Started By
Message

re: St Louis: Unarmed teen shot and killed by police, riot in progress.

Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:38 am to
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128862 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:38 am to
When you say press conference at 9:30, start your press conference at 9:30. Right?
Posted by Langston
Member since Nov 2010
7685 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:38 am to
quote:

Yup, so I'm guessing that Brown turned to confront the officer, the officer fired the four shots that hit him in the arm, enraging Brown, and then he lunged/began running at the officer and the officer got off two shots while his head was in a downward angle... The eye shot and then the kill shot.


I dont buy this for a minute, just like I didn't buy the hands up or shot in the back. I think he was charging the whole time, based on the only two peoples versions of events I've heard that make sense.

ETA: the whole time meaning while he was shot.
This post was edited on 8/18/14 at 9:41 am
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85161 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:39 am to
Btw, anyone who is questioning the angle of the head....

Stand up and act as if you are about to lunge at someone or run at someone...

The first thing that happens is your back leg/plant leg extends out, your front leg bends, and your head naturally dips down. You can still have your eyes up to see where you are going, but there is no denying it changes the angle and would bring a 6'4 individual face/head down another 6+ inches.
Posted by igoringa
South Mississippi
Member since Jun 2007
12417 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:39 am to
quote:

I don't think his hands were up.


If up, the cop would have to be consistently missing high left and up... it just isn't plausible.
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:40 am to


quote:

Brown turned to confront the officer, the officer fired the four shots that hit him in the arm
Are you saying he shot him in the arm as a warning?
Posted by TigerHam85
59-024 Kamehameha Highway
Member since Nov 2009
31493 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:41 am to
quote:

lack of gun residue there was still a distance.


Boy you sure did leave out some vital information here.
Posted by Isabelle
Member since Jul 2012
2726 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:42 am to
That theory was pushed around after JFK was assassinated.
Posted by Langston
Member since Nov 2010
7685 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:42 am to
quote:

Btw, anyone who is questioning the angle of the head....


I'm not questioning anything from the autopsy. thats why it is done. I just didn't think your pic proved your point very well but I'm not sure I was following you.
Posted by schwag
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2014
301 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:42 am to
I know many have heard of the 21 foot rule. It takes very little for an agressor to accelerate 21 feet while someone is unholstering a weapon. (We dont know how far MB was when he allegedly started his "charge") I would imagine that the officer exited his car with weapon drawn. Shooting at a rapidly accelerating target, at that distance... Id say per the shot placement that it is entirely plausible that MB was charging head on at the officer and he rapid fired to neutralize the threat.
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84436 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:43 am to
quote:

That theory was pushed around after JFK was assassinated.



Wtf? Drink a cup of coffee.
Posted by FelicianaTigerfan
Comanche County
Member since Aug 2009
26059 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:43 am to
quote:

dont buy this for a minute, just like I didn't buy the hands up or shot in the back. I think he was charging the whole time, based on the only two peoples versions of events I've heard that make sense


This
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:44 am to
quote:


quote:

No gunpowder



It's because of this I might find the shooting questionable.



How?

Can we do a quick brush up on gunpowder residue to put this silliness to rest?

12 inches away leaves heavy residue.

18 inches to 24 inches leaves leaves considerable residue.

3 to 5 feet away leaves trace amounts.

Look at an object 6 or 7 feet away from you and ask yourself if shooting it would be "shooting it at a distance."

No. It wouldn't be.

You could shoot someone 6 feet away and they would not have residue. 6 feet away is right on top of you.

Idiots seem to think no gunpowder residue means he had to have shot him from 50 yards.

Geez.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85161 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:44 am to
quote:

Are you saying he shot him in the arm as a warning?


Im sorry, should have said 3 shots, because the 1st came from within the vehicle.

I'm saying Brown turned and became aggressive... Maybe 10 or so feet away from the officer, who was trailing him, and began walking towards the officer like "frick you, what the frick are you going to do" and the officer feared for his life being that he was already "punched" in the face (supposedly). He fired 3 shots which weren't effective or on target and then Brown lunged/charged at the officer and he fired the last two shots (eye and then head)
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128862 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:44 am to
quote:

the officer fired the four shots that hit him in the arm, enraging Brown, and then he lunged/began running at the officer

I don't like the way cops are policing our country currently and I find this far-fetched. The guy stops as the officer asked him to and them turns around. And the police officer plinks him four times?
Posted by Ignignot
Member since Mar 2009
18823 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:45 am to
so has the autopsy said which way the bullets that killed him entered?
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84436 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:45 am to
quote:

How?

Can we do a quick brush up on gunpowder residue to put this silliness to rest?

12 inches away leaves heavy residue.

18 inches to 24 inches leaves leaves considerable residue.

3 to 5 feet away leaves trace amounts.

Look at an object 6 or 7 feet away from you and ask yourself if shooting it would be "shooting it at a distance."

No. It wouldn't be.

You could shoot someone 6 feet away and they would not have residue. 6 feet away is right on top of you.

Idiots seem to think no gunpowder residue means he had to have shot him from 50 yards.

Geez.


I think you missed a vital word in my response. I'll help you.

quote:

might


Posted by purplengold1
Illinois
Member since Feb 2009
5759 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:45 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/18/14 at 9:53 am
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85161 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:46 am to
quote:

The guy stops as the officer asked him to and them turns around. And the police officer plinks him four times?


Read my followup post
Posted by TigerHam85
59-024 Kamehameha Highway
Member since Nov 2009
31493 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:46 am to
All bullets were fired into his front.
Posted by diat150
Louisiana
Member since Jun 2005
47823 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:47 am to
nm
This post was edited on 8/18/14 at 9:48 am
Jump to page
Page First 553 554 555 556 557 ... 826
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 555 of 826Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram