- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The over representation of homosexuality
Posted on 8/18/22 at 9:35 am to Pandy Fackler
Posted on 8/18/22 at 9:35 am to Pandy Fackler
quote:It's really sad and quite telling that a scripted TV show could influence how people think and act (rather than real life situations).
I've always been indifferent to or sympathetic to gays but now? frick 'em. They annoy the shite out of me.
This is why we are bombarded 24/7/365 by propaganda...because it works on the weak-minded. It's called social engineering and it's alive and well in America.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 9:36 am to CharlesLSU
quote:
Watching Sandman on Netflix and they are hard pushing the homosexual relationship agenda in a big way.
While I agree with your overall sentiment, The Sandman was woke before woke was even a thing. If you went into it knowing the source material, and not saying you should have, you wouldn't be surprised.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 9:38 am to CharlesLSU
Agreed.
I'm not sure if there is an underlying leftist agenda associated with all of the overarching flavors of inclusiveness but what I do know is homosexuality should not be promoted as an alternative lifestyle (especially to children) because there is no doubt that impressionable young people are being influenced to experiment with homosexuality as a cool anti-establishment alternative.
And we have reached a grave state in our society when progressive parents are actually making gender choices for their children simply because for instance a boy demonstrates some feminine tendences at a young age.
I'm not sure if there is an underlying leftist agenda associated with all of the overarching flavors of inclusiveness but what I do know is homosexuality should not be promoted as an alternative lifestyle (especially to children) because there is no doubt that impressionable young people are being influenced to experiment with homosexuality as a cool anti-establishment alternative.
And we have reached a grave state in our society when progressive parents are actually making gender choices for their children simply because for instance a boy demonstrates some feminine tendences at a young age.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 9:40 am to Sabans straw hat

quote:
Rise of immorality is the decline of our nation
Who is immoral here? Gay people are born gay, i.e. "the people whom he hath chosen for his own inheritance."
Posted on 8/18/22 at 9:44 am to TX Tiger
I innately desire to do all sorts of things I don't do (or try not to do)
Posted on 8/18/22 at 9:44 am to jbird7
quote:
Was watching the Manti Te’o documentary last night and felt they were sympathetic to the guy who catfished him, who is now a transgender woman. Went into how he was struggling to find himself and how he found solace in American Somoa etc. I mean the guy nearly ruined Te’o’s career and they didn’t vilify that at all. It was abundantly clear the dude has a severe mental illness and was lying to people all over and bringing negative attention towards them. Was weird. But he’s transgender so we can’t vilify him and he was justified in doing what he did.
The whole point of the documentary was to let both Te’o and the catfisher tell their stories of what happened and how it affected them.
No one was vilified or glorified.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 9:51 am to TX Tiger
quote:
It's really sad and quite telling that a scripted TV show could influence how people think and act (rather than real life situations).
ahh, the “thin skin” retort. although somewhat valid, the expectations of who should have thicker skin don’t seem to apply to both sides of the political spectrum.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 9:52 am to Utah Tiger
quote:
I have been trying to figure out what the hell has been going on.
IMHO, it's a PsyOp project. The objective is to persuade the target audience.
It's been very successful, especially with the youth demographic. I'm sure that the designers of the project expected that youth would be especially receptive.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 9:52 am to Klark Kent
quote:Only you and those like you have to live up to the standards that are set.
ahh, the “thin skin” retort. although somewhat valid, the expectations of who should have thicker skin don’t seem to apply to both sides of the political spectrum.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 9:54 am to CharlesLSU
Netflix shoehorns homosexuals into damned near everything, including some children’s programs.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 10:03 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
And I honestly think the widespread availability of porn to young men, some of it quite vile, is a much bigger problem.
I agree but I’d stipulate it’s as big a problem.
By what standard do you judge pornography a problem and some of it vile yet claim homosexuality is not immoral and over representation of it in the Arts more or less benign?
Homosexual pornography is it benign or harmful do you think? Or only the vile parts?
With all due respect, it seems a measure of our society’s moral schizophrenia that someone can argue homosexuality is not immoral, overrepresentation of homosexuality in the Arts at worst irrelevant, and the radical militant homosexual agenda is not harmful to our culture and society, yet, can at the same time, clearly see and call out pornography’s harmful effects on our culture and society, especially its young men. Schizophrenic?
It shouldn’t then be surprising to find others arguing homosexuality immoral, over represented in the Arts, and the homosexual agenda a dire threat to society while arguing in the next breath pornography is a benign diversion and a “boys will be boys” passing fad. Schizophrenic?
Of course the Libertines and amoralists will not worry or care about any of it.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 10:12 am to CharlesLSU
It’s not just that they’re over representing homos in media, they also paint an unrealistic picture of them as well. They’re always portrayed as being in super-loving, long-term, monogamist relationships.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 10:21 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
they also paint an unrealistic picture of them as well.
They never seem to focus on the out of control instances of domestic violence in same sex relationships.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 10:21 am to Scruffy
correct.
if their children were to happen to stumble across, say the tale of Daniel in the Lion’s Den from the Bible. Well, that’s different ….and would have to removed, deleted, or at the minimum flagged as dangerous material for children. Instead of, as conservative parents are expected to do “change the channel”.
if their children were to happen to stumble across, say the tale of Daniel in the Lion’s Den from the Bible. Well, that’s different ….and would have to removed, deleted, or at the minimum flagged as dangerous material for children. Instead of, as conservative parents are expected to do “change the channel”.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 10:27 am to oogabooga68
quote:
They never seem to focus on the out of control instances of domestic violence in same sex relationships.
Most are not even in a committed relationship. If they want to portray homos in shows, at least show a realistic picture where instead of homos being the picture of traditional monogamy most of them go from one meaningless random hook-up to another.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 10:30 am to BruslyTiger
quote:
BruslyTiger
Don’t willingly be a fricktard.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 10:32 am to Darth_Vader
You make a good point. The only sort of Ozzie and Harriet or June and Ward Cleaver couples you will ever see in shows these days are now pretty much exclusively gay dude couples. 
Posted on 8/18/22 at 10:32 am to CharlesLSU
The Gays vs the Gay-nots should have a whine-off competition.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 10:40 am to boogedy
That moment you realize that you don’t understand sarcasm, but, damn, you really got triggered.
quote:
What kind of nonsensical narcissistic dribble is this? And one dude "OH my, I wish I could upvote this a thousand times". What a loser. LSUtoBoot, you and your ilk are not providing anyone with any kind of freaking service. Also, if someone is opposed to your lifestyle based on immorality then I doubt they are out having orgies. You are right about one thing, your lifestyle is grotesque.
Posted on 8/18/22 at 10:40 am to Froman
quote:
CharlesLSU
quote:
Froman

Popular
Back to top


1





