- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Savannah Guthrie’s mom missing - being held for ransom - suspect photos released
Posted on 2/9/26 at 7:20 pm to Jake88
Posted on 2/9/26 at 7:20 pm to Jake88
quote:
So just invent some screwy theory because you're bored and you have a chance at a "I knew it! I knew it!"
What is wrong with you? All I've done is list factual statements about these people and how they're connected. I've provided neither "a screwy theory" nor any proclamation that I know something to be true.
What have YOU provided to this thread other than saying everyone else is wrong?
Posted on 2/9/26 at 7:28 pm to HouseMom
quote:I wonder what youre implying with this?
I've provided neither "a screwy theory"
quote:
The firm's goals were to provide "lobbying, public relations, advertising, marketing, government relations and policy counsel, crisis management and opinion research."
This firm was named directly in the Epstein files.
Not to mention, Savannah interviewed many Epstein survivors to include Virginia Giuffre, whose father worked at Mar-a-Lago. When Guiffre's case was unsealed, Jeffrey Epstein "committed suicide" the very next day. In April of 2025, Virginie Giuffre herself "committed suicide" and was coincidentally writing her memoir detailing her abuse. It was published posthumously this past October
And below, you are admitting to what I've said about you...
quote:
quote:
Just a little far fetched to think this could be related to Epstein or the Clintons.
I agree, but I love a good mystery/conspiracy.
quote:Pointing out your sensationalism and boredom that requires an Epstein conspiracy. I've commented on nobody else.
What have YOU provided to this thread other than saying everyone else is wrong?
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 7:30 pm
Posted on 2/9/26 at 7:32 pm to Lou Loomis
quote:
She was dead that night.
This is the only way it could be someone in the family. Whether during the kidnapping or soon after with her health and heart conditions.
Savannah has been staying with her sister and brother-in-law since she arrived. They just moved together from the sister’s house to some mansion more out of the way.
I don’t think the brother-in-law could be making the kind of movements required to take care of the mother since Savannah arrived or since the cops got involved. He would have required outside help from the start and since her arrival which I think would made mistakes and been found out by now.
With that going on I am also not sure he could make any secret communications unless he is some tech guru who just wanted to be a teacher, but I also not sure the communications are from the actual perps.
I hope she is alive, but she just seemed frail physically. The perps would have have planned for her conditions and keeping her healthy for over a week at this point.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 7:48 pm to HouseMom
quote:
I personally think there are too many coincidences between this family and the Epstein case and the Clintons for this to be random.
Political operatives, CIA, MI6, Mossad… all could have had something to do with this. If they thought Savannah was at risk of divulging embarrassing details, then doing something like this is not out of the question for any of them. People get desperate when they fear exposure. I don’t think it’s too crazy to think this could be linked to Epstein, Clinton, or Prince Andrew. Everybody knows the Clintons are not above murder for political gain.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 7:51 pm to Jake88
quote:
Pointing out your sensationalism and boredom that requires an Epstein conspiracy.
What are the odds this 84-year old memaw disappears 24-hours after the Epstein files drop, and who's daughter and son-in-law have a direct connection to the Epstein case by way of working damage control-PR for Bill and Hillary Clinton, interviewing the now deceased seminal Epstein victim, and was famously tasked with pressing Donald Trump to deny the existence of a pedo cult?
Vince Gilligan couldn't write a better script.
Posted on 2/9/26 at 7:55 pm to Stat M Repairman
quote:Don't know. What are the odds that some of these sophisticated super powerful people decided on a plan that is sussed out by a people on the internet in a day or 3?
What are the odds this 84-year old memaw disappears 24-hours after the Epstein files drop, and who's daughter and son-in-law have a direct connection to the Epstein case by way of working damage control-PR for Bill and Hillary Clinton, interviewing the now deceased seminal Epstein victim, and was famously tasked with pressing Donald Trump to deny the existence of a pedo cult?
So once "they" quiet Guthrie nobody else will report on it or have their mee-maw kidnapped too?
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 7:57 pm
Posted on 2/9/26 at 7:58 pm to Jake88
Don't know but these are the same people that brought us 'covid came from bat-soup' and 'a pipe broke so we had to stop counting votes in 2020'
Posted on 2/9/26 at 8:04 pm to Stat M Repairman
Although deadline has passed we still haven't had a firm answer who dropped her off that night. Why? They've tried to redirect the original statement it was Tomasso. Why?
Why has the Tomasso talk become non existent?
We were told right off the bat it was a a crime scene but still nothing about what was discovered in the home. Why?
The ransom thing has been a deliberate ploy to mislead.
She's dead.
Someone was in that house taking care of business for 4 hours. Sedating her perhaps and doing whatever unimaginable thing to the body. When it was time to go they went out, destroyed the doorbell camera, and left with an accidental bit of blood behind.
Objective was for Annie and Tomasso to get inheritance soon.
Why has the Tomasso talk become non existent?
We were told right off the bat it was a a crime scene but still nothing about what was discovered in the home. Why?
The ransom thing has been a deliberate ploy to mislead.
She's dead.
Someone was in that house taking care of business for 4 hours. Sedating her perhaps and doing whatever unimaginable thing to the body. When it was time to go they went out, destroyed the doorbell camera, and left with an accidental bit of blood behind.
Objective was for Annie and Tomasso to get inheritance soon.
This post was edited on 2/10/26 at 9:40 am
Posted on 2/9/26 at 10:48 pm to Bayou
quote:
Although deadline has passed we still haven't had a firm answer who dropped her off that night. Why? They've tried to redirect the original statement it was Tomasso. Why?
