- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
West Memphis 3.....33rd anniversary
Posted on 5/5/26 at 6:31 pm
Posted on 5/5/26 at 6:31 pm
Today, May 5th, is the 33rd anniversary of the West Memphis 3 case from 1993. That's the date that the 3 young boys went missing.
I was living in Jonesboro, AR at the time and during the Echols/Baldwin trial. Very interesting time. I also attended the opening night of "Paradise Lost" when it screened at The Malco theater in town.
I've vacillated several times as to who the true killers are. At this point, after listening to the "Truth & Justice with Bob Ruff" podcast, which is BY FAR the deepest investigation I've seen on the case.....I'm in the camp that the real killer(s) is still out there, if not dead in the ground.
But, it wasn't Echols, Baldwin, and/or Misskelley.
I was living in Jonesboro, AR at the time and during the Echols/Baldwin trial. Very interesting time. I also attended the opening night of "Paradise Lost" when it screened at The Malco theater in town.
I've vacillated several times as to who the true killers are. At this point, after listening to the "Truth & Justice with Bob Ruff" podcast, which is BY FAR the deepest investigation I've seen on the case.....I'm in the camp that the real killer(s) is still out there, if not dead in the ground.
But, it wasn't Echols, Baldwin, and/or Misskelley.
This post was edited on 5/5/26 at 9:28 pm
Posted on 5/5/26 at 6:32 pm to KCRoyalBlue
quote:
But, it wasn't Echols, Baldwin, and/or Misskelley.
This still triggers some posters
Posted on 5/5/26 at 6:34 pm to KCRoyalBlue
I don’t think there was a Satanic aspect to the killings, but I still think they were guilty.
Posted on 5/5/26 at 6:59 pm to KCRoyalBlue
I think it was one of the dozens of serial killer truckers that operated in the US in those days. Probably more than dozens. Sad story.
Posted on 5/5/26 at 7:01 pm to UFFan
quote:
I still think they were guilty
Posted on 5/5/26 at 7:02 pm to KCRoyalBlue
This case always intrigues me
Posted on 5/5/26 at 7:02 pm to KCRoyalBlue
quote:
I've vacillated several times
Gross.

Posted on 5/5/26 at 7:03 pm to KCRoyalBlue
I've watched every doc, read a few articles/blogs/etc., watched a few YouTube videos... I still don't know what I think happened there. Every theory has a solid rebuttal.
Posted on 5/5/26 at 7:11 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
Paradise Lost is one of the best documentaries out there
Posted on 5/5/26 at 7:25 pm to Yesca11
Has anyone else listened to the "Truth & Justice with Bob Ruff" podcast? It's from 2017-2018 and covers the case in extreme detail over the course about 65-70 episodes. It's NOT a cursory 1-2 hour "deep dive" as most podcasts are on cases.
You hear quite a bit of actual recorded court testimony, the Misskelley "confession", etc etc etc. The host went to West Memphis approximately 15-20 times to investigate the crime scene and interview those around the case.
I'm not quite done with the podcast yet, but getting there. Highly, highly recommended. Lots of info not covered in the 3 documentaries or any other place.
You hear quite a bit of actual recorded court testimony, the Misskelley "confession", etc etc etc. The host went to West Memphis approximately 15-20 times to investigate the crime scene and interview those around the case.
I'm not quite done with the podcast yet, but getting there. Highly, highly recommended. Lots of info not covered in the 3 documentaries or any other place.
This post was edited on 5/5/26 at 7:26 pm
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:03 pm to KCRoyalBlue
I read the book Devil's Knot by Mara Leveritt. I do not think they convicted the real killers. I believe they were convicted in what was literally a modern day witch hunt. My money is on the stepfather of the kid who was castrated.
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:13 pm to UFFan
quote:
I don’t think there was a Satanic aspect to the killings, but I still think they were guilty.
Then you are a fricking moron. They were literally exonerated by DNA evidence. Meanwhile, a hair belonging to the known abuser stepfather Terry Hobbs was found in the ligature. He’s guilty as hell.
This post was edited on 5/5/26 at 8:19 pm
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:But, it wasn't Echols, Baldwin, and/or Misskelley. This still triggers some posters
Truth. It was a a huge victory for the cause of science, logic and rationalism over fear, superstition, and willful ignorance. Needless to say it still drives plenty of posters here crazy that justice prevailed in the end.
This post was edited on 5/5/26 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:25 pm to REG861
I always thought to get the three kids to cooperate you needed an authority figure they recognized, ie a parent.
