Started By
Message

re: Potentially Unpopular Opinion Regarding Coronavirus

Posted on 3/31/20 at 11:27 pm to
Posted by CP3
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
7592 posts
Posted on 3/31/20 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

I am sorry, I thought we are talking about people that have to be treated for coronavirus. You think the Urgent Care locations are dealing with the late term issues?


I was simply offering an alternate view that tanking the economy may not be worth “spreading out” the infection rate
This post was edited on 3/31/20 at 11:28 pm
Posted by Chuckiee
Member since Jan 2007
2617 posts
Posted on 3/31/20 at 11:29 pm to
quote:

I was simply offering an alternate view that tanking the economy may not be worth “spreading out” the infection rate


And this is what my statement was in line with.
Posted by tigerfan88
Member since Jan 2008
9291 posts
Posted on 3/31/20 at 11:30 pm to
The current numbers, given the viral incubation period, symptom progression, and testing delays are completely irrelevant to any determination of the effectiveness of a quarantine.

Probably 90% of positive tests caught this thing before shelter in place rules.

You need a month of shelter in place before you judge it’s effectiveness.

Cases in Lombardy Italy, the first area reporting real data to do a shelter in place, began seeing a consistent drop in cases about a month after shelter in place.
Posted by t00f
Not where you think I am
Member since Jul 2016
102382 posts
Posted on 3/31/20 at 11:31 pm to
As a business owner I am very upset right now.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
23984 posts
Posted on 3/31/20 at 11:37 pm to
quote:

quote:

quote:

When did the ER’s stop accepting patients due to lack of insurance ?



Where did he say ER? There are a lot of other places to receive healthcare than the emergency room.



I am sorry, I thought we are talking about people that have to be treated for coronavirus. You think the Urgent Care locations are dealing with the late term issues?
I think this is what people aren't computing... Urgent Care clinics aren't going to be any help.

98, 99% of Covid infected people get "the cold", and plow through it fine at home.

That 1-2% that need medical treatment, we aren't arresting things with "just normal" hospitalization. If this shite gets the better of someone to the point that they need help, they are almost always headed towards a vent. We can't get their O2 sats up with just nasal cannulas.

This is what separates it from the flu and other things I've seen. It's scary how fast people decline, once they start.
Posted by Twenty 49
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2014
21536 posts
Posted on 3/31/20 at 11:39 pm to
quote:

to let the virus run its course


Should we do the same if ebola hits? Ebola party for the kids and such.

Posted by Hamma1122
Member since Sep 2016
22573 posts
Posted on 3/31/20 at 11:44 pm to
Not unpopular
Posted by TexasTiger89
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2005
27002 posts
Posted on 3/31/20 at 11:48 pm to
quote:

Heat and humidity does not kill it or slow it. It’s spreading like wildfire in S. Florida and we’ve had temps in the high 80’s to low 90’s for weeks.


90's and high humidity is the weather here every day all year long. Kuala Lumpur locked down March 17th and nothing is open except hospitals, clinics, a few restaurants for take out, pharmacies and grocery stores. The virus has not slowed a bit with number of cases each day.
Posted by CP3
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2009
7592 posts
Posted on 3/31/20 at 11:48 pm to
Considering the mortality rate for Ebola is like 25% at a minimum, thats a much different scenario.
This post was edited on 3/31/20 at 11:49 pm
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53613 posts
Posted on 3/31/20 at 11:54 pm to
quote:

Discuss, if you'd like.



Everyone who agrees should also sign a waiver for willingly passing on access to an ICU bed for coronavirus infection.

Then I would have no problem with this plan.
This post was edited on 3/31/20 at 11:54 pm
Posted by Twenty 49
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2014
21536 posts
Posted on 4/1/20 at 12:16 am to
Pres. Trump today said riding it out is a bad idea.

quote:

“What would have happened if we did nothing? Because there was a group that said, ‘Let’s just ride it out,’” he said, noting that even some people with “common sense” had offered such a recommendation. If that had been the case, he said, 2.2 million people would have died in a short span.

