- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why are gay men so depraved?
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The "Ken and Barbie Killers".
ngl, that's a dreamy couple right there
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:37 pm to HoustonGumbeauxGuy
quote:Reading about your new tattoo grossed me out more jk
Why would you bring this disgusting arse story to the OT?
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:38 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
What do you disagree with?
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:40 pm to wesfau
quote:
Hmmmmm.
There is nature, and there is what is culturally or sociologically normal.
It's natural (in a sense) for people exposed to the same stimuli to need more extreme versions of the same to get the same reaction/response.
It's worth discussing on a sociological level how these things come to be.
But we can have those discussions without normalizing the behavior.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:41 pm to moneyg
quote:
You aren’t taking the field if you limit the choices to those two options.
Who is replacing them in your hypothetical, and why aren't those people adopting kids today? You do know there are thousands and thousands of kids in some form of state custody begging to be adopted, right?
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:44 pm to SuperSaint
I mean, I'm no Jennifer Coolidge, but dammit, I'm trying.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:45 pm to moneyg
quote:
Society would undoubtedly be better off if we did not allow gays to be parents. More often than not, the adopted children would be better off as well (not always).
You’re probably right. Society would be far better off if the pool of well qualified and vetted adults, willing and able to raise the fruit of another’s loins, were smaller.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:45 pm to RaoulDuke504
that's disturbing. You need to watch less news if this is news to you. Blech..
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:46 pm to moneyg
quote:
What do you disagree with?
Short answer: The idea that it's a good use of time to try and have a thoughtful discussion that involves you.
Longer answer: Acknowledging how American gay culture arose and how it contributed to the debauched nature of it now is not an excuse for said culture. When I talk about this stuff, I assume I'm talking about it with people largely like minded who can sort through the history and realities of a given thing without jumping to media-like talking points that I'm implying acceptance or tolerance for "underage stuff."
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:48 pm to RaoulDuke504
They always be making it look so tempting.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:48 pm to Funky Tide 8
quote:
Are gay men the only demographic who do disgusting stuff like that?
No. I've done some pretty damn depraved sh*t with women
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Who is replacing them in your hypothetical
so you are capable of defining “the field” in a very restrictive way, but incapable of actually understanding it when not being restrictive? The field involves all of the potential non-gay married adoptive parent ls that exist today.
Do you think gays represent a massive number of adoptive parents that couldn’t be filled from the non-gay population?
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Who is replacing them in your hypothetical, and why aren't those people adopting kids today? You do know there are thousands and thousands of kids in some form of state custody begging to be adopted, right?
Do we have any useful data on this for this conversation? When I see gay couples adopting, they're adopting babies. Or they're doing IVF with surrogates. I don't see them adopting 8 year old minority boys with behavioral issues.
Which means they're competing in the same space (anecdotally at least) as countless traditional couples - ie, trying to adopt young children.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:52 pm to RaoulDuke504
quote:
30% of gay men have over 1000 sexual partners that’s considered normal for them
97% of statistics are made up
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:53 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
I don't see them adopting 8 year old minority boys with behavioral issues.
Yeah, almost nobody does. Though I did read once that gays are like 2-3x more likely to try fostering. Don’t care enough to chase the link.
Most people that want to be parents want to nurture and raise them from as young as possible.
That said, I live in an urban setting and a lot of gay families live in my area. They’ve all adopted non white babies except one. They assimilate well and aren’t overly abnormal kids.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:56 pm to Glorious
quote:Exactly. When your entire psyche and public persona revolves around your bedroom debauchery and fetishes, and you insist your perversions be publicly lauded, you're not fighting for rights, you're fighting for abandonment of polite society. The absurdity of asking someone if they, "support" homosexuality is lost upon the average NPC walking around today: What do you mean, do I "support" gay sex? I "support" being good stewards of the land. I "support" puppies not being thrown into a dog fighting ring and bringing manufacturing back to America. I've no proclivity to "support" a man sticking his penis into another man's butthole, or any hole for that matter. That doesn't even make sense to ask me to "support" that.
Even without that, there is absolutely a pattern of informing the public exactly what their fetish is. You don’t see me advertising my penchant for interracial midget sadism (hypothetically)
And I love how someone mentioned Diddy as an equivalent to heterosexuals having the same depravity. Talk about a self-own: the entire context of his shocking truth being told is how intertwined the elite are with power and greed and their serial affinity with pedophilia and gay sex perversions. The entire pop culture complex is a debased, and Diddy is exhibit A. The shock value isn't because he wanted his girlfriend to sleep with another man in front of him, or him ejaculating onto her face after having vacation sex while the kids stay at grandma's, it's because he and other "masculine" rappers, athletes and politicians were screwing each other in the butt and raping children.
As the youngsters like to say, "they (gay depravity) not like us."
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:58 pm to Pettifogger
quote:2 gay guys operate a few businesses in my building and they did this, but more like 4 than 8. 2 of them.
I don't see them adopting 8 year old minority boys with behavioral issues.
Just FWIW
quote:
Which means they're competing in the same space (anecdotally at least) as countless traditional couples - ie, trying to adopt young children.
Those are the cream of the crop, for sure, but not the only children who get adopted, or else we'd have exponentially more in the system. A very tiny portion of kids in state custody are newborns. Someone is adopting a solid % of the rest. That was the hypo first proposed.
But my point still remains. If there was this huge population of people who would be adopting but-for gays, why aren't they adopting kids today?
Posted on 6/2/25 at 12:59 pm to moneyg
quote:
The field involves all of the potential non-gay married adoptive parent ls that exist today.
Who aren't adopting these kids today.
quote:
Do you think gays represent a massive number of adoptive parents that couldn’t be filled from the non-gay population?
No, but my question still remains. This putative class can adopt today, in addition to gays adopting. Why aren't they?
Posted on 6/2/25 at 1:07 pm to RaoulDuke504
You really have to ask this question?
Popular
Back to top


0