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:35 pm to Missouri Waltz
quote:
of the kid who was castrated.
not that one. all though, if you had to suspect one off the bat due to behavior, it'd be that one.
Terry Hobbs the step father of Steven Branch is the most likely person along with his buddy.
I still think Miskelley had some level of involvement or knowledge. He didn't just confess one time after being up for 2 days. He confessed to everyone and anyone that would listen.
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:47 pm to KCRoyalBlue
I guess they never did figure out who stumbled into the Dixie queen bathroom that left blood all over. It seems that would have been related, but maybe not.
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:53 pm to Rebel
Listen carefully to the actual tape-recorded confession from Misskelley.
People who feel he is guilty point to him describing what happened to the victims. However, the West Memphis police testified that they showed Jessie a morgue photo of one of the boys. He then preceded to confess based on exactly what he saw in that photo. Continue listening to the recorded confession and you will NOT find a single detail recounted by Misskelley that wasn't already fed to him, on tape, by the police. He gave ZERO ACCURATE details in that entire confession that he provided on his own. He only spoke on what he saw in the grisly picture and by what the police told him just moments prior on tape. Most of his dialogue is him agreeing by saying, "Yea", "Yes", "Mmmhmm", etc. He was a mentally slow person that simply wanted to please the authorities by agreeing, so he would be released.
Now, people will point to the fact that the police spoke to him at length prior to turning on the recorder. However, the police notes do not offer a single time that he provided evidence in that unrecorded conversation.
His "Bible" confession to attorney Dan Stidham after the conviction was based on everything that he had just heard in court. Furthermore, buried in that confession is actually his alibi, and he didn't even realize it. He was actually involved in an incident around the critical time the kids went missing. Police records document the incident. However, the authorities claim Misskelley wasn't on scene, yet there are a half-dozen witnesses who corroborate that he was indeed present.
It's sad for the 3 victims. It's sad for the 3 convicted. It's sad for all of those involved.
People who feel he is guilty point to him describing what happened to the victims. However, the West Memphis police testified that they showed Jessie a morgue photo of one of the boys. He then preceded to confess based on exactly what he saw in that photo. Continue listening to the recorded confession and you will NOT find a single detail recounted by Misskelley that wasn't already fed to him, on tape, by the police. He gave ZERO ACCURATE details in that entire confession that he provided on his own. He only spoke on what he saw in the grisly picture and by what the police told him just moments prior on tape. Most of his dialogue is him agreeing by saying, "Yea", "Yes", "Mmmhmm", etc. He was a mentally slow person that simply wanted to please the authorities by agreeing, so he would be released.
Now, people will point to the fact that the police spoke to him at length prior to turning on the recorder. However, the police notes do not offer a single time that he provided evidence in that unrecorded conversation.
His "Bible" confession to attorney Dan Stidham after the conviction was based on everything that he had just heard in court. Furthermore, buried in that confession is actually his alibi, and he didn't even realize it. He was actually involved in an incident around the critical time the kids went missing. Police records document the incident. However, the authorities claim Misskelley wasn't on scene, yet there are a half-dozen witnesses who corroborate that he was indeed present.
It's sad for the 3 victims. It's sad for the 3 convicted. It's sad for all of those involved.
Posted on 5/5/26 at 8:59 pm to Demonbengal
The "Mr. Bojangles" person was more than likely a drug-addled man who wandered into the restaurant with no connection to the case. Crack was rampant in WM during that era.
The route from the crime scene to the restaurant is not an easy route on foot.
Apparently WM police got around to getting sunglasses and possible blood samples left by the person, but they were, of course, misplaced and apparently never tested.
Honestly, well just never know if it was related to the case.
The route from the crime scene to the restaurant is not an easy route on foot.
Apparently WM police got around to getting sunglasses and possible blood samples left by the person, but they were, of course, misplaced and apparently never tested.
Honestly, well just never know if it was related to the case.
Posted on 5/5/26 at 9:40 pm to REG861
quote:
abuser stepfather Terry Hobbs
I thought this was the current accepted belief. I didn't realize there were still other theories floating out there.
Posted on 5/5/26 at 9:57 pm to TigerBaitOohHaHa
I will say that I thought they were guilty for a long time. One things that supports their lack of guilt is their lack of recidivism. Human nature is such that you commit that type of crime for one of two reasons: 1) hate that turns into gage ; 2) true predatory behavior. Regardless, both will repeat the behavior bc they cat control the rage or urge to predate or a weaker victim. Here , NONE of the three have committed any know subsequent acts of a violent nature. They are either an extreme anomaly or innocent.
Popular
Back to top

8