“Now, I don't think that would have been possible because you would have had people dying all over the place,” Trump said. “This would not have been a normal life. How many people have even seen anybody die? You would have seen people dying on airplanes. You would have been seeing people dying in hotel lobbies. You would have seen death all over.”


LINK

But on February 26 he did say: "This is a flu. This is like a flu"; "Now, you treat this like a flu"; "It's a little like the regular flu that we have flu shots for. And we'll essentially have a flu shot for this in a fairly quick manner."

March 9 he said: "So last year 37,000 Americans died from the common Flu. It averages between 27,000 and 70,000 per year. Nothing is shut down, life & the economy go on. At this moment there are 546 confirmed cases of CoronaVirus, with 22 deaths. Think about that!"

So it is confusing, even for Trump. Treat it like the flu? Not the flu; millions will die without strong shutdown measures? Something else tomorrow?

His position is evolving.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41923 posts
Posted on 4/1/20 at 12:24 am to
quote:

This is the approach Sweden is taking, will be interesting to see how it works out and compare in hindsight.


Their number of deaths dwarfs their neighbors and banned large gatherings yesterday.
Posted by sawtooth
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2017
3588 posts
Posted on 4/1/20 at 12:50 am to
Sweeden has 180 deaths. That is in a country of 10.4 million. Does not seem too scary to me.
This post was edited on 4/1/20 at 1:32 am
Posted by AmosMosesAndTwins
Lake Charles
Member since Apr 2010
19015 posts
Posted on 4/1/20 at 12:54 am to
quote:

The best course of action would be to let the virus run its course while taking whatever measures can be reasonably taken to(a) isolate those most at-risk from the virus infecting them and (b) to take measures, if they do get infected, to ensure that they are treated swiftly and with appropriate measures.

In the absence of actual evidence that this virus will get killed by heat and humidity, or an actual reasonably foreseeable treatment option is imminent, the current approach is not actually saving lives. It is simply extending some for a few months. In the absence of data indicating an actual reduction in the number of individuals infected with this virus -- which given the draconian restrictions and median 5-day incubation period we would have seen in most states -- the quarantining measures that are being taken are for naught.

Discuss, if you'd like.


Take a shot every time he says measures.
Posted by DiamondDog
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2019
13439 posts
Posted on 4/1/20 at 12:57 am to
quote:

I'm equal parts encouraged that this will bring a healthcare shift by cutting red tape and shifting the model of medicine back to how it was in earlier days and horrified that we could just about imagine seeing civil unrest in the near horizon.


Hopeful Doc is equal parts hopeful and terrified.
Posted by DustyDinkleman
Here
Member since Feb 2012
20390 posts
Posted on 4/1/20 at 3:58 am to
quote:

Heat and humidity does not kill it or slow it. It’s spreading like wildfire in S. Florida and we’ve had temps in the high 80’s to low 90’s for weeks.


Anyone who seriously thought heat and humidity would kill it AFTER the experts said it wouldn’t is a moron anyway.
Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 4/1/20 at 4:12 am to
quote:

So you’re suggesting Trump should set up “camps” of some sort?



No
Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 4/1/20 at 4:14 am to
quote:

That’s not an unpopular opinion here


I honestly didn't know. The disappearing tennis 2020 tennis season has substantially curtailed my login regularity.
Posted by MidnightVibe
Member since Feb 2015
7896 posts
Posted on 4/1/20 at 4:18 am to
quote:

I think the thought by the pros is that the same amount will get the virus but if you spread it out over time it won’t overwhelm them hospitals and they can treat people more easily and have the supplies needed.


Yeah, I get this argument. I've heard it roughly 589 times on facebook over the past 10 or say days.

I just don't find it particularly persuasive for at least two reasons:
1) I have seen no evidence of a nationally overstressed health care system. At most, this has been true in NY/NJ, and even there I think there's reason to suspect it's been overstated.
2) I've seen no evidence -- indeed, not even a single advanced argument -- that the people who died of this would have lived but for the depletion of health-care resources.
Posted by saint tiger225
San Diego
Member since Jan 2011
49211 posts
Posted on 4/1/20 at 4:18 am to
No, we must watch the news and believe that this virus will kill 90% of the world's population. Doom and gloom is the only way!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram