Started By
Message

re: Was this a justifiable shooting??? nsfw

Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:06 am to
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
39887 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:06 am to
Armed robbery of a bank less than 60 days ago. Out on the street.

I say this one ended extremely well.

Another 60 days on the street and there 100% be more victims of this dudes crime sprees.

All of Hamburg thanks these officers.

Posted by broadhead
Member since Oct 2014
2100 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:06 am to
quote:

I don’t like how cops can corner someone and then when that person tries to drive out of the corner, they automatically get killed for it. Those cops obviously were able to move out of the way of the truck. We jump from wanting to protect police officers to giving them blanket approval to kill people in response to a certain type of action, even if the specific action wasn’t life threatening to the officers. I’m not blaming these cops, I’m saying the protocol seems wrong. ETA: I expect all the downvotes but can someone respond in a logical manner without begging the question? I’ll be pleasantly surprised if anyone does.


He was caught in the middle of Grand Theft, was told to stop and get out. Then he attempted to drive off. What did you expect to police to do?
Posted by Pettifogger
Capitol Hill Autonomous Zone
Member since Feb 2012
79128 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:10 am to
quote:

I don’t like how cops can corner someone and then when that person tries to drive out of the corner, they automatically get killed for it.
Those cops obviously were able to move out of the way of the truck.

We jump from wanting to protect police officers to giving them blanket approval to kill people in response to a certain type of action, even if the specific action wasn’t life threatening to the officers.



I don't entirely disagree, although this isn't one of the more egregious ones I've seen.

The real problem is when some arguably non-violent criminal/suspect gets cornered and the police make the choice that they'll kill him rather than risk him getting away. I think that's my fundamental issue. Usually it's a mistake (they think he's capable of doing them harm), but it's still problematic IMO.

And before anyone gets all worked up, I agree you can just follow directions and live (most of the time). There have certainly been a few exceptions to that, however.
Posted by CrimsonTideMD
Member since Dec 2010
6925 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:10 am to
quote:

I don’t like how cops can corner someone and then when that person tries to drive out of the corner, they automatically get killed for it.
Those cops obviously were able to move out of the way of the truck.


What is the alternative?

Don't shoot and criminals know they can easily get away with their crimes?

Engage in a chase that could endanger the lives and property of innocent civilians?
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76213 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:14 am to
WHY didn’t THEY SHOOT THE TIRES AND HIS LEGS AND USE RUBBER BULLETS!!

This is why we kneel. This is why Betsy Ross Nike’s are racist.
Posted by Tchefuncte Tiger
Bat'n Rudge
Member since Oct 2004
57160 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:16 am to
That's got to be photo shopped.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:16 am to
quote:

What is the alternative?

Don't shoot and criminals know they can easily get away with their crimes?


That can’t be the justification. If it was, they’d be justified in killing anyone who was running away from them. Basically, all attempts to escape would be capital crimes, under the reasoning you gave.

quote:

Engage in a chase that could endanger the lives and property of innocent civilians?


That should depend on the situation and a balance of risk calculation. If it’s a murderer on a rampage, you’d have to give chase. If it’s a stolen car, it would depend.

I can hear the objections, saying that we can’t expect cops to make those difficult judgement calls, but what’s the alternative?

It seems that the alternative has become “when in doubt, pew pew pew”.
Posted by FatBoy62
Arkansas
Member since May 2018
672 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:16 am to
quote:

WHY didn’t THEY SHOOT THE TIRES AND HIS LEGS AND USE RUBBER BULLETS!!

This is why we kneel. This is why Betsy Ross Nike’s are racist.


I hope this is sarcasm or a troll. Otherwise move to a different country if you don't like our flag you fricking pansy.
Posted by Pandy Fackler
Member since Jun 2018
14012 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:18 am to
quote:

quote:
black guy



What does his race have to do with if it was justified or not? 



Because in this day and age, there is absolutely positively no justification for killing a black man while he's committing a crime.
This post was edited on 7/3/19 at 9:24 am
Posted by BatonScrewedTiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2017
186 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:37 am to
looks like a nice truck to slap some nuts on. Think I can get it for about 3-fiddy now?
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
113910 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:38 am to
quote:

gets gunned down stealing a vehicle in Little Rock a month later


Based on this piece of information... Yes, but I will have to read more of it.
Posted by Adam4848
LA
Member since Apr 2006
18942 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:50 am to
quote:

I expect all the downvotes but can someone respond in a logical manner without begging the question? I’ll be pleasantly surprised if anyone does.


Do you want that person to continue driving and then kill someone?
Posted by TheDeathValley
New Orleans, LA
Member since Sep 2010
17151 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Savage reportedly drove toward the officers in a pickup truck and they opened fire.


Drove in the general direction of is more like it, but if I had the possibility of being hit by a truck I would shoot too.
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15254 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 10:02 am to
I know the guy was a wanted criminal, so that makes me not feel sorry for him. But technically the lives of the police weren't in danger, from what I could see. The perp was trying to drive away from them, not into them. They basically shot him to avoid the hassles of getting into a big car chase.

My question is would this still be viewed aa justified if the guy didn't have his criminal history
Posted by tiddlesmcdiddles
Lafayette, LA
Member since Apr 2013
1719 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 11:09 am to
so are the cops supposed to assume the guy is unarmed and simply taking the truck to the carwash and returning it after?


Or is there more likely a chance that the perp was armed and would be willing to go to great lengths to avoid going back to jail at the expense other innocent lives?


its tough to digest because of how quickly the cops reacted and ended the situation. I don't think the cops deserve an attaboy but I cant really see how they were unjustified either.
Posted by dagrippa
Saigon
Member since Nov 2004
11286 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 11:14 am to
Tramon did not give a single f. It's like he was trying to get locked up or dead.
Posted by Fred's a tiger
Mamou
Member since Dec 2012
104 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 11:18 am to
So armed robbery is non-violent? When did this happen? How in hell did you determine that the deceased is a "non-violent criminal/suspect"?
Posted by Coach72
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2009
1426 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 11:20 am to
Love it - chalk one up for the good guys.

"Failure to comply"
Posted by BIGJLAW
Member since Mar 2013
8419 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 11:27 am to
quote:

I don’t like how cops can corner someone and then when that person tries to drive out of the corner, they automatically get killed for it.
Those cops obviously were able to move out of the way of the truck.

We jump from wanting to protect police officers to giving them blanket approval to kill people in response to a certain type of action, even if the specific action wasn’t life threatening to the officers.

I’m not blaming these cops, I’m saying the protocol seems wrong.

ETA: I expect all the downvotes but can someone respond in a logical manner without begging the question? I’ll be pleasantly surprised if anyone does.


First of all, it is easy to sit behind a keyboard and make assumptions, everyone can but until you have been in a situation where someone is attempting to harm you and everything is going 100MPH in your head, heart, etc people like you can make the assumptions. I am not PD but work with Federal, State, Local, etc and the main mission is to go home at the end of your shift.
Posted by kciDAtaE
Member since Apr 2017
15702 posts
Posted on 7/3/19 at 11:35 am to
quote:

You serious Clark?


Yes. You are seriously asking if a shooting is justified based off of someone’s race?

Are you suggesting that this shooting is justified bc he is black but if he were white or Asian, it would not be justified?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram