Favorite team:New Orleans Pelicans 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:9210
Registered on:1/6/2008
Online Status:
 Online

Recent Posts

Message
You could say almost the exact same thing about Richards. Richards lets the cross go through his legs for the first goal, he’s beaten for pace on the long ball for third goal that made Freese come out, and it’s his giveaway on the fourth goal.

Freeman had a terrible clearance on the first goal, let Trossard get the cross in on the second goal and played a part in the giveaway for the fourth goal.


Just don’t see the point of focusing on Ream when every other defender made just as if not more egregious errors in the build up to the goals.
As we have gotten more technically proficient with our player pool over the last ten years we’ve lost a lot of the physicality and size of those 2002-2014 US team.

The elite European teams have the technical ability but combine it with a lot of more size.
Everyone sucked yesterday. Yes if Ream was William Saliba maybe were saved, but I don’t think it’s fair to point the finger at him. Every single goal started with schoolboy errors and mistakes from someone not named Tim Ream.

First goal starts with a terrible headed clearance by Freeman, no one near him and he just pops it straight up into the heart of the box. Primary culprits are Dest and Mckennie for just standing there and letting the Belgian player pick up the loose ball and ghost into the box. Then the cross goes through Richards’ legs and Ream doesn’t react quick enough, but it all happened incredibly quickly due to Dest inexplicably not clearing a loose ball.

Second goal Dest and Freeman have Trossard 2 v 1 and not only let him get in the cross but let him get to the byline and cross it back towards goal, letting the attacker come forward with all the momentum while Ream is now facing his own goal and has lost leverage on the attacker. Equal culpability between Ream and Dest/Freeman.

Third goal is obviously on Freese. Yes Ream could have saved the day and he did get a touch but Freese just can’t make that mistake. Richards also beaten for pace with the ball over the top which forced Freese to come out.

Fourth goal (not that it mattered) almost entirely on Richards for a terrible giveaway in the box. Again Ream could have erased the mistake if he’s William Saliba.

re: Does Poch stay or go?

Posted by tigerfan88 on 7/6/26 at 11:33 pm to
We also looked significantly better in every game leading up to this one.

Our performances against Paraguay/australia/Bosnia were some of the best we’ve ever had in a WC.

And ultimately this was the same result we had in the round of 16, but we didn’t actually play any better against Netherlands or Belgium our last two times out. We just bunkered and technically lost by less.

We had a shitty performance and we were still an all time Matt Freese frick up away from a competitive game against Belgium
We got up early in all our other games which helped us be much more patient in our build up. We played from behind so much of this game we kept forcing the issue and weren’t nearly as patient trying to recycle and probe the defense.
I don’t think the Balogun thing helped. And I think being essentially favorites against a legit European side got in their heads.

It’s way easier to play as an underdog in those scenarios. Expect to not have a lot of the ball, play on the counter. We set up to dominate that game and I think our guys lost their nerve a bit and didn’t trust themselves
It was one of the most obvious tight butthole performances I’ve ever seen in sports. Idk if it was the quarterfinals at home. Idk if it was the Balogun thing.

Belgium is definitely better than anyone we’ve played so far…but the moment was obviously just way too big for whatever reason
Our touch and skill isn’t nearly as bad as it looked tonight. Just a collective shitting of the bed from the whole team.

Moment so clearly got to them
For sure. Everyone gets blame for how the first half went. Every single player was timid and just looked so overwhelmed.

That being said it’s 2-1 and we’re looking good and growing into the game with the Reyna sub…and then we go no call on Pulisic, he’s injured and down to ten men, Freese fricks up

re: US Soccer is going backwards

Posted by tigerfan88 on 7/6/26 at 9:58 pm to
Yeah we started to get a foothold in midfield later in the game after the Reyna sub, but the Freese fart just ended things.

It was really a bad performance all around
I agree. I don’t think he was to blame for either goal, he just couldn’t erase the mistakes of others.

As bad as everyone was, I think there’s a good chance the game ends 2–2 if Freese doesn’t make that huge mistake. The Reyna sub worked and were starting to turn the screws
I mean it’s hard to say what our game plan was. Guys couldn’t even play simple passes or trap the ball. No one won a tackle against a Belgian player in midfield all fricking game.

It was just one of the most obvious examples of shitting the bed I can remember
Yeah I mean we had egregious individual defensive errors by Dest twice, Freese, and Richards.

And Ream isn’t the guy to erase those mistakes, which he had the chance to do twice.
I think it obviously did. I don’t think we were in a right head space mentally.

I mean guys couldn’t play simple passes or trap the ball or make a single tackle.

We just weren’t there

re: US Soccer is going backwards

Posted by tigerfan88 on 7/6/26 at 9:03 pm to
I tbink the Balogun controversy ended up hurting us a lot. Team looked rattled and that can’t have helped
They threw up on themselves. Just four simple defensive mistakes
I don’t think there’s a single US fan who would be complaining about Erling Haaland or Mbappe getting a bullshite red card overturned if we were playing them next.

Let’s fricking settle it 11 v 11 in a fair game. Bunch of babies.

re: FIFA dismisses Belgium appeal

Posted by tigerfan88 on 7/6/26 at 1:49 pm to
I think targeting is a very interesting comp to make because it highlights a cultural difference of approach to the same issue.

American fans don’t like these sort of suspensions as a rule and think they’re unfair. Ever since the NCAA introduced suspensions for targeting the fan bases and teams have been pushing back and raising complaints and slowly but surely the rule has gotten less severe and now they aren’t even suspending for a first time offense.

Meanwhile the Europeans just accept red cards and suspension rules as an immutable law of the universe that can’t be changed or challenged but rather just suffered.

re: FIFA dismisses Belgium appeal

Posted by tigerfan88 on 7/6/26 at 1:41 pm to
You can appeal a targeting suspension after the game and try to get it overturned. Also the targeting suspension isn’t nearly as punitive, as you only miss the first half of the next game.

Honestly it wouldn’t be a bad idea for soccer to try to copy, I.e go with a suspension rule more similar to targeting than what they normally have. Red card in the first half you just miss that game, red card in second half you miss the first half of the next game.

re: FIFA dismisses Belgium appeal

Posted by tigerfan88 on 7/6/26 at 12:54 pm to
They basically have Stockholm syndrome with some of the red card and PK rules that soccer has.
FIFA also suspended one game red card punishments for Otamendi and Caicedo, the same as they did for Balogun. So there is also recent precedent for negating a one game suspension.

Again this is something FIFA did for four different players entering the World Cup who were going to have sit out WC games due to red cards. The U.S. is benefiting from the shift in policy but we didn’t start it. Four other countries, including a UEFA one, all got the benefit of FIFA invoking Article 27 before we did.