Yes, In the early days of the investigation all authorities involved reported that Tomasso drove Nancy home and according to Tomasso he made sure that she was safely inside before departing for his home.
Days later when the FBI took over the investigation the reported story changed to "a family member drove her home".
For some reason the FBI would not publicly acknowledge that it was Tomasso.
The latest development in the case is that Savannah and her siblings are no longer communicating with the would be kidnappers.
I guess they finally figured out the emails had nothing to do with her disappearance.
.
Posted on 2/10/26 at 7:07 am to Disco Ball
Another change to the details of the story although minor...
She wasn't supposed to go to church as has been reported, she was going to a friends house to watch a livestream of a church service.
Yes minor, but similar to the who dropped her off vagueness, it seems like the local Sheriff fricked up and convoluted everything from the start.
She wasn't supposed to go to church as has been reported, she was going to a friends house to watch a livestream of a church service.
Yes minor, but similar to the who dropped her off vagueness, it seems like the local Sheriff fricked up and convoluted everything from the start.
Posted on 2/10/26 at 9:09 am to Disco Ball
quote:
Without proof of death aka "a body" probating her estate would be a lengthy process
I'd be shocked if someone like that didn't have a will and trust set up to avoid any sort of probate.
Posted on 2/10/26 at 9:42 am to Chucktown_Badger
Chance this is some sort of witchcraft thing?
Posted on 2/10/26 at 9:54 am to Bayou
About 32.33 repeating of course percentage.
Posted on 2/10/26 at 10:04 am to spaghettioeauxs
They apparently swabbed a few recent workers on the house…. Lends to there being some physical evidence in the house.
Posted on 2/10/26 at 10:05 am to Disco Ball
quote:
They would never bury her body.
They gain nothing unless she is declared dead and her estate can be probated.
Without proof of death aka "a body" probating her estate would be a lengthy process
If it's the son in law and daughter, I doubt they have considered the probate process without a body. They don't seem like they would have thought that far ahead
Posted on 2/10/26 at 10:30 am to HouseMom
Anyone know if the house had an alarm? If so, was it on during the hours she went to eat?
Posted on 2/10/26 at 11:32 am to Lsut81
Fox News is reporting that the Feds have a surveillance image of the suspected bad guy that they will be releasing to the public soon.
Posted on 2/10/26 at 11:33 am to TDsngumbo
what are the facts of this case...ie, the timing when she got dropped off, when phone stopped pinging pacemaker, etc...
Posted on 2/10/26 at 11:36 am to Chicken
quote:
what are the facts of this case...ie, the timing when she got dropped off, when phone stopped pinging pacemaker, etc...
Gemini roundup for you:
The Disappearance
Nancy, 84, was last seen on the night of Saturday, January 31. Her son-in-law, Tommaso Cioni, dropped her off at her Tucson home around 9:48 p.m. after a family dinner. The alarm was raised the next morning when she didn't show up for a church service.
Leads and Evidence
While authorities haven't named a formal suspect or person of interest, they've confirmed several disturbing details that shifted this from a "missing person" case to a criminal investigation:
The Scene: Investigators found blood spatters on her front porch, which DNA testing confirmed belonged to Nancy.
The Tech: Her doorbell camera was manually disconnected around 1:47 a.m. that Sunday, and the camera itself was later found to be missing. Even more concerning, her pacemaker disconnected from its monitoring app at 2:28 a.m.
The "Inside Job" Theory: Because the kidnappers seemingly knew where the cameras were and how to disable them, some theories suggest the perpetrator had intimate knowledge of the home layout.
The Ransom Note
Several media outlets (including TMZ and KOLD-TV) received messages demanding $6 million in Bitcoin.
Credibility: The FBI is taking them seriously because they mentioned specific details not known to the public, like a particular floodlight and an Apple Watch at the scene.
The Deadline: There was a major deadline set for Monday, February 9, at 5 p.m.. That deadline has now passed. Savannah Guthrie and her siblings even posted a video over the weekend saying, "We received your message... we will pay," but there’s been no public confirmation of a "proof of life" or a successful exchange.
Current Status
The FBI has joined the Pima County Sheriff’s Department and is offering a $50,000 reward. They’ve also warned about "imposter" ransom notes; in fact, one man has already been arrested for sending a fraudulent demand to the family.
The biggest worry right now is her health. She relies on specific daily medication and a pacemaker, and with ten days having passed, the urgency is at an all-time high.
Posted on 2/10/26 at 11:37 am to Chicken
quote:
what are the facts of this case...ie, the timing when she got dropped off, when phone stopped pinging pacemaker, etc...
Short and sweet
Saturday, Jan. 31
5:32 p.m. — Nancy Guthrie takes an Uber to her family's home for dinner
9:48 p.m. — Guthrie is dropped off at her Tucson, Arizona, home by a family member. The garage door opens
9:50 p.m. — The garage door closes
Sunday, Feb. 1
1:47 a.m. — The doorbell camera is disconnected.
2:12 a.m. — Camera software detects movement, but there is no video available
2:28 a.m. — Guthrie's pacemaker app disconnects from her phone.
11:56 a.m. — Guthrie's family checks on her after she did not show up at friend's house.
12:03 p.m. — Guthrie's family calls 911 to report a missing person.
This post was edited on 2/10/26 at 11:56 am
Popular
Back to top


2





