in so many homes now? Everyone agrees to the long list of terms when they install and use these devices. A device/camera in a public setting seems less worrisome.
Posted on 11/11/22 at 8:41 pm to Jergan Jensen
ABSOLUTELY NOT. As fricked up as this country is right now, this isn’t China. We may get there with the government we have now.
Posted on 11/11/22 at 8:55 pm to Jergan Jensen
..
This post was edited on 11/22/22 at 10:10 am
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News