Favorite team:Arkansas State 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:2241
Registered on:11/20/2020
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Allow any current foreigners to be grandfathered in.

Do I like that compromise? HELL NO.

But, I'd like to see them weasle out of voting "Yes" with that offer.
quote:

Nostalgia bait fads that will pass once the novelty wears off.

Millennials LOVE nostalgia like no other generation


You're the biggest Debbie Downer on this site. I'm sure you don't care, but most of us can recognize one of your posts without even looking at the author.

You project your misery on others. You're contrarian on every subject. Feels like a lil kid who claims to hate everything one loves, just to attract attention by going against the grain.

You're absolutely the definition of a turd in the punch bowl.

TD is the punch bowl.
Yea, CNN sux, but....

She has to say she made a mistake. And don't shoot the messenger.

Discuss.
College football IS dead. You just don't know it yet.
Very good analogy. I'm ready to see $5.xxs again.
Not guilty. Wait. What was the question?

Yes, he's a HoF'er.
The podcast lays out the geography of the crime scene in relation to the Bojangles restaurant and dissects the unliklyhood that an offender would have gone there of all places. It's a bit further on foot and out of the way than most assume.

They also play the court testimony of the restaurant manager and all his statements to police showing there were inconsistencies.

For example, he said the man was dirty, covered in blood, and had soiled himself. But, he never said he was "wet and muddy" as the real offender would assuredly be after climbing out of the ditch where the boys were drowned.

The "wet and muddy" angle probably came from the police or possibly even media.

As is, the cop who showed up that night came thru the restaurant DRIVE-THRU and never entered the building. Other police showed up a few days later, after the bathroom had been cleaned, to pursue the lead.

The manager didn't know about the boys that night, so he was just trying to do his job by cleaning. He did keep the man's sunglasses, but the police promptly misplaced them along with any other swabs they took.
Care to present your evidence?

re: I got a dilemma

Posted by KCRoyalBlue on 5/6/26 at 12:50 am to
Sometimes you just gotta make a grilled cheese sandwich and beat your meat in front of the ole lady.

Just so she's knows that she's expendable.

Godspeed, OP.
I would like to see any of those guys in the league go to work with my Dad as a carpenter and make $300/week in the sweltering heat and blistering cold. (Back in the day)

Dad would have put their dicks in the dirt and then shown them what it was like to go do carpentry jobs on the side AFTER his day-job was over.

Still the toughest man I've ever known. And I never saw him take a "load management" day.

frick the NBA.
quote:

I will say that I thought they were guilty for a long time. One things that supports their lack of guilt is their lack of recidivism. Human nature is such that you commit that type of crime for one of two reasons: 1) hate that turns into gage ; 2) true predatory behavior. Regardless, both will repeat the behavior bc they cat control the rage or urge to predate or a weaker victim. Here , NONE of the three have committed any know subsequent acts of a violent nature. They are either an extreme anomaly or innocent.


Very good point. I believe Echols has written a book or two. Studies crystals, healing thru magick, mysticism, or the like. No run-ins with the law.

Baldwin has founded/helped out with innocence projects for other alleged wrongfully convicted people. No run-ins with the law.

Misskelley does construction and generally keeps the lowest of profiles by staying close to family. He did get pulled over for driving without a license, I believe, but nothing came of it.

They don't seem like people who have had problems with discipline or failure to control urges since being released.
The "Mr. Bojangles" person was more than likely a drug-addled man who wandered into the restaurant with no connection to the case. Crack was rampant in WM during that era.

The route from the crime scene to the restaurant is not an easy route on foot.

Apparently WM police got around to getting sunglasses and possible blood samples left by the person, but they were, of course, misplaced and apparently never tested.

Honestly, well just never know if it was related to the case.
Listen carefully to the actual tape-recorded confession from Misskelley.

People who feel he is guilty point to him describing what happened to the victims. However, the West Memphis police testified that they showed Jessie a morgue photo of one of the boys. He then preceded to confess based on exactly what he saw in that photo. Continue listening to the recorded confession and you will NOT find a single detail recounted by Misskelley that wasn't already fed to him, on tape, by the police. He gave ZERO ACCURATE details in that entire confession that he provided on his own. He only spoke on what he saw in the grisly picture and by what the police told him just moments prior on tape. Most of his dialogue is him agreeing by saying, "Yea", "Yes", "Mmmhmm", etc. He was a mentally slow person that simply wanted to please the authorities by agreeing, so he would be released.

Now, people will point to the fact that the police spoke to him at length prior to turning on the recorder. However, the police notes do not offer a single time that he provided evidence in that unrecorded conversation.

His "Bible" confession to attorney Dan Stidham after the conviction was based on everything that he had just heard in court. Furthermore, buried in that confession is actually his alibi, and he didn't even realize it. He was actually involved in an incident around the critical time the kids went missing. Police records document the incident. However, the authorities claim Misskelley wasn't on scene, yet there are a half-dozen witnesses who corroborate that he was indeed present.

It's sad for the 3 victims. It's sad for the 3 convicted. It's sad for all of those involved.

re: Happy Cinco De Mayo (NSFW)

Posted by KCRoyalBlue on 5/5/26 at 7:27 pm to
I wholeheartedly apologize, as I only have one upvote to give.

OP doing the Lord's work and following forum rules.
Has anyone else listened to the "Truth & Justice with Bob Ruff" podcast? It's from 2017-2018 and covers the case in extreme detail over the course about 65-70 episodes. It's NOT a cursory 1-2 hour "deep dive" as most podcasts are on cases.

You hear quite a bit of actual recorded court testimony, the Misskelley "confession", etc etc etc. The host went to West Memphis approximately 15-20 times to investigate the crime scene and interview those around the case.

I'm not quite done with the podcast yet, but getting there. Highly, highly recommended. Lots of info not covered in the 3 documentaries or any other place.
Today, May 5th, is the 33rd anniversary of the West Memphis 3 case from 1993. That's the date that the 3 young boys went missing.

I was living in Jonesboro, AR at the time and during the Echols/Baldwin trial. Very interesting time. I also attended the opening night of "Paradise Lost" when it screened at The Malco theater in town.

I've vacillated several times as to who the true killers are. At this point, after listening to the "Truth & Justice with Bob Ruff" podcast, which is BY FAR the deepest investigation I've seen on the case.....I'm in the camp that the real killer(s) is still out there, if not dead in the ground.

But, it wasn't Echols, Baldwin, and/or Misskelley.
quote:

Little Tua just tore up his knee on a sack. Didn’t look good.


Better that, than tearing his sack up on a knee. That will NEVER look good.

Hiyoooooooo!!!