- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:20 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
Mx
How do you say this?
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:21 am to OysterPoBoy
quote:
quote:Mx How do you say this?
It's pronounced... shithead
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:21 am to Fun Bunch
Who could have guessed her marriage would not end with a death in 60 years?
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:21 am to OysterPoBoy
quote:
Mx
How do you say this?
we use that abbreviation for "maintenance" where I work
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:21 am to BottomlandBrew
quote:
I don't understand a goddam thing in those two paragraphs.
The violinist was in a "lavender marriage", which is when people of two different genders (male/female) get married but at least one of them is gay. So she is gay and her husband was not. But it sounds like they also had an open marriage, hence the "mistress" for the husband. And it was just a domestic partnership but not a legal marriage (so unsure of why it needed to be a divorce).
She is leaving him but is apparently cozy with his mistress so they celebrated together afterward?
That's the best I can do.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:22 am to Fun Bunch
This story will relate and be read by .0001% of the population. The rest of us will just look at it like Clint Eastwood looked at Koreans.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:23 am to Fun Bunch
I'll need remedial English to decipher this.
All I got out of it was some fiddle playing chic is divorcing someone.
Is this a throuple?
All I got out of it was some fiddle playing chic is divorcing someone.
Is this a throuple?
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:25 am to Hangit
quote:
Who could have guessed her marriage would not end with a death in 60 years?
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:25 am to Fun Bunch
I don't think I know what any of this means.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:26 am to Fun Bunch
I mean, if nothing else, this at least sounds vastly more cordial than most divorces I see
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:26 am to Fun Bunch
*** insert the "Flood it again" image with Jesus smoking a cigarette with concerned eyes ***
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:29 am to Fun Bunch
I got the first sentence and the last sentence, but I don't understand the rest of it.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:32 am to Fun Bunch
10 years ago this would have been absolute gibberish. Today it is accepted vernacular capable of being published in the failing NYT
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:33 am to Chicken
quote:
*** insert the "Flood it again" image with Jesus smoking a cigarette with concerned eyes ***
quote:
Chicken
You forgot to switch to your burner account baw
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:35 am to Fun Bunch
Is animal crossing like doing it doggy style
so you can both watch X-Files?
so you can both watch X-Files?
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:35 am to Fun Bunch
This is how you know we have it made.
What TRUE troubles do we really have?
Life is f*cking amazing if this is the shite people worry about .
What TRUE troubles do we really have?
Life is f*cking amazing if this is the shite people worry about .
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:38 am to Warfox
If you hold traditional family values and don't think this is strong and brave then you're a far right radical.
Sincerely,
Mainstream Media
Sincerely,
Mainstream Media
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:40 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
which was not a legal marriage,
Oh, so she was never married at all and this is all make believe
Posted on 10/6/25 at 10:40 am to Fun Bunch
quote:Seems like only the underlined forms of they are for sure being used for only one person which again doubles the confusion of trying to read anything pandering to the “theys”.
Before the breakup, Mx. Benson, 27, who uses the pronoun they, checked in with their therapist, who said a divorce would be a "good choice." Out of queer solidarity, they informed their husband's "mistress" — this was kosher in Mx. Benson's arrangement, which was not a legal marriage, but a domestic partnership — about their shared partner's troubling behavior.
Going back to the beginning of “they” for one confused person it was supposed to be temporary for a small amount of alphabets while a non-gender singular 3rd person pronoun form was decided on as most trans at the time wanted to use he or she based on identity choice with non-binary being much rarer, but true to alphabet’s narcissistic nature the attention received by being able to be outraged and becoming a victim when people wouldn’t or couldn’t adapt to using “they” forms for a single person pushed more alphabets to start using it to also get extra attention. In the ensuing race towards narcissistic victimhood mentality “they” became standard usage for most.
Does “Mx” mean person identifies as mexican??? And why use the term divorce when relationship “was not a legal marriage, but a domestic partnership”???
This post was edited on 10/6/25 at 10:47 am
Page 2 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News