- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

UK sugar tax worked to cut sugar consumption by 50%; wants to implement more taxes
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:24 am
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:24 am
LINK
quote:
Children’s daily sugar consumption halved just a year after tax, study finds
quote:
The amount of sugar consumed by children from soft drinks in the UK halved within a year of the sugar tax being introduced, a study has found.
The tax, which came into force in April 2018, has been so successful in improving people’s diets that experts have said an expansion to cover other high sugar food and drink products is now a “no-brainer”
quote:
The research, published in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, looked at responses from 7,999 adults and 7,656 children between 2008 and 2019 to the annual nationally representative UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey. It showed that the daily sugar intake for children fell by about 4.8g, and for adults 10.9g, in the year after the levy’s introduction.
quote:
But despite this reduction, the amount of sugar consumed by adults and children still remains above the recommended guidelines and is contributing to high levels of tooth decay, obesity, diabetes and other illnesses.
quote:
Eddie Crouch, the chair of the British Dental Association, said that the sugar tax was delivering “tangible results” and was effective.
He added: “Extending it to the likes of cereals is a no-brainer for any government that cares about prevention. This needn’t add to the cost of living. Where voluntary action on reformulation has failed, the levy forces the food industry to do the right thing.”
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:26 am to StringedInstruments
US should do this. Or give incentives for healthy eating.
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:26 am to MikeD
quote:
US should do this.
response would be "Racist"
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:28 am to MikeD
Daddy gov you harder is want you want
Incentive is better option
Incentive is better option
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:28 am to MikeD
quote:
Or give incentives for healthy eating
Dawg, have you been to Academy to see the fatties buy their church clothes?
It’s almost like people are trying to be fat.
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:29 am to MikeD
Incentives are absolutely part of the problem. We made it very cheap to use engineered and artificial ingredients in our food. And these ingredients, like seed oils, are probably terrible for us.
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:29 am to StringedInstruments
I would be for more taxes on shitty foods, but I want these taxes to go into a fund(private company managed, not government). These funds would be used to pay for the medical care of all the poor who we currently have to treat for diabetes and heart disease.
This post was edited on 7/10/24 at 10:33 am
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:30 am to StringedInstruments
quote:bullshite. Unless the tax is really high, it will not reduce consumption by 50%.
UK sugar tax worked to cut sugar consumption by 50%
quote:Self-reporting? Yeah, it's bullshite.
The research, published in the Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, looked at responses from 7,999 adults and 7,656 children
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:30 am to StringedInstruments
"The government CAINT take my freedom away with no sugar tax," he shouted, as his health insurance premiums tripled to cover the increased heart surgeries and foot amputations for his fellow Americans
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:30 am to MikeD
quote:
US should do this. Or give incentives for healthy eating.
yep, prohibition worked wonders here............
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:34 am to MikeD
quote:
Or give incentives for healthy eating.
My health insurance premiums should be half as much as the morbidly obese person next to me in line at the grocery store.
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:35 am to StringedInstruments
I think instead of a tax we should be just regulating manufacturers to stop putting so much damn sugar in stuff. You could put half the sugar in a coke and it would taste the same.
Alas, Big Food has a large lobbying budget so nothing ever changes.
Alas, Big Food has a large lobbying budget so nothing ever changes.
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:36 am to MikeD
(no message)
This post was edited on 5/4/25 at 7:03 pm
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:36 am to MikeD
quote:
US should do this. Or give incentives for healthy eating.
I am not for the tax approach BUT if you are going to incentivize crops it shouldn't be cane and dent corn.
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:36 am to StringedInstruments
Feel like the last time they did something like this, they had a revolution on their hands.
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:36 am to StringedInstruments
quote:
British Dental Association

Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:37 am to StringedInstruments
One of the biggest issues with heart disease is sugar.
The sugar industry screwed up lots of people in this country
The sugar industry screwed up lots of people in this country
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:37 am to StringedInstruments
What about high fructose corn syrup?
Regular cane sugar isnt great for you but HFCS is way worse
Regular cane sugar isnt great for you but HFCS is way worse
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:37 am to StringedInstruments
always be suspicious of self report studies
Posted on 7/10/24 at 10:37 am to MikeD
quote:
US should do this.
they can't. Single moms would be screaming that their kids are dehydrated.
quote:
Or give incentives for healthy eating.
it blows my mind that obesity kills more in the US than malnutrition.
This post was edited on 7/10/24 at 10:39 am
Popular
Back to top
