Started By
Message

re: So DA George Barnhill had the same video in possession since the day of the Arbery murder

Posted on 5/7/20 at 5:53 pm to
Posted by chryso
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
13132 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 5:53 pm to
quote:

except that he was literally just jogging in a neighborhood someone didn't think he belonged in because he was black

this wasn't citizens arrest it was two good ol' boys finally getting to live out their gun fetish dreams


And where is your source for this info?
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
68456 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 5:55 pm to
In the video, it looks like he’s just jogging before the truck ambushes him. Whether there’s more to it or not, I cannot imagine how any DA could watch that video and not immediately arrest the two shooters while they investigate the facts. They killed that dude.

Even if he had been robbing their houses, you can’t chase a burglar down, ambush him from behind, and kill him.
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 5:58 pm
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
49935 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

except that he was literally just jogging in a neighborhood someone didn't think he belonged in because he was black

this wasn't citizens arrest it was two good ol' boys finally getting to live out their gun fetish dreams


This type of speculation is just as bad as those that are defending the shooters.
Posted by SHOtime Tiger
Member since Aug 2019
1361 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 5:57 pm to
quote:



And where is your source for this info?


You got about 8,000 posts. You think if I spend the next 30 minutes looking through that history I might find a “clutcha” or “didn’t do nothing” post of yours before someone was convicted of a crime?
Posted by bigpetedatiga
Alexandria, LA
Member since Aug 2009
8712 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

And where is your source for this info?


Well there was a neighbor who was quoted as saying he jogs through the neighborhood and always waves to everyone.

Also, he was cleared of any wrong doing and even the crooked DA has admitted he was committing any crimes.
Posted by WaWaWeeWa
Member since Oct 2015
15714 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

i know you're talking hypotheticals but we need to be honest about it


quote:

except that he was literally just jogging in a neighborhood someone didn't think he belonged in because he was black


If you want to be honest he wasn’t just out for a jog. But it’s completely irrelevant what he did before that. He wasn’ta threat to anyone at the moment and no one deserves to have guns drawn on them by civilians.

It’s murder. Nothing more, nothing less.

And it was covered up not because of race, but because of this guys connections. Everyone involved needs to be prosecuted.
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 6:00 pm
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
68456 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 6:02 pm to
quote:

And it was covered up not because of race, but because of this guys connections. Everyone involved needs to be prosecuted.


This. I cannot even imagine a plausible set of circumstances that could make the shooters in this video not at least guilty of manslaughter.
Posted by Javzz
Member since Jan 2006
1595 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

This type of speculation is just as bad as those that are defending the shooters.


The speculation of those defending the shooters has led to two individuals that are obviously an endangerment to society to roam around scott-free for two months.
Posted by Antonio Moss
The South
Member since Mar 2006
48708 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 6:04 pm to
quote:

And it was covered up not because of race, but because of this guys connections.


I wouldn't go that far


quote:

Everyone involved needs to be prosecuted


I'm not sure there is a reasonable chain of events that could exonerate the local law enforcement here. DOJ needs to step in.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171903 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 6:04 pm to
Inexcusable. shite heads protecting their shite head former cop friends.
Posted by SHOtime Tiger
Member since Aug 2019
1361 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 6:07 pm to
quote:


I'm not sure there is a reasonable chain of events that could exonerate the local law enforcement here. DOJ needs to step in


Agree 100%. Time to start looking at emails & text messages sent on government issued cell phones and email addresses. If further investigation warrants, subpoena private phone logs and texts.
Posted by tketaco
Sunnyside, Houston
Member since Jan 2010
21159 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 6:12 pm to
quote:

So you can citizens arrest anyone you think fits the depiction when they're not in the act of committing a crime?


Think everyone is in their feelings on this.

I believe I was responding to someone saying "if he was", in which I said "so if he was infact a person who committed the crime then Citizens can detain him".

What I didn't say is (which is why I opened with "I wouldn't have gotten involved") "yeah man, be aggressive and corner the guy while armed and if he resist shoot his black arse".

I'm pretty confident I didn't say that but I guess look back at the transcript.
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 6:14 pm
Posted by RollTide1987
Augusta, GA
Member since Nov 2009
68325 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 6:16 pm to
I don't know too many of the facts of this case but, as far as I can tell, this video doesn't do anything to bolster one side or the other.
Posted by SHOtime Tiger
Member since Aug 2019
1361 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 6:18 pm to
quote:


I believe I was responding to someone saying "if he was", in which I said "so if he was infact a person who committed the crime then Citizens can detain him".


So where do you think the “if he was” factors into this particular story?
Posted by tketaco
Sunnyside, Houston
Member since Jan 2010
21159 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

I don't know too many of the facts of this case but, as far as I can tell, this video doesn't do anything to bolster one side or the other.


Racist

quote:

So where do you think the “if he was” factors into this particular story?


I think you're in the wrong board. I think Soccer Board is better suited for you or movie board.
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 6:21 pm
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19979 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 6:18 pm to
Here is the thing. Even if Arbery had robbed the home and was running away, these two men lost all legal protections when they left the house and gave chase and ultimately killed him. These fricks should be buried under the jail and any cops that covered it up should have a cell right beside them
Posted by Bigfishchoupique
Member since Jul 2017
9137 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 6:19 pm to
quote:

This. I cannot even imagine a plausible set of circumstances that could make the shooters in this video not at least guilty of manslaughter.



Go to HelmetHead’s FB page there is a letter from the DA that explains why he was not charging the shooters. Slick and slippery if you ask me.
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 6:20 pm
Posted by Golfer
Member since Nov 2005
75052 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 6:20 pm to
quote:

so what happened prior to?


Sounds like Arbery might have poked into a house that's under construction and the neighbors intervened.

I don't know his motives, but going through an "open house" during construction is something I've done a good bit on walks, etc.

LINK
This post was edited on 5/7/20 at 6:22 pm
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
15577 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 6:22 pm to
quote:

If you want to be honest he wasn’t just out for a jog.


What was he doing then? I haven’t seen anything other people saying “no way he was just jogging.”
Posted by SHOtime Tiger
Member since Aug 2019
1361 posts
Posted on 5/7/20 at 6:23 pm to
quote:

is video doesn't do anything to bolster one side or the other.


I don’t know man. Video of a guy running in the street, not possessing stolen property or weapons, confronted by 2 armed individuals and shot by them definitely leans one way.

There may be other evidence that can explain or refute the video, but saying the video considered a net gain of zero???

It doesn’t even “BOLSTER” one side?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram