Joshjrn

quote:

---

Clearly

---

And therefore, while you believe both are wrong, you think Powell is more correct than Trump, being you’re only separate from Powell by 1% and from Trump by 2%.

quote:

---

lol, is that a recent post by him? Three points would be a disaster for all the progress we've made on inflation. I agree that a little cut would be beneficial, but don't use a chainsaw when a scalpel is needed.

---

Looks like it was a Truth Social post from today at 9:08am:

LINK

Not "cool", "cooler than expected". They were expecting an increase of 0.2% and we had an increase of 0.1%. Now, any reason to panic? Of course not. Hell, I would say not even really a reason to be concerned. But, this report does seem to bolster Powell's position that maintaining a "wait and see" approach is currently better than either a rate increase or decrease.

In his defense, I just googled on my phone that exact search and the majority of returns are in fact from Yarn, but considering my previous results on this thread, I'm thinking Yarn might just have a bit of a niche for Burbs gifs :lol:

quote:

---

whatever. i'd never heard heard of yarn.io until like 2 weeks ago when google switched all of their results to this site.

but its not a google issue, thanks for that fresh take.

---

Just did a google image search for "laughing gif" and I don't see any results from Yarn. This sounds like it's more due to your browsing history or the type of gif you're looking for than anything Google is doing on their end.

quote:

---

That’s a little different than say someone should always have a passport on them.

---

If he meant it that way, yeah, that’s silly. I didn’t interpret his post that way. What he said was:

quote:

---

And everyone should have a passport at all times.

---

I interpreted that as having an active passport in some capacity and that could theoretically be overnighted to you in an emergency, not necessarily having it on you.

It’s kind of a sliding scale: the more active the channel owner is on TD in general and on the relevant board specifically, crossed with how relevant it is to an ongoing topic. In this case, unless your friend is extremely active on TD and Gaming, posting an independent thread for their content would likely be frowned upon pretty heavily.

quote:

---

I’m not the guy from the request- just a passerby laughing about your post Anyone looking for an AI class is likely the type that are in their complete infancy overwhelmed by where to get going

---

While his post is definitely over the top for a laymen, the core is accurate: if you don’t know how to use an LLM to Do X, ask said LLM “how can you help me Do X?” And it will likely give a good enough answer to start moving you in the right direction.

quote:

---

It's no different than having higher taxes on alcohol or cigarettes. We should tax things that ruin people at higher rates as a deterrent.

---

I still wouldn’t support it, but what you’re proposing would be to tax gambling winnings at higher rates than other forms of income. You still aren’t addressing that gamblers would be paying taxes even if they didn’t have any income because they lost as much as they won.

quote:

---

Why should this bother me?

---

It doesn’t strike you as a bit fricky that a gambler who breaks even for the year has to pay income taxes even though they made no income?