Started By
Message

re: St Louis: Unarmed teen shot and killed by police, riot in progress.

Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:52 am to
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
84436 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Wow. This attorney seems really slow



If he's speaking slowly, he probably knows his target audience.
Posted by Langston
Member since Nov 2010
7685 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:53 am to
quote:


Take this fwiw. I know a surgeon at the hospital that the police officer was taken to after the incident. He said that the officer's eyes were both extremely swollen and one of them was full of blood. He said that the officer could've been shooting blindly for a portion of the shots.



HIPAA violation. Sweet


HIPAA is a joke.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
97143 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:53 am to
quote:

there were reports of shooting at police, Molotov cocktails have been confirmed etc


As recently as last night as well.

Although I'm not a fan of MSNBC b/c they slant everything, they have pretty good coverage of it - even the presser at 1am last night.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85161 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:53 am to
quote:

It's used to prove close up shots and I don't think we've heard anyone claim he was within 5-10 feet have we? Maybe I'm missing this.


I don't think we've heard that... We know the final resting place was like 35ft from the car, but we don't know where the officer was standing at that point.

If the officer pursued, the officer could have only been 10ft away at time of secondary firing.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88029 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:54 am to
quote:

If the officer pursued
That was the story from the cop's friend
Posted by Tigerstudent08
Lakeview
Member since Apr 2007
5776 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:54 am to
I can't believe these clowns got hired again after the Trayvon case

How many times will he say unarmed teenager and in broad daylight?
Posted by Itismemc
LA
Member since Nov 2008
4794 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:55 am to
quote:

Take this fwiw. I know a surgeon at the hospital that the police officer was taken to after the incident. He said that the officer's eyes were both extremely swollen and one of them was full of blood. He said that the officer could've been shooting blindly for a portion of the shots.


Narrative Shift:

Cop Fires Blindly into Unarmed Person
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85161 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:55 am to
Holy shite... "back to front"


He must have watched JFK before this
Posted by Joe Blow
Member since Nov 2007
2640 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Holy shite... "back to front"

How could anyone not be in a state of "wat" after hearing that?
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88029 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Holy shite... "back to front"
I can't listen right now. Deets?
Posted by schwag
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2014
301 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:56 am to
The shot came from behind and exited the eye?
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85161 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:56 am to
Ok, what that lawyer just said doesn't match up to what the report supposedly said.

Have to hear from Baden.

Lawyer claiming theres and entry point on head above eye and exit at eye.
Posted by Aux Arc
SW Missouri
Member since Oct 2011
2184 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:57 am to
quote:

I'm not familiar with Missouri evidence law, but that's (the video) going to be tough to introduce.


It was taken in the moments just before the shooting. I think it comes in. But then, I do think there will be a prosecution.
Posted by uway
Member since Sep 2004
33109 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:57 am to
quote:

All bullets were fired into his front.


Is that true?
Did the officer only shoot 6 times?
Posted by Winkface
Member since Jul 2010
34377 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:57 am to
He never explained how the first one was determined to be "back to front." I'm confused.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
85161 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:57 am to
quote:

The shot came from behind and exited the eye?


I don't know that the frick the back to front was... But claiming his head was all the way down because he was surrendering.
Posted by TigerHam85
59-024 Kamehameha Highway
Member since Nov 2009
31493 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:59 am to
I'm reading it right now in the autopsy.
Posted by Ignignot
Member since Mar 2009
18823 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:59 am to
quote:

All bullets were fired into his front


interesting
Posted by Tigerstudent08
Lakeview
Member since Apr 2007
5776 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 9:59 am to
BACK TO FRONT!?!?!

This is the first idiot that I've seen that actually claimed based off the autopsy the bullet wounds came from behind

It shows the exact opposite!! Didn't the bullet get lodged in his neck?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128862 posts
Posted on 8/18/14 at 10:00 am to
quote:

HIPAA is a joke.

The fines and penalties are not. And any person found to have discussed the PHI in a high profile case like this outside of normal acceptable channels would likely be fired on the spot.
Jump to page
Page First 555 556 557 558 559 ... 826
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 557 of 826Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram