Started By
Message
locked post

Politicians push for regulation of ‘ghost guns’

Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:33 pm
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
61063 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:33 pm
quote:

With U.S. gun sales soaring during the coronavirus pandemic, a group of 15 Senate Democrats is introducing legislation calling for new restrictions on untraceable “ghost guns.”

Made using gun kits or by 3D printing — and sometimes referred to as “80 percent guns” because they haven’t reached a level of manufacturing that meets the legal definition of a firearm — these weapons have no serial numbers, as compared to guns sold by federally licensed gun dealers. There’s also no requirement to obtain a federal background check for anyone who buys a kit and builds such a weapon, and they can be sold by unlicensed dealers.

Led by Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, these Senate Democrats — who include Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York — want to require that all guns sold in the United States after Jan. 1, 2022, can be traced by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.



How does the OT feel about this?

Read more
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
88351 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:36 pm to
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38578 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:38 pm to
Posted by dbeck
Member since Nov 2014
29454 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

push for regulation of ‘ghost guns’

It's to late for that. Soon we will have widespread, cheap access to 3d metal printing.

Then people can make their own .50 cal Browning at home.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42789 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:40 pm to
frick them
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:42 pm to
Doesn't matter what I think. If Democrats are for it, reason stands against it.
Posted by dragginass
Member since Jan 2013
3348 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:43 pm to
Edit:. I didn't read the 80% lower part. My bad.
This post was edited on 5/14/20 at 10:27 pm
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
59352 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:43 pm to
Legally, I get why something needs to be put into writing on people 3D printing untraceable guns at home. It’s not going to stop it though
Posted by Jester
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
34717 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:44 pm to
quote:

It's to late for that. Soon we will have widespread, cheap access to 3d metal printing.

Then people can make their own .50 cal Browning at home


Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
139231 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:45 pm to
Posted by 007mag
Death Valley, Sec. 408
Member since Dec 2011
3928 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:47 pm to
quote:

It's not true, first of all. When you buy a lower receiver it is treated like a firearm purchase and must be sold through a FFL
Not an 80% complete receiver and with a jig, a router and an afternoon it can be made 100%. I hope it doesn't pass but there will be a shortage of 80% receivers and machining jigs now.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
23422 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:47 pm to
Until they do something about nightmare knives, boogie bombs or frankencannons this will all just be useless partisan BS
Posted by FinkyStinger
Georgia
Member since Jan 2009
2226 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:49 pm to
Wrong
Posted by Junky
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2005
9325 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:51 pm to
quote:

sometimes referred to as “80 percent guns” because they haven’t reached a level of manufacturing that meets the legal definition of a firearm


You can buy 80% lowers with no checks because, technically, they aren't firearms. Somewhere, we have to say "OK, that isn't a firearm. Now this over here is a firearm."

Regulating 80% lowers only leads to needing a background check on triggers, grips, and barrels....where does it stop? Are we really going to perform background checks on scope rails?

This is just utter nonsense as is the term "Ghost Gun". They just want control.
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
52912 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:53 pm to
Posted by X123F45
Dictated not Read
Member since Apr 2015
30048 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

A 3D printed unregistered firearm is already illegal.


No it isn't.

And your verbage tells me you're clueless.
This post was edited on 5/14/20 at 5:56 pm
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
53839 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 5:59 pm to
It's a feel good policy that won't have any impact on crime. Kind of like closing the "gun show loophole"
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122548 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

Doesn't matter what I think. If Democrats are for it, reason stands against it.


Jesus Christ. Your mindset is the perfect example of what is wrong with our political system.

The people win when all sides do not otherwise we would live in a dictatorship.
Posted by wheelr
New Iberia
Member since Jul 2012
6239 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

You can buy 80% lowers with no checks because, technically, they aren't firearms. Somewhere, we have to say "OK, that isn't a firearm. Now this over here is a firearm."



Exactly. The article keeps calling it a weapon. It is a chunk of metal with a few machined features.

Like you said, it is debating at what point to call something a firearm.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46757 posts
Posted on 5/14/20 at 6:08 pm to
quote:

unregistered firearm is already illegal.


That's odd. I never had to register any of my firearms.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram