- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: St Louis: Unarmed teen shot and killed by police, riot in progress.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:47 am to PuntBamaPunt
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:47 am to PuntBamaPunt
quote:
Tin soldiers and Nixon coming, We're finally on our own.
That's awesome
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:47 am to purplengold1
Very few news agencies reporting on the cop's injuries. If you remember after Zimmerman/trayvon, there were images released of Zimmerman's injuries. I wonder when we'll see those.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:48 am to diat150
quote:
is anyone not getting audio on the conference feed?
I have audio.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:48 am to ell_13
We will get to hear from Baden.... I'm sure he will give more detailed explanation of his report
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:48 am to purplengold1
quote:
Take this fwiw. I know a surgeon at the hospital that the police officer was taken to after the incident. He said that the officer's eyes were both extremely swollen and one of them was full of blood. He said that the officer could've been shooting blindly for a portion of the shots.
This is one of the next pieces of the puzzle - ala Zimmerman at some point pics will be released of the cop that day. If it is like you say above (big if), that would be a pretty significant fact to frame the event
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:48 am to purplengold1
quote:
Take this fwiw. I know a surgeon at the hospital that the police officer was taken to after the incident. He said that the officer's eyes were both extremely swollen and one of them was full of blood. He said that the officer could've been shooting blindly for a portion of the shots.
You know a surgeon in a hospital in Missouri?
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:48 am to SabiDojo
quote:
However, that determination could change it it turns out that there is gunshot residue on Mr. Browns clothing, to which Dr. Baden did not have access.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:48 am to purplengold1
quote:
Take this fwiw. I know a surgeon at the hospital that the police officer was taken to after the incident. He said that the officer's eyes were both extremely swollen and one of them was full of blood. He said that the officer could've been shooting blindly for a portion of the shots.
Certainly makes sense
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:49 am to Ignignot
quote:
so has the autopsy said which way the bullets that killed him entered?
4 in the right arm
2 to the head.
All from the front.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:49 am to TigerHam85
quote:
However, that determination could change it it turns out that there is gunshot residue on Mr. Browns clothing, to which Dr. Baden did not have access.
Most certainly, but I would presume if really close range head shots would leave residue on the head... but who knows.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:50 am to GetCocky11
Wow. This attorney seems really slow
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:50 am to purplengold1
quote:
Take this fwiw. I know a surgeon at the hospital that the police officer was taken to after the incident. He said that the officer's eyes were both extremely swollen and one of them was full of blood. He said that the officer could've been shooting blindly for a portion of the shots.
HIPAA violation. Sweet.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:50 am to the808bass
quote:
4 in the right arm
At least one of these came from within the vehicle as admitted by the officers.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:51 am to FelicianaTigerfan
quote:
Wow. This attorney seems really slow
He's gotta consort with, not consult with
This post was edited on 8/18/14 at 9:52 am
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:51 am to the808bass
quote:
HIPAA violation.
Correct.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:51 am to igoringa
quote:
Most certainly, but I would presume if really close range head shots would leave residue on the head... but who knows.
I don't know why residue is even important. It's used to prove close up shots and I don't think we've heard anyone claim he was within 5-10 feet have we? Maybe I'm missing this.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:51 am to igoringa
quote:
Most certainly, but I would presume if really close range head shots would leave residue on the head... but who knows.
He was wearing a hat, so that could explain why none was found.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:52 am to Lsut81
Maybe. We'll know for certain from blood stains on the vehicle or road. But you would have thought there would be residue on the skin had the shots been that close.
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:52 am to sparkinator
The guy talking at the press conference is a horrible speaker.
Popular
Back to top



0







