- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Teen Tased By Trooper On Girlfriend's Porch
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:02 am to WDE24
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:02 am to WDE24
quote:
in broad daylight? Let’s say it is probable cause to stop him. Once he was given a plausible explanation, it would have taken him a minute or two of restraint to find out if the kids was a criminal or not. He was under no threat and the use of force was absolutely unnecessary.
Exactly.
I never said I supported the dude getting tased. However, he certainly didnt help himself by just telling the trooper "frick you" right off the bat.
Just answer the troopers questions and say the gf will be outside in a minute to clear everything up.
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:02 am to Epic Cajun
quote:The cop doesn’t know. That guy could be the look out for terrorist firing a nuclear missile from inside your house. Shoot first and then figure it out. The cop might be in danger at some point if some highly improbable series of events might also be taking place.
I would hope that a cop wouldn't try to detain someone who is visiting me just because they are wearing black clothes.
This post was edited on 6/23/21 at 11:03 am
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:02 am to 777Tiger
quote:Honestly, this is more screwed up than the tasing.
The surveillance video of the arrest was not provided to or seen by the judge before initially appearing in court. Right now, Jack is still in jail where he’ll remain for 21 days.
Because of this cops mistake, this kid is in jail, even though there wasn't any illegal activity happening.
quote:
Brown was surprised the teen was only originally charged with the odd traffic charge and resisting arrest. There is a Florida statute that says you can detain someone under loitering and prowling to determine if their reason to be there is lawful.
A day after the original arrest, FHP added a loitering and prowling charge and updated that original narrative.
The trooper still arrested the kid even after the girlfriend comes out. I don't know if there's more to the story, but being arrested for resisting arrest should not be a thing.
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:02 am to Pettifogger
quote:
As a reminder to anyone just joining the thread, the incident here involved a dickhead teen trying to get his girlfriend to let him in. That might not be obvious from the above multiple rape and murder discussion.
Ok, I chuckled. Take your upvote and frick off
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:04 am to Saint Alfonzo
quote:
It's not a crime to go into the backyard of a friend's house. He had permission to be there.
Like I said above, I really hope one day some 6' "kid" sees a cop patrolling your neighborhood and then ducks into your backyard and then the cop does absof*ckinglutlely NOTHING.
And, if your wife and daughter just happened to get raped and murdered by this "poor innocent kid who was just texting" on private property that he may or may not have had permission to be on (the cop has no f*cking way of knowing), I want you to come back here and tell us all that you are completely satisfied that the cop acted appropriately because, AS FAR AS THE COP KNOWS, the "kid" had every right to act suspiciously, dress like your standard/typical home invader, and duck into your backyard when he saw the cop patrolling your neighborhood.
This post was edited on 6/23/21 at 11:11 am
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:05 am to MMauler
quote:
And, if your wife and daughter just happened to get raped and murdered by this "poor innocent kid who was just texting"
FFS how many rapes and murders occur in this hypothetical neighborhood
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:05 am to KamaCausey_LSU
quote:
The trooper still arrested the kid even after the girlfriend comes out. I don't know if there's more to the story, but being arrested for resisting arrest should not be a thing.
Standard operating procedure for law enforcement to tack on charges when they frick up. They then ride the ADA to get a conviction for "anything" to give them coverage for their behavior. I've never seen LEOs more angry in court than when an ADA dismisses a resisting case involving a situation in which they beat the shite out of someone.
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:05 am to MMauler
What I can tell from this thread, is that you are far more dangerous to a free and just society than the kid in this story.
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:05 am to KamaCausey_LSU
quote:
Jack is still in jail where he’ll remain for 21 days.
didn't get that part, based on what's in the video, he didn't physically resist, just didn't put his hands behind his back, what's the charge? and how could there be no bail for something this innocuous? if anything the cop should be charged
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:06 am to MMauler
quote:You are a fricking insane person. Do you really live your life in fear of the above scenario?
Like I said above, I really hope one day some 6' "kid" sees a cop patrolling your neighborhood and then ducks into your backyard and then does absof*ckinglutlely NOTHING.
And, if your wife and daughter just happened to get raped and murdered by this "poor innocent kid who was just texting" on private property that he may or may not have had permission to be on (the cop has no f*cking way of knowing), I want you to come back here and tell us all that you are completely satisfied that the cop acted appropriately because, AS FAR AS THE COP KNOWS, the "kid" have every right to act suspiciously, dress like your standard/typical home invader, and duck into your backyard when he saw the cop patrolling your neighborhood.
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:07 am to Box Geauxrilla
quote:Listen bootlicker, unless I'm breaking the law you can shove your commands up your arse.
He was given a direct command and ignored it.
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:07 am to Joshjrn
quote:
Standard operating procedure for law enforcement to tack on charges when they frick up. They then ride the ADA to get a conviction for "anything" to give them coverage for their behavior. I've never seen LEOs more angry in court than when an ADA dismisses a resisting case involving a situation in which they beat the shite out of someone.
*hits pedestrian with patrol car*
"add breaking and entering and destruction of property"
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:08 am to WDE24
quote:
Once he was given a plausible explanation, it would have taken him a minute or two of restraint to find out if the kids was a criminal or not.
That's EXACTLY what the f*ck he was trying to do -- and do it by using a NONLETHAL means.
quote:
He was under no threat and the use of force was absolutely unnecessary.
How in the f*ck do you know that? And, more importantly, how in the f*ck was the cop suppose to know that? How the cop suppose to know who this thug was texting and where they were? He was given a COMPLETELY F*CKING REASONABLE command that would have completely defused the situation. The girlfriend would have came outside and explained. Even then, the cop would have asked her to prove that she was the owner of the home and that they weren't accomplices.
This cop acted MORE THAN REASONABLY given the totality of the facts.
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:09 am to MMauler
quote:Bro are you angry that you’re short af?
Like I said above, I really hope one day some 6' "kid"
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:09 am to tigerfoot
You must be a crazy person
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:10 am to MMauler
quote:
That's EXACTLY what the f*ck he was trying to do -- and do it by using a NONLETHAL means.
What a way to figure out what people are doing
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:11 am to OweO
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/17/21 at 10:20 am
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:12 am to OweO
pretty sure that kid has some spinal issues after hitting that fire pit.
Posted on 6/23/21 at 11:12 am to MMauler
quote:Because it’s on video and plain as day.
How in the f*ck do you know that? And, more importantly, how in the f*ck was the cop suppose to know that?
quote:Texting isn’t a threat that justifies use of force regardless of how many ridiculous, implausible scenarios you think up. Cops can’t use force based on imaginary or unlikely unknowns.
How the cop suppose to know who this thug was texting and where they were?
Popular
Back to top


0